Note: The following article is from the May 2000 issue of The SPECTRUM Newspaper. Public use of this article is permitted as long as origin of the article and contacting information for The SPECTRUM accompanies the article. Contacting information for The SPECTRUM is as follows: Website: http://www.thespectrumnews.org/
E‑mail address: thespectrum@tminet.com
Telephone: 1(877) 280‑2866 toll‑free (US & Canada) 1(661) 823‑9696 (All others) Regular mail: 9101 West Sahara Ave., PMB158, Las Vegas, NV 89117
The Most Powerful Man In The World?
The "Black" Pope
Count Hans Kolvenbach—The Jesuit’s General
[My comments, this man is a jew, and so have all the Jesuit Generals from the very beginning. Although it will be dened by most Catholics and many other people, Christians and non-Christians. But never the less a study of history will so that to be the truth. The Catholic Church unknown to most of its adherents has been under the absolute control of the jews for hundreds of years. And it matters not whether people get angry with me for this statement the facts are there if they are willing to search it out; but I will not do it for them because it would be akin to casting pearls before swine, they will even after being presented with all of the information, simply deny it, so it is not worth all that work for nothing]
4/15/00 RICK MARTIN
So, you thought you were pretty well informed by now about all of the main players on the "conspiracy" playing field? You’ve maybe been hearing for years about (or bumped into on your own) the various elements of society who control our world from behind the scenes.
You’ve gotten familiar with the role played by, for instance, the Khazarian Zionists (who invented the word "Jew" to disguise their adopted heritage, as distinguished from the biblical Judeans), or the role played by the Banksters (banking gangsters) controlling the economies of the world, by the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderbergers, the Committee of 300 (the 17 wealthiest so‑called "elite" families)—the Rothschild's in England and Rockefellers in America and Bronfman's in Canada, and on and on, comprising the physical power structure of the New World Order puppets under the direction of darkly motivated, other‑dimensional "master deceivers" commonly known as Lucifer or Satan and their "fallen angel" cohorts.
While all of those details contribute to understanding the Larger Picture, what you are about to read fills in a most important Missing Link in this entire structure. And I don’t mean a little side issue; I mean a link so central—yet so well hidden from general public view, and for so long—that even the most studied of "conspiracy theory" scholars probably have not put together much of the information that is going to be presented here.
To call the following outlay "controversial" and "sensitive" is about as mild an understatement of the truth of the matter as can be made! This missing link changes the entire slant of the entire playing field!
After months of anticipation and weeks of preparation, I was finally able to speak with Vatican Assassins author Eric Jon Phelps on Tuesday, March 14. There was simply no other way to cover Eric’s historic masterpiece spanning, literally, five centuries, than to just ask questions covering huge spans of time and major historical events. It took us almost four hours to accomplish the task, yet we could easily have gone on for another forty.
We here at The SPECTRUM are simply unwilling to reduce the importance of this work by presenting it in a too distilled fashion. In fact, in order to share this material with at least some of the pertinent backup, Eric has granted us permission to print (directly after the interview) several excerpts from his soon‑to‑be‑published book which will help you in understanding certain aspects of this magnificently important and broad‑sweeping story. The missing link is surely a central link.
Let’s call this story the "Jesuit‑Vatican connection" to the unfolding New World Order agenda. You make up your own mind just how absolutely central, yet well hidden, has been this link! There’s a good reason the secret Vatican library is so extensive and yet remains so intact from outside intrusion, despite the many others who would like to possess such a collection of information detailing much "censored" data about our true, otherworldly cultural heritage.
When one reads a work like Vatican Assassins, one can’t help but reflect back on the purposely "adjusted" and watered down and boring moments in high school history class. Meanwhile, the true history of what has gone on is dynamic and full of calculated intrigue.
In this business, I’ve heard and read a lot of things. But when I had to pick my jaw up off the floor during the reading of certain historical portions in Eric’s book—well, let me just say that Truth certainly is stranger, and far more interesting, than the many fictions we’ve been led to believe are historical fact. And yet The Truth does fit together like the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle.
This book SHOULD be a best‑seller, but it is hardly likely to achieve such general attention—considering how well controlled and censored is the publishing business. Thus is the reason for our lengthy presentation of this most astonishing and critically important material here in The SPECTRUM.
We are in a time of Truth being revealed from all directions. And there is probably no more fundamental, mind‑rattling, and previous notions‑shattering example of that than what is being presented here. The interview is directly followed by a number of pertinent excerpts from Eric’s eye‑opening book—which will be available July 1.
Editor’s note: It should be noted up‑front that the information presented below is the studied opinion of Eric Jon Phelps. We here at The SPECTRUM find much about his presentation of his historical research which meshes with and expands upon Truth which has been presented by many other authors in these pages and elsewhere. And that is good; Truth is Truth is Truth, and should all mesh.
However, for the peace of mind of our unique readership—which typically has cultivated a more aware spiritual perspective than the general public—we do not want to give the impression that we agree with (or wish to promote) some collateral aspects of Eric’s presentation having to do with his personal "religious" convictions. The focus of those convictions follows a much more biblically conventional (literal) path—in stark contrast to the unconventional, questioning, wide‑angle vision of his historical material.
Generally such opinions are simply allowed to stand on their own—for you to sort and interpret as you see fit—rather than being singled‑out to be addressed editorially. However, in this case, the practical side of Eric’s stated religious convictions include the condoning of some degree of violence (or violent protest) and use of armaments. And such convictions are very much the opposite of our philosophical position—for many reasons, not the least of which is the obvious Adversarial bait‑and‑entrapment which would result from choosing what we would consider to be low‑frequency responses to schoolroom Earth’s current challenges.
Yet, if the perceptive reader penetrates "between the lines" thoughtfully, there is glimpsed a recurring commendable spiritual message in Eric’s commentary—of "Have the courage to speak The Truth" and "God helps those who help themselves"—which we certainly DO agree with wholeheartedly and have long supported enthusiastically.
We are in the time of the Great Awakening on this planet. The Light of Truth, intensifying with each passing moment, is nudging many to step forward and share what they know. Will such ones follow that nudge or continue to hide in fear? The answer to that question is perhaps the most important aspect of schoolroom Earth’s relentless testing at this critical time.
One last‑minute footnote before beginning this interview: The Arts & Entertainment (A&E) cable television channel just started to air—on Easter Sunday evening!—a new two‑hour documentary called: The Vatican Revealed. Tape it so you can study it carefully; within the lines of dialog and some of those people chosen for commentaries are many, many clues to the true power of the Vatican over world affairs. It would, of course, be much more revealing to watch the A&E program AFTER having read and digested the following.]
Martin: Before we begin, let me say a few words. The topic of your book is so comprehensive and covers, literally, all aspects of global control by the Jesuits, dating back to 1540. I would like to begin our conversation with a very important point of clarification so that our readers have something to hold onto while reading the historical narrative we are about to present. Let me also add that your book is one of the most compelling, dynamic, genuinely educational historical documents I have ever read. I want to tell you, I am impressed!
You, literally, link every major global conflict and political assassination to the hands of the Jesuit Order. The Jews, as with many other groups you mention, have been the unwitting pawns in this Jesuit Agenda.
[Note that the jews have always been willing accomplishes to instigation of almost all of the wars that have occurred in the last 1000 years or so. Here they are trying to make people believe that the jews would not do such things, but that is not true as a study of history will show - Get that information on the Black Pope from: Chick Publications, P.O. Box 3500, Ontario, CA 91761‑1199 - Willie Martin]
Today, the present. I’m going to start here, and then we’re going to go way back in time and work our way up. But, I want to start HERE because it will give a foundation for going back in time.
Today, who is the Superior General of the Jesuits, the so‑called "Black Pope" (black here refers to hidden, evil activities, not to race or color) who gives the orders to the actual Pope. Is it still Jean‑Baptist Janssens?
Phelps: Janssens, Frenchman. No, he passed away in 1964. Then Pedro Arrupe came to power. Then, after Arrupe died, in 1988, I believe, the present Jesuit General is Count Hans Kolvenbach. I call him Count Hans Kolvenhoof.
Martin: Let’s discuss this position of "General" and, in addition, who is this person, Count Hans Kolvenbach? Who does he serve? What are his origins? Where does he hail from?
Phelps: The present General is a Dutchman, his nationality is Dutch.
Martin: Where is he? Physically, where is he?
Phelps: He resides in Rome, at the headquarters of the Jesuits, called the Church of Jesu. So, the Jesuit General resides in Rome at, what I just called, the Jesuit headquarters.
Martin: The Church of Jesu, is that near the Vatican?
Phelps: It’s not far from the Vatican, right. It’s in the same general area. It’s headquarters of the Knights of Malta.
Martin: Is it part of Vatican City, proper?
Phelps: Right, I believe, yes it is.
Martin: Where does Satan fit into this picture, and what is the ultimate goal of the Jesuits, the so‑called Society of Jesus?
Phelps: The Jesuit General, and the other high Jesuit Generals, they are sorcerers. They are Luciferians, and they worship what they would call Lucifer. They do not believe in Satan. They believe in Lucifer [which is just another name for satan, so who does he think he is fooling here - Willie Martin].
Now, according to Alberto Rivera, he was invited—because he was a top Jesuit at the time in the late ’60s—he was invited to a "Black Mass" in Spain where there were quite a few top Jesuit Generals present. And he called it a "Black Mass." Well, when you’re involved in a "Black Mass," you’re involved in the worship of Lucifer, all dressed in their black capes and so on.
Martin: I’m fascinated by Count Hans Kolvenbach because nobody in the world knows who this person is. I’ve never heard the name.
Phelps: Let me just tell you that you can see his picture and his top Jesuits—just a second and I’ll get the book. The name of the book is called Jesuits: A Multi‑Biography, by Jean Lacoutre, and that is available, usually, in the bookstores. It was published in 1995.
Jean Lacoutre is a Frenchman. He was a communist, is a communist. On the last page of the pictures in it, that is right adjacent to page 343, you see Peter Hans Kolvenbach. He’s the Jesuit General, and he looks like just a very evil individual. There’s a Black man, who’s a high Jesuit, he’s a 29 Superior Jesuit with his cosmopolitan General staff. One of the General staff looks like Ben Kingsley of Shindler’s List. There are six White men, and one Black man. And that’s his General staff.
Martin: What is the process of choosing a successor General?
Phelps: The High Jesuits elect him, and he’s elected for life—unless he becomes a "heretic."
Martin: And the so‑called "High Jesuits" represent what group?
Phelps: I would say that they’re the "professed," the high 4th Degree. When a Jesuit is professed, he is under the Jesuit Oath; he is under the "Bloody Oath" that I have in my book.
Martin: Do we have permission to reprint that Oath in our paper?
Phelps: Of course, absolutely.
Martin: One of my questions has to do with the Oath and it’s similarity to the Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion, and I wrote that question before I got back to the Protocols portion of your book.
Phelps: The Jesuits obviously wrote the Protocols because they have carried out every protocol in that little handbook. They have carried everything out. And, Alberto Rivera says—and he was a Jesuit—he was greatly maligned, not helped at all by the Apostate, Protestants, and Baptists in this country; he was helped, somewhat, by Jack Chick. Jack Chick published his story in six volumes, titled Alberto I, II, III, IV, V, & VI.
[Remember your history, we know that the jews are the authors of the Protocols of the Learned Elders; just read the books by Nesta Webster - Willie Martin]
ALBERTO RIVERA SAYS THAT IT WAS JEWS ALIGNED WITH THE POPE WHO PUBLISHED THE PROTOCOLS. Well, I tend to feel that it was just the Jesuits themselves because they, and they alone, were the ones who were able to bring this to pass.
They’re the ones in the government. They’re the ones behind professional sports. The owner of the Pittsburgh Steelers is a Knight of Malta. The owner of the Detroit Lions is a Knight of Malta. All your top owners of these ball clubs, for the most part, are Knights of Malta, getting the people whooped up in this hoopla over games and sports, while they’re busy creating a tyranny. So, that was one of the things in the Protocols—that they would create "amusements."
Another one they used was Walt Disney, 33rd‑degree Freemason—Disneyworld, Disneyland. Another one was Milton Hersey, with Hersey Park. They create all of these amusements and games and pastimes to get the people drunk with pleasure, while they’re busy overthrowing the Protestant form of government.
Martin: Where does Las Vegas factor into all of this?
Phelps: Las Vegas, well, for the most part, is controlled by the Mafia. But all the high Mafia families are Roman Catholic, and they are ALL subordinate to the Pope or to the Cardinal of New York, which is Cardinal O’Connor—because the Commission, the Mafia Commission resides in New York.
[All of the heads of the Mafia are Catholics, but they are jews also - Willie Martin]
Frank Costello was a member of the Mob Commission, and he was intimate, personal friends with Knight of Malta, Hollywood mogul, Joe Kennedy. And that has not changed.
So, the High Knights are good, dear brothers with the High Mafia Dons—the Gambinos, the Lucchese, the Columbos, all of them. And they control Hollywood, not the Jews. It’s only Jews who are front‑men who are involved in Hollywood and working for the Mafia and for the Cardinal, just like in politics it would be Arlen Spector. Arlen Spector was Spelly’s [Cardinal Spellman’s] Jew in the assassination [of President Kennedy], and he would never say a word about it.
[Note here the author tries to make it appear that the jews are controlled by the Catholic, but that is false, the Catholics are controlled by the jew. You think not, remember when the Catholic church was about to go bankrupt because of a banking scandal a few years ago. That all happened because some of the higher Cathlics tried to throw off the Jewish leadership; so the jews showed them that they could bankrupt the church if they did not remain subservent to them - Willie Martin]
Martin: Now, as we go through here, if there’s anything that you don’t want me to print, please let me know because, literally, I’m going to print everything we say in this conversation.
Phelps: That’s fine, that’s fine with me because it needs to be said.
Martin: Let’s get back to Count Hans Kolvenbach. I want to shine the spotlight on this guy for just a little bit here. Let’s talk about him. What does he do? Who is he? Let’s talk about his position as "General." How do they exercise this control over the Pope? Does the Pope know he’s a pawn?
Phelps: Ok, one question at a time. So, which question do you want me to deal with?
Martin: Let’s just shine the light right on the Count.
Phelps: The Jesuit General, ok.
Martin: Let’s start there, and you tell me everything you want to tell me about that position.
Phelps: The Jesuit General is the absolute, complete, and total dictator and autocrat of the Order. When he speaks, his provincials move. The provincials are his major subordinates. There are around 83 provincials right now.
As I understand it, the Jesuit Order has divided the world into 83 regions. Ok? For each region, there is a Jesuit provincial. There are 10 provincials in the United States. There is one for Central America. There is one for Ireland. They’ve divided up the world into these provinces.
So it’s old Babylonian provincial government, centered in Nebuchadnezzar or the Jesuit General himself; so it’s strictly a Roman form of government where all the states or provinces are subordinate to this worldwide sovereign.
[Here the author confuses the Roman government with the Babylonian one - Willie Martin]
The Jesuit General exercises full and complete power over the Order. He meets with his provincials. When they decide to start a war or an agitation, he gets the information from the provincial of that country, how best to go about this, the demeanor of the people, and then he uses legitimate grievances to foam an agitation—like the 1964 Civil Rights Movement. That was ALL a Jesuit agitation, completely, because the end result was more consolidation of power in Washington with the 1964 Civil Rights Act that was written by [the longtime President of the University of Notre Dame, the Reverend] Theodore Hesburgh.
The Jesuit General rules the world through his provincials. And the provincials then, of course, rule the lower Jesuits, and there are many Jesuits who are not "professed," so many of the lower Jesuits have no idea what’s going on at the top. They have no concept of the power of their Order.
It’s just like Freemasonry. The lower have no idea that the High Shriner Freemasons are working for the Jesuit General. They think that they’re just doing works and being good people. But the bottom line is that the high‑level Freemasons are subject, also, to the Jesuit General because the Jesuit General, with Fredrick the Great, wrote the High Degrees, the last 8 Degrees, of the Scottish Rite Freemasonry when Fredrick protected them when they were suppressed by the Pope in 1773.
[Note the Freemason have been under the control of the jews since Adam Weishopt and his fellow jews infiltrated the order - Willie Martin]
So, you have the alignment with the Jesuit Order and the most powerful Freemason they had in the craft, Fredrick the Great, during their suppression. That is an irrefutable conclusion. And then, when you see the Napoleonic Wars, the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars carried out by Freemasonry, everything Napoleon did, and the Jacobins, whatever they did, completely benefited the Jesuit Order.
[Note the French Revolution was planned, fostered and carried out by jews. They might have been Catholics but they were jews first - Willie Martin]
It’s to this end that Alexander Dumas wrote his The Count Of Monte Cristo. The Count is the Jesuit General. Monte=Mount, Cristo=Christ. The Count of the Mount of Christ. Alexander Dumas was talking about the Jesuit General getting vengeance when the Jesuits were suppressed, and many of them were consigned to an island, three hours sailing, West, off the coast of Portugal. And so, when the Jesuits finally regained their power, they punished all of the monarchs of Europe who had suppressed them, drove them from their thrones, including the Knights of Malta from Malta, using Napoleon.
And Alexander Dumas, who fought for the Italian patriots in 1848, to free Rome from the temporal power of the Pope, wrote many books and one of the books was to expose this, and that was The Count Of Monte Cristo.
So, when you read that book, bear in mind that it’s really a satire on the Jesuit Order regaining their power in France. The Count of Monte Cristo has an intelligence apparatus that can’t be beat. Well, that’s the Jesuit Order.
But the Count doesn’t get what he really ought to have, or his last wish, and that’s the love of woman. He gains back all of his political power; he gains back everything he lost; but he doesn’t have the love of a woman. And THAT is the Jesuit Order. They have no women. They have no love of a woman. Because to have a wife, to have a woman, means you have an allegiance to your wife and family, and you cannot obey the General. That’s why they will NEVER be married, and that’s one of the great KEYS to their success.
They can betray a nation and walk away. They can betray all the Irish Catholics getting on the Titanic, and walk away. They can betray us in Vietnam and walk away. They can betray us every time we go to the hospital and get radiated and cut and drugged, and walk away, because it’s "for the greater glory of God"—Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam: the greater glory of the god who sits in Rome.
Martin: What is the ULTIMATE goal of the Jesuits?
Phelps: Their ultimate goal is the rule of the world, with the Pope of their making, from Solomon’s rebuilt Temple in Jerusalem. That’s their ultimate goal.
Martin: And why is Solomon’s Temple rebuilt so important?
Phelps: Because the Jesuits have always wanted that. When Ignatius Loyola first started the Order, one of the first things he did was, he wanted to go to Jerusalem and set up the Jesuit headquarters there. So, he went there, he tried to do it and failed, came back, went to school, started his Latin studies, etc. Maybe it might be a good idea to just review a little bit about Ignatius Loyola.
[Ignatius Loyola was a jewish bosque]
Martin: Yes.
Phelps: Ok, Ignatius Loyola was a Spanish soldier, and he was wounded at a battle between the French and the Spanish, and his leg was shattered. Well, the French General, because Loyola was very brave in conflict, ordered his own doctors to attend Loyola. So they set the leg and sent him back to his home—which, of course, he was royalty to the Counsel of Loyola in Spain, in the area of the Basques.
Loyola, through his series of desiring to regain his leg—it had healed improperly, so he made a rack where he would stretch the leg, with severe, horrible, awful pain—and trying to stretch this leg to get it back to normal shape, he endured awful, terrible pain. He had it rebroken, again, a couple of times and it still did not heal properly, so he had a perpetual limp. He could no longer be the courtier among women, and as a result, he went into this depression, and he then had this vision of the saints, etc., etc., and he wrote his spiritual exercises.
*************
I will stop at the spiritual exercises, just for a minute, but I’ll take up from there. Loyola then wanted to form an army, but when this happened with his spiritual exercises, those spiritual exercises would be basic training for all of his Jesuits. That’s what they will ALL go through. That’s what every Jesuit goes through today.
One of the maxims of the spiritual exercises is that if my superior says "black is white and white is black," then that’s the way it is. That is in his spiritual exercises. That is what is quoted in JFK, when Kevin Costner is telling his people: "Hey, people, we’ve got to start thinking like the CIA. Black is white and white is black." That was a Jesuit giveaway that the Jesuits produced that movie, because they’re quoting Ignatius Loyola in that movie from his spiritual exercises.
So, Loyola had an indomitable will. He had a will of steel, and he set his mind to regain back what the Papacy had lost to the Reformation. And so, he went to the Pope, and the Pope in 1540 then created the Jesuit Order. But this man is a soldier, he’s a lawyer, and he put together a legion of soldiers and warriors to get back what Rome had lost, as well as institute a World Government for the Pope, from Jerusalem. This was in 1540.
[Here let me insert some history of the Jesuits that the author obviously does not want revealed, as he is trying to exonerate the jews.
The Order of the Jesuits was founded in 1541. It was a Spanish sect called the Alombrados was founded about 1520. Ignatius Loyola, a Jewish Spanish Basque, while a student at Salamanca (1527), was tried by an ecclesiastical commission for alleged sympathy with this sect but was acquitted with an admonition. (Occult Theocracy, by Lady Queenborough (Edith Starr Miller, p. 307) We give the following quotations from the Encyclopedia Britannica.
"The Company of the Jesuits was founded by Don Inigo de Loyola (Ignatius Loyola, a Jew), a Spanish nobleman and soldier, on April 5, 1541, at the church of Saint Paul without the Walls, near Rome, under the sanction of the Pope, Paul III. It has six grades. These are novices, scholastics, temporal, coadjutors, professed of the three vows, and professed of the four vows, the latter two grades being the only ones which confer a share in the government and eligibility for the offices of the society. Its head, virtually a commander‑in‑chief, is known as the General. He wields absolute power over the members who are pledged to blind obedience. The General claims his authority from the Pope.’
“The ‘fourth vow’ is one of special allegiance to the Pope promising to go in obedience to him for missionary purposes whensoever and whithersoever he may order, a pledge seriously qualified in practice, however, by the power given to the general of alone sending out or recalling any missionary. ‘The question has long been hotly debated whether, in addition to these six avowed grades, there be not a seventh, answering in some degree to the Tertiaries of the Franciscan and Dominican orders, secretly affiliated to the society, and acting as its unsuspected emissaries in various lay positions. This class is styled in France 'Jesuits of the short robe,' and some evidence in support of its actual existence was alleged during the lawsuits against the company under Louis XV. The Jesuits themselves deny the existence of any such body, and are able to adduce the negative disproof that no provision for it is to be found in their constitutions. On the other hand, there are clauses therein which make the creation of such a class perfectly feasible if thought expedient.
“One is the power given to the general to receive candidates secretly, and to conceal their admission, for which there is a remarkable precedent in the case of Francis Borgia, Duke of Gandia, afterwards himself general of the society; the other is an even more singular clause, providing for the admission of candidates to the company by persons who are not themselves members of it...The general, who should by the statutes of the society reside permanently at Rome, holds in his hands the right of appointment, not only to the office of provincial over each of the great districts into which the houses are mapped, but to the offices of each house in particular, no shadow of electoral right or even suggestion being recognized.
“The superiors and rectors of all houses and colleges in Europe must report weekly to their provincial on all matters concerning the members of the society and all outsiders with whom they may have had dealings of any sort. The provincial, for his part, must report monthly to the general, giving him a summary of all details which have reached himself. But, as a check on him, all superiors of houses in his province are to make separate reports directly to the general once in three months, and further to communicate with him, without delay, every time any matter of importance occurs, irrespective of any information which the provincial may have forwarded.
“Nor is this all; an elaborate system of espionage and deletion forms part of the recognized order of every house, and, in direct contrast to the ancient indictment and confession of faults in open conventual chapter, every inmate of a house is liable to secret accusation to its superior, while the superior himself may be similarly deleted to the provincial or the general.
“Nor is the general himself exempt from control on the part of the society, lest by any possible error he be unfaithful to its interests. A consultative council is impose on him by the general congregation, consisting of six persons, whom he may neither select nor remove, namely, four assistants, each representing a nation, an admonisher or adviser (resembling the adulates of a military commander) to warn him of any faults or mistakes, and his confessor.
“One of these must be in constant attendance on him; and, while he is not at liberty to abdicate his office, nor to accept any dignity or office outside it without the assent of the society, he may yet be suspended or deposed by its authority. There would seem at first to be an effectual external check provided, however, in the fact that, while all the officers of the society, except the council aforesaid, hold of the general, he in turn holds the Pope, and is his liegeman directly, as well as in virtue of the fourth vow, which he has taken in common with the other professed.
“But such is the extraordinary skill with which the relations of the society to the papacy were originally drafted by Loyola, and subsequently worked by his successors, that it has always remained organically independent, and might very conceivably break with Rome without imperiling its own existence.
“The general has usually stood towards the Pope much as a powerful grand feudatory of the Middle Ages did towards a weak titular lord paramount, or perhaps as the captain of a splendid host of 'Free Companions' did towards a potentate with whom he chose to take temporary and precarious service; and the shrewd Roman populace have long shown their recognition of this fact by styling these two great personages severally the 'White Pope' and the 'Black Pope.'
“In truth the society has never, from the very first, obeyed the Pope, whenever its will and his happened to run counter to each other. The merited odium which has overtaken the Inquisition, usually officered by Dominicans, has induced the Jesuits, whose own controversial methods had been different, to disclaim all connection with that tribunal, and to represent their society as free from complicity in its acts. But, in truth, it was Ignatius Loyola himself who procured its erection in Portugal in 1545‑6, and F. Nithard, one of the very few Cardinals of the society, was inquisitor‑general of that kingdom in 1655.
“The first successes of the Indian mission were entirely amongst the lowest class; but when Robert de'Nobili, to win the Brahmins, adopted their insignia and mode of life in 1605, a step sanctioned by Gregory XV, in 1623, the fathers who followed his example pushed the new caste‑ feeling so far as absolutely to refuse the ministrations and sacraments of religion to the pariahs, lest the Brahmin converts should take offense, an attempt which was reported to Rome by Norbert, a Capuchin, and by the bishop of Rosalia, and was vainly censured in the pontifical briefs of Innocent X in 1645, Clement IX in 1669, Clement XII in 1734 and 1739, and Benedict XIV, in 1745. The 'Chinese rites,' assailed with equal unsuccess by 9 popes, were not finally put down until 1744, by a bull of Benedict XIV...
“By these rites the Jesuit missionaries had virtually assimilated Christianity to heathenism, and their practical reply in opposition to a papal decree in 1700 was to obtain an edict from the emperor of China declaring that there was nothing idolatrous or superstitious in the inculpated usages, while in 1710 they flung Cardinal Tournon, legate of Clement XI, into the prison of the Inquisition at Macao, where he perished.
“Finally, they disobeyed the brief of suppression issued by Clement XIV in 1773, which enjoined them to disperse at once, to send back all novices to their houses, and to receive no more members. It is thus clear that the society has always regarded itself as an independent power, ready indeed to cooperate with the papacy so long as their roads and interests are the same, and to avail itself to the uttermost of the many pontifical decrees in its own favor, but drawing the line far short of practical submission when their interest diverge.
“The Jesuit power [which has, since it creation, been under total control of the Jews], appeared much weakened in England by the rise of the Jewish Power with the advent of Cromwell, persisted nevertheless in its efforts to recapture its former status in that land. During the reign of James II, it schemed and intrigued incessantly through its representatives Father St. Germain [Once regent of the Jesuit College of Clermont] and his successor Father Columbiere. (D. Jones, The Secret History of White‑Hall, 1697, p. 41)
“After the enactment of the limitation of the English throne to Protestant succession the Jesuit diplomatists were hard put. To quote the Encyclopedia further: ‘After many difficulties they had succeeded in getting a footing in France, through the help of Duprat, bishop of Clermont, who founded a college for them in 1545 in the town of Billom, besides making over to them his house at Paris, the Hotel de Clermont, which became the nucleus of the afterwards famous college of Louis‑le‑Grand, while a formal legalization was granted to them by the states‑general at Poissy in 1561.’ From the Jesuit College at Ingolstadt is said to have issued the sect known as ‘The Illuminati of Bavaria’ founded by Adam Weishaupt [a Jew] under the guidance of Nicolai, in 1776. Weishaupt, its nominal founder, however, seems to have played a subordinate though conspicuous role in the organization of this sect. (See The Illuminati Of Bavaria ‑‑ Founded 1776) On July 21, 1773, the Pope had abolished the order of Jesuits but Frederick II of Prussia encouraged and protected them with a view no doubt of using their political knowledge and skill against the Bourbons, the Hapsburgs and the Pope.
“The well‑known authority on theocratic organizations, Heckethorn, writes the following concerning the Jesuits: ‘There is considerable analogy between Masonic and Jesuitic degrees; and the Jesuits also tread down the shoe and bare the knee, because Ignatius Loyola thus presented himself at Rome and asked for the confirmation of the order. Not satisfied with confession, preaching, and instruction, whereby they had acquired unexampled influence, they formed in Italy and France, in 1563, several 'Congregations,' i.e. clandestine meetings held in subterranean chapels and other secret places. the Congregationists had a sectarian organization, with appropriate catechisms and manuals, which had to be given up before death, wherefore very few copies remain.’ (Heckethorn, Secret Societies of all Ages and Countries, Vol. II, p. 296)
“To show the further similarity of the Jesuit‑Judaic‑Masonic‑Gnostic‑Brahmin‑Illuminati theology we now quote from a MS. in the library of the Rue Richelieu at Paris entitled Histoire des congregations et sodalites jesuitiques depuis 1563 jusqu'au temps present (1709). (Schaff‑Herzog, The Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge, Art. Jesuits) Initiation.
“From this, as well as other works, we gather some of the ceremonies with which aspirants were initiated into the Order. Having in nearly all Roman Catholic countries succeeded in becoming the educators of the young, they were able to mold the youthful mind according to their secret aims. If then, after a number of years, they detected in the pupil a blind and fanatic faith, conjoined with exalted pietism and indomitable courage, they proceeded to initiate him; in the opposite case, they excluded him.
“The proofs lasted twenty‑four hours, for which the candidate was prepared by long and severe fasting, which, by prostrating his bodily strength, inflamed his fancy, and, just before the trial, a powerful drink was administered to him. Then the mystic scene began ‑‑ diabolical apparitions, evocation of the dead, representations of the flames of hell, skeletons, moving skulls, artificial thunder and lightning, in fact, the whole paraphernalia and apparatus of the ancient mysteries. If the neophyte, who was closely watched, showed fear of terror, he remained for ever in the inferior degree; but if he bore the proof well, he was advanced to a higher grade.
“At the initiation into the second degree (Scholastici) the same proofs, but on a grander scale, had to be undergone. The candidate, again prepared for them by long fastings, was led with his eyes bandaged into a large cavern, resounding with wild howlings and roarings, which he had to traverse, reciting at the same time prayers specially appointed for that occasion. At the end of the cave he had to crawl through a narrow opening, and while doing this, the bandage was taken from his eyes by an unseen hand, and he found himself in a square dungeon, whose floor was covered with mortuary cloth, on which stood three lamps, shedding a feeble light on the skulls and skeletons ranged around.
“This was the Cave of Evocation, the Black Chamber, so famous in the annals of the Fathers. Here, giving himself up to prayer, the neophyte passed some time, during which the priests could, without his being aware of it, watch his every movement and gesture.
“If his behavior was satisfactory, all at once two brethren, representing archangels, presented themselves before him, without his being able to tell whence they had so suddenly started up, a good deal can be done with properly fitted and oiled trap‑doors, and, observing perfect silence, bound his forehead with a white band soaked with blood, and covered with hieroglyphics; they then hung a small crucifix round his neck, and a small satchel containing relics, or what did duty for them.
“Finally, they took off all his clothing, which they cast on a pyre in one corner of the cave, and marked his body with numerous crosses, drawn with blood. At this point, the hierophant with his assistants entered, and, having bound a red cloth round the middle of the candidate's body, the brethren, clothed in bloodstained garments, placed themselves beside him, and drawing their daggers, formed the steel arch over his head.
“A carpet being then spread on the floor, all knelt down and prayed for about an hour, after which the pyre was secretly set on fire; the further wall of the cave opened, the air resounded with strains, now gay, now lugubrious, and a long procession of specters, phantoms, angels, and demons filed past the neophyte like the 'supers' in a pantomime.
“Whilst this farce was going on, the candidate took the following oath: 'In the name of Christ crucified, I swear to burst the bonds that yet unite me to father, mother, brothers, sisters, relations, friends; to the King, magistrates, and any other authority, to which I may ever have sworn fealty, obedience, gratitude, or service.
“I renounce...the place of my birth, henceforth to exist in another sphere. I swear to reveal to my new superior, whom I desire to know, what I have done, thought, read learnt, or discovered, and to observe and watch all that comes under my notice. I swear to yield myself up to my superior, as if I were a corpse, deprived of life and will. I finally swear to flee temptation, and to reveal all I succeed in discovering, well aware that lightning is not more rapid and ready than the dagger to reach me wherever I may be.'
“The new member having taken this oath was then introduced into a neighboring cell, where he took a bath, and was clothed in garments of new and white linen. He, then, finally repaired with the other brethren to a banquet, where he could with choice food and wine compensate himself for his long abstinence, and the horrors and fatigues he had passed through.
“In 1614, there was published at Cracow what purported to be the Secret Instructions given to members of the Society of Jesus. It is said that Hieronymus Zahorowski, who had recently severed his connection with the society, published the book with the cooperation of Count George Zbraski and other polish enemies of the order but the repudiation or the work by the society is no conclusive evidence of its spuriousness as it has been its policy from the beginning to deny all discreditable reports and to take the chance of being proved unveracious. (Schaff‑Herzog, Art. Jesuits)
“It will suffice to give the headings of the chapters forming the Book of Secret Instruction of the Society of Jesus. (Heckethorn, Vol. II, p. 302) The Preface specially warns superiors not to allow it to fall into the hands of strangers, as it might give them a bad opinion of the Order. The Chapters are headed as follows:
"I. How the Society is to proceed in founding a new establishment.
II. How the Brethren of the Society may acquire and preserve the friendship of Princes and other distinguished Personages.
III. How the Society is to conduct itself towards those who possess great influence in a state; and who, though they are not rich, may yet be of service to others.
IV. Hints to Preachers and Confessors of Kings and great personages.
V. What conduct to observe toward the clergy and other religious orders.
VI. How to win over rich widows.
VII. How to hold fast widows and dispose of their property.
VIII. How to induce the children of widows to adopt a life of religious seclusion.
IX. Of the increase of College revenues.
X. Of the private rigor of discipline to be observed by the society.
XI. How 'Ours' shall conduct themselves toward those that have been dismissed from the society.
XII. Whom to keep and make much of in the society.
XIII. How to select young people for admission into the society, and how to keep them there.
XIV. Of reserved cases, and reasons for dismissing from the society.
XV. How to behave towards nuns and devout women.
XVI. How to pretend contempt for riches.
XVII. General means for advancing the interests of the society.
“The intermeddling of this society in the affairs, political, ecclesiastical and civil, of many countries, is related in numerous works, and repeatedly produced the suppression and expulsion of the order, though it constantly reappeared with new names. In 1716 the French army was infested with Jesuitical and anti‑ Jesuitical societies.
“The Parliament of Paris suppressed them in 1762. They were abolished by papal bull in 1773 at the demand of France, Spain, Portugal, Parma, Naples and Austria. They are, however, still to be found everywhere, and they hold considerable property in England. A modern writer justly calls the 'Black International.
“Historically, the Jesuits are given credit for the Gunpowder Plot of 1605, fomenting the Thirty years war, the encouragement of the aspiration of Mary Stuart which led to her execution, the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes by Louis XIV, 1685, and numerous other great events of history. Which is no doubt true as the Protocols attest that the Jews have been behind every revolution and war in the world for more than a thousand years. The Sanfedesti was founded at the epoch of the suppression of the Jesuits for the defense of religion, the privileges and jurisdiction of Rome and the temporal power of the popes. Their successors were the Calderari. (Occult Theocracy, pp. 308‑318)
As you can clearly see the Jesuits is just another organization secret or otherwise that the jew use to hide behind whey they do their best to obey their god lucifer, and destroy the White Race, the True Israelites and children of Jacob/Israel - Willie Martin]
He started the Order in 1536. He was arrested by the Inquisition, and he was released, and he went to the Pope; he threw himself at the feet of the Pope. He would be completely at his service. The Pope chartered him, and that Pope was Pius III. The Pope chartered them, created the Jesuit Order; now he has Papal protection, and they began their awful history of deeds of blood. And war after war after war after war, they’re all attributed to the Jesuit Order in some way. Catholic nobles, with lots of money, donated castles and schools and money to the Jesuit Order.
Virtually everything they own has been given to them or stolen by them. Of course, they stole all of the fortunes of the Jews in World War II. They stole all their gold, all their assets and everything, whenever they went into a country. What’s just been released is NOTHING compared to what they’ve taken.
[Note here the author is lying about the jews money, the Catholics didn’t steal the jews money, it is the other way around; not only did they retain controll of the church they retained control of its assets as well - Willie Martin]
*************
In Edmond Paris’s book, printed by Ozark Publications, called The Vatican Against Europe, it gets into great detail of what they did. It calls it—the last 30 years of war is all attributable to the Jesuits, their massacres of the Serbs and Jews, etc. But Edmond Paris did not understand that the Jesuit General—and this is one of the most important points I want to make about Von Kolvenbach—the Jesuit General is in complete control of the international intelligence community: that’s the CIA, the FBI, the KGB, the Israeli Mossad, the German BND, the British SIS. The Jesuit General is in COMPLETE CONTROL of the entire intelligence apparatus—FBI, every bureaucratic agency in this country, all of it; he is in complete control of it.
So, whenever he wants to find something out about an individual, they put in the Social Security number, and everything from all of the intelligence apparatus kicks‑in and he and his provincials can review everything about that man. Credit cards, you name it, everything that’s attached to Rome’s social security number, which FDR put upon us in 1933 with the help of Spellman; at the time, I believe he was Archbishop, or maybe it was Cardinal Hayes—but Rome was behind FDR in putting him in office.
The couple of things that he did was implement social insecurity, the income tax, and recognizing Joseph Stalin’s bloody Jesuit USSR government. So, with the giving of us the Social Security number, that is Rome’s number—that’s why I refuse to use it—and that’s why they want everybody using it for everything: driver’s license, tax return, credit card, everything you do, that number is you and that number is Rome’s number.
Martin: Let me just back‑up here for a minute. What comes to mind is Louis Freeh, head of the FBI.
Phelps: Roman Catholic, good altar boy. Probably a Knight of Columbus; I can’t prove it. But anybody with that kind of power has got to be a Knight of Columbus.
[As you see the author of the book never admits and anyone is a jew, that they are all Catholics and well they might be but that does not mean they are not jews]
And the Knights of Columbus implement Jesuit politics. And Louis Freeh was the one behind the Waco atrocity and the Oklahoma City bombing atrocity. And his top sniper was a Japanese Roman Catholic named Lon Horiuchi.
So, it’s Roman Catholics in control, Knights in control of the FBI, who carried out all of this killing. And those two men, Louis Freeh and Lon Horiuchi are personally accountable to Cardinal O’Connor of New York. And Cardinal O’Connor of New York is the most powerful Cardinal in the country. He is the military vicar. And that’s why Bush kissed his fanny for going to Bob Jones, because Cardinal O’Connor is the King of the American Empire. And he rules his Empire from that Palace, St. Patrick’s Cathedral, “the little Vatican.”
Martin: And is he in contact, do you think, with Kolvenbach?
Phelps: Of course. O’Connor himself is not a Jesuit, but the Jesuits are like the SS of the Catholic Church. They maintain order.
And the ones closest to him who maintain order are the Jesuits of Fordham University. Now, one of them—the head of Fordham University, I believe he is an Irishman, is also a member of the CFR [Council on Foreign Relations]. And I have that right here in the Annual Report of the CFR of 1993. Those Jesuits at Fordham maintain semblance and rule over the Cardinal in New York. And, of course, the powerful Jesuits of Fordham include Avery Dulles and John Foster Dulles, one of the writers of the book on the Second Vatican Council.
Martin: Let’s back‑up now, let’s go back. What’s the Council of Trent?
Phelps: The Council of Trent was the response of Rome to the Protestant Reformation. Remember—the Protestant Reformation brought us all of the political liberty that we know of today. There’s no such thing as national sovereignty without the Reformation. There’s no such thing as private rights without the Reformation. There’s no such thing as the Law of Nations, as we know of it today, of Montesquieu and the others, without the Reformation.
So, when the Reformation came with their doctrines of salvation by grace through faith alone, and that there was no need for the priesthood to go to Heaven—that all we need is salvation in Christ, and Romans 1:17: the righteous shall live by faith. When the Reformation came, it completely stripped Rome of its spiritual power. The priests were no longer wanted because the people were getting the word of God in a Bible, specifically in Holland, England, and Germany. And so, with these great revivals breaking forth and the Reformation happening, nations were breaking away from the power of the Pope. The Holy Roman Empire was breaking up. Charles V, the Emperor, resigned and became a monk and a gardener. So, the Lord was moving mightily in breaking the power of the Holy Roman Empire, started by Charlemagne and the Pope.
Well, this was not good for Rome because they were losing lots of money. The nations were not
paying "Peter’s pence" anymore, which today we call "foreign aid" in this country. And so the Pope
was very upset about his.
What’s he going to do? These nations are breaking away from us; they’re not under our temporal or
spiritual power; and it’s very important to remember that the Pope claims two powers—spiritual and
temporal—and with the breaking of his spiritual power, he then lost his temporal power. In other
words, he no longer had the ability to rule the people through the king of the country, because the
king was breaking away, like Henry VIII.
So, Henry VIII broke away from the Roman Church and formed the Church of England; he no
longer was subject to the Pope. This was happening in England, in Germany, in Holland, and other
places.
As a result of this, the Devil raised up Ignatius Loyola with his demonisms, his "spiritual exercises"
and—because Loyola had been a member of the Spanish Alumbrados, which is what we call the
Illuminati today, and he used the Jesuit Order to attempt to regain back what had been taken by the
Reformation—what the Lord had done through Luther, Calvin, and Knox. And, by the way, Luther,
Calvin, and Knox—none of those men died violent deaths. They all lived to older age and died
peacefully, amidst the power of the Jesuit machinations.
The Council of Trent consists of 25 Sessions. Those 25 Sessions accurse and condemn all the
doctrines of the Reformation. It condemns anybody who does not believe that the literal Jesus Christ
is in the host [holy communion bread], and that his literal blood is in the wine. That’s called
transubstantiation. Anybody who does not believe that is an accursed anathema. Anybody who
believes that their salvation is outside the Catholic Church is accursed anathema. Anybody who
believes in justification by grace through faith—anathema, accursed. Anybody who believes that the
Pope is not the vicar of Christ—accursed, anathema. You see, all of these doctrines were being put
forth as a result of reading the Bible, which produced the Reformation, and so the Jesuits accursed
everything that the Reformers were preaching. This is all in Law called the Council of Trent.
In the 4th Session, which is probably the most important Session, the Jesuits condemn freedom of
speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of conscience. So, no man has the right to choose his
own religion; no man has the right to publish what he feels is the truth; and no man has the right to
freedom of conscience.
Those rights were secured by our Baptist/Calvinist forefathers in the First Amendment. The man
who wrote the First Amendment was James Madison, who was a Baptist/Calvinist, and he was
told by that Baptist/Calvinist in Virginia, Doc. John Leland: "If you don’t secure all those rights,
Virginia will not ratify the Constitution." Virginia was a Baptist/Calvinist state.
So, we have a warfare between the Council of Trent and the doctrines of the Reformation,
particularly as outlined by John Calvin in his Institutes Of The Christian Religion. Calvin [1536]
wrote the Institutes Of The Christian Religion, he finished it when he was 27, and he dedicated it
to the King of France. And because the Jesuits so hated him, he was driven from France and he
resided in Geneva to the day of his death, when he became Governor of Geneva. It’s Calvin and his
Institutes Of The Christian Religion vs. Loyola and his Council of Trent, if you want it sewed‑up
in two major documents.
Martin: Council of Trent was what year?
Phelps: From 1545‑1563, eighteen years. And Trent is a little town in Italy. So, it was a Council
that took place in the town of Trent, Italy.
The Presbyterian Westminster Confession And Faith that was finished in 1648, after the 30
Years War, is another extension of Calvin’s Institutes, and is what the Church of Scotland and the
Covenanters went by when they resisted the powers of Rome and England. That document is a
major document, and it’s not the new Westminster Confession, it’s the old one of 1648, where
they called the Pope the man of sin, that Roman Anti‑Christ, and they also denounced anti‑Christian
tyranny.
And that it is their duty, to use what they call "the sword of the spirit", which is the Word of God,
which we read in Ephesians, Chapter 6, and "the sword of just defense"—the gun, the sword.
So, us Calvinists believe that there is a time for peace and a time for war, and we do not refuse to go
to the battlefield when it’s necessary. It was the Calvinists who gave us our political liberty in
England with Cromwell. He was a Calvinist and an independent Baptist. It was Calvinists in Holland
who gave the Dutch their political liberty, with William of Orange, and later his son, Prince Maurice,
and then later, in our great country, when it was Washington, the Freemason who did not go into that
Masonic Lodge that last 30 years of his life—in his own words—who was a Baptist and a Calvinist.
He was baptized in the First Baptist Church of New York by one of his captains, Pastor Gano, all
surrounded by Calvinists.
That’s why they didn’t surrender at Valley Forge; that’s why, when they were naked, when they
went through the snow, barefoot, they endured that because they were Bible‑believing Calvinists and
they refused to submit to the tyranny of King George, who was controlled by the Jesuits.
And that is the soul of our country. If we lose that soul, we’ve lost everything. And those very same
Baptists, in the Second Amendment, secured their right to bear arms, because they secured the
right, the "sword of just defense". And the "sword of the spirit" is contained in the First
Amendment, the right to have the Bible never taken from them. The two swords of Calvinism are
secured in the First and Second Amendments. Without those first two Amendments, all the others
are nothing.
Martin: Well, I got to my question #2. So, let’s go to #3 of the seventy. (laughter)
How does Shriner Freemason President Harry Truman’s signing into law of the Emergency War
Powers Act of 1950 factor into the Jesuit Agenda?
Phelps: First of all, Harry Truman, who the Japanese called "Dirty Harry"—when they heard the
movie Dirty Harry came out, they thought it was a movie about Harry Truman, according to my
Japanese pastor friend, Daniel Fuji, who has passed away.
Harry Truman was put in office by the Jesuits, the Pensergast Democratic machine in Missouri.
Harry Truman takes over after FDR’s murder, because he was murdered in the home of Bernard
Baruch. When he did that, he then finished up the war with the hoax called the dropping of the
nuclear bombs, to purposely create this greater hoax called the Cold War, that would enable the
Vatican to knock over country after country after country, and replace the leaders with dictators,
subordinate to the Pope. That was the purpose of the Cold War.
And so, when Harry Truman in 1950 signed into law the Emergency War Powers Act, the Cold
War was in full force. They were building bomb shelters, etc. So the nation was in kind of a frenzy.
When he signed this into law, it put the whole country under military or martial law, and that’s when
the flags in every courtroom, state and federal, began to be changed. And every state flag and every
U.S. flag is now trimmed in gold fringe. And whenever you see a flag trimmed in gold fringe, that
means that it is the flag of the Commander‑in‑Chief. Now, if it’s the state flag, it means that’s the flag
of the governor, as Commander‑in‑Chief. And if it’s the federal flag, or the national flag, more
correctly, it’s the flag of the Commander‑in‑Chief in Washington.
So, all your courts are nothing more than courts of military rule. They all proceed with summary
procedures. The jury has no power of jury nullification. And they are simply enforcing the laws of the
Empire, which I call 14th Amendment America, which is a military‑style, King of England‑style
country. The courts are nothing more than courts of the king’s bench, as you can see in
Blackstone’s Commentaries.
And the banks, as you walk into every bank, they all have a flag trimmed in gold fringe. The bank is
what England would call, in Blackstone’s day, the king’s bank. So, we have the king’s bank, and we
have the king’s bench. And it’s run according to military rule, according to Berkheimer’s great work
Military Rule And Martial Law, published in 1914.
When Harry Truman did this, there was a consummation of a great plan to put us under the
Emergency War Powers Act and, actually, a war rule. "Daylight savings time" is what was called
"war time". This country only went to daylight savings time during World War II, and they called it,
at that time, war time. So, nothing’s changed. We’ve never gone back to not turning back our
clocks. We’re still on war time. The income tax is a war tax. It was called a victory tax in 1942.
So, people are paying a war tax, they’re under war time, they’re under an emergency war powers
act, and the courts are war courts.
Martin: Regarding the assassination of President John Kennedy, which could take this entire
interview, you say that the assassination was ordered by the Jesuit General, executed by Pope Paul
VI, and carried out by the "American Pope", Francis Cardinal Spellman—who, in turn, used the
Knights of Malta, Shriner Freemasons, Knights of Columbus, and Mafia Dons, including the FBI
and CIA, to carry out the order from Rome. Would you explain why you believe your particular
theory on the assassination to be an accurate representation of the facts?
Phelps: Sure. Alright, number one: The powers that be are properly outlined [in his book], and
proven through two centuries of showing how it’s all been put together. Now, as to why, I will be
conservative and stick with Fletcher Prouty’s reasons, that he outlined in his JFK and also his other
book called The Secret Team.
The reason why Kennedy was assassinated was he wanted to end the Vietnam War, and he wanted
to end the rule of the CIA. That begets two questions: Did Rome want the Vietnam War? And, did
Rome control the CIA? The answer is yes on both counts.
We know, on its face, that the Vietnam War was called "Spelly’s War"—Cardinal Spellman’s war.
He went over to the warfront many times and he called the American soldiers the "soldiers of
Christ". The man who was the Commander of the American forces was a Roman Catholic, CFR
member, possibly a Knight of Columbus, I don’t know, but he was General William Westmoreland.
So, Westmoreland was Cardinal Spellman’s agent to make sure that war was prosecuted properly.
And another overseer of Westmoreland was Cardinal Spellman’s boy, Lyndon Baines Johnson.
Lyndon Baines Johnson was a 33rd‑degree Freemason. He was also part of the assassination, with
J. Edgar Hoover, another 33rd‑degree Freemason.
And Johnson went to Cardinal Spellman’s death at St. Patrick’s Cathedral, and the picture can be
seen in Cooney’s work The American Pope. So, Johnson was completely at the beck and call of
Cardinal Spellman through Cartha DeLoach, the 3rd‑in‑control of the FBI. According to Curt
Gentry, in his Hoover: The Man And The Secrets, DeLoach had a phone at his bedside direct to
Johnson, and Johnson could call him anytime. DeLoach was a Knight of Malta, subject to Spellman.
Spellman wanted the Vietnam War, why? Spellman was controlled by the Jesuits of Fordham. Why
did the Jesuit General want the Vietnam War? The people of Vietnam, the Buddhists, were
unconvertible. They would not convert to Catholicism. They didn’t need Rome.
There had been a Jesuit presence in Vietnam for centuries, so it had been decided that about a
million or so Buddhists would have to be "purged". They would later continue this purge of
Cambodia, with Pol Pot, and the purge is yet for Thailand. It was a purging of Laos, Cambodia, and
Vietnam of all these Buddhists, just like they purged the Buddhists of China with Mao Zedong,
because Mao Zedong was completely controlled by the Jesuits. So, they wanted the Vietnam War.
The other thing is that Rome is in control of the drug trade. The Vatican controls all of the drug
trade—all of the heroin, all of the opium, all of the cocaine, everything going around in Columbia.
Columbia has a concordat with the Pope. A concordat is a treaty with the Pope. Hitler had a
concordat. Mussolini had a concordat. Franco had a concordat. They want to set up a concordat
here, which was the reason for Reagan formally recognizing the sovereign state of Vatican City in
1984. The greatest traitor we ever had was Ronald Reagan.
So, they had a concordat. Columbia has a concordat. Do you think that drugs running out of
Columbia, with a country that has a concordat with Rome, is not controlled by Rome? If Rome
didn’t want the drug trade out of Columbia, they’d end the concordat. The whole drug trade is run
by high Mafia families out of the country of Columbia, subject to the Jesuit General.
And the Jesuit General ran the Opium trade, a couple of centuries ago, out of China. They ran the
silk trade, the pearl trade. The movie Shogun is but a slight scratching of the surface of the Jesuit
"black ships" that trafficked in all of this silk and pearls and gold and opals and everything they could
pull out of the East, including opium.
The Vietnam War was to consolidate and control this huge massive drug‑trade that would inundate
every American city with drugs, being brought in by the CIA with their Air America, and then
distributed by the Trafficante family throughout the United States—Santos Trafficante out of Miami.
So we have the Mafia and the CIA working together in the drug trade. We have the Mafia and the
CIA working together in the assassination of Kennedy.
The first reason why the Jesuit General [at that time, Jean‑Baptist Janssens] wanted Kennedy out
of the way was because he was going to end the Vietnam War.
The second reason is, he wanted to end the reign of the CIA, because the CIA had betrayed him in
the person of McGeorge Bundy, by not giving the cover to the Cuban patriots to retake Cuba from
that Roman Catholic, Jesuit‑trained, grease‑ball bastard—he was a bastard, his father was a
Nazi—Fidel Castro.
Kennedy was betrayed by the CIA at the Bay of Pigs invasion, which sacrificed all the patriots on
the shores of the Bay of Pigs there, so Castro had no real opposition. This was the same tactic, used
by the CIA and the KGB at the top, working together with Angleton controlling it, in the Hungarian
Revolution, when the CIA fomented that revolution, and then betrayed all of those patriots into the
hands of the Soviet army and KGB, which infuriated certain top CIA officials.
It’s the same tactic: you raise up a revolution and you sacrifice the men who truly want to resist.
When that happened, when McGeorge Bundy stopped the air cover of the Bay of Pigs invasion, that
ended that resistance to Castro and it enthroned him into power. And, of course, it was meant to be
by the Jesuits because they HAD trained him. So now Kennedy looks bad. He’s got egg all over his
face. What does he want to do? He signs a Memorandum, according to Fletcher Prouty, and takes
all of the power away from the CIA, and gives it to the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
The CIA was built by the Knights of Malta. One of the founders of the CIA was "Wild" Bill
Donovan, an Irish Roman Catholic, who are the most fanatical, and his brother was a Dominican
priest, Vincent. So, the CIA was founded by this high Roman Catholic, the first head, to solidify the
Catholic or the Vatican control of it.
I’m not against the Catholic people; I’m against Rome’s hierarchy. The American Catholic people
know NOTHING of what’s going on. And if they did, there would be a march on St. Patrick’s
tomorrow morning. So, as I’m against the hierarchy, I’m showing that Kennedy was against the
Vietnam War, and he was going to do away with the CIA.
Well, the Jesuits had brought in all of their top Nazi SS soldiers into the CIA because the Jesuits
were using the SS to kill the Jews in Europe. When the Einsatzgruppen went into Russia, the Jesuits
followed with the SS and purged Western Russia of all its Jews. That’s why Stalin deliberately killed
40,000 of his best officers. That’s why he kicked out his best generals, purged them, because he
wanted to make sure that the Red Army would lose with the advance of the German army, because
following that would come the SS and purge Russia of the Jews that Stalin so hated. And by the
way, justice is often poetic because Stalin’s daughter married a Jew.
Now, the CIA was composed of the SS. The CIA now was an arm—and the intelligence arm—of
the Vatican. The Knights of Malta were throughout. Casey was a Knight of Malta. Angleton was a
Knight of Malta. The Knights were through and through. Angleton manned the "Vatican desk", and
that is a desk within the CIA that has a direct link to the Vatican.
So, Kennedy wanted to end this "intelligence community". That was the end of him.
Thus for anyone attempting to end the CIA, and attempting to end the Vietnam War, and also
because he attacked the Jesuits’ Federal Reserve Bank by printing United States Notes, they got rid
of him. They killed our only Roman Catholic president.
And it’s another piece of poetic justice that a Roman Catholic—not Protestants, like Harry Truman,
FDR, and others—it’s a Roman Catholic who truly sought to resist the temporal power of the Pope
in this country. And in many ways, even though Kennedy was, in fact, a socialist and communist, at
least he resisted the temporal power of the Pope. And for that we should be thankful and remember
his name.
But what have they done to his name? They’ve slammed it. They drag it into the dirt. Every time you
see it on TV, they parade before you his womanizing, which I don’t deny, but my goodness, can’t
we give him some credit where credit is due? That’s why they got rid of John F. Kennedy.
And then, of course, as soon as he’s assassinated, John McCone, the head of the CIA, the following
day goes to the White House and they reverse Kennedy’s Memorandum of reversing the Vietnam
War and make a full‑scale, carte blache war.
The CIA then is tremendously and heavily funded, because it was a CIA war. And there they tried
all of their new technology, their anti‑gravity machines, their men who they’re trying to make like the
"million‑dollar man". They tried out all their new technology in Vietnam. It was a great experimental
theater, and Kennedy knew this. He knew it, and he knew that the American people had no idea
what was going down, and he still tried to resist it, against his father’s warnings. Because his father
was the most powerful Knight of Malta in the Empire.
Martin: Any theories on why they took out junior?
Phelps: Yes. According to Tom Kuncle, in his publication, John F. Kennedy, Jr. wanted to find his
father’s real killers, and he had the power to publish the conclusion. So, they took him out right
away. They would not allow that to happen.
Martin: Why haven’t you been taken out?
Phelps: Because I am immortal—until the Lord is done with me. I am a Calvinist and a Baptist, and
we believe in the sovereignty of God. And as long as we are operating in His Will, they cannot touch
us, regardless of their power.
Martin: Which is why we’re having this conversation.
Phelps: Which is why we’re having the conversation. Don’t think for one moment they’re not
tapping this phone. They know this. The issue is here. We’re talking about a providential, sovereign
God who wishes to move, using second causes, men, just as the Devil does.
The Devil always uses second causes, men. So, it’s one group of men vs. another group of men, and
one path leads to evil, and the true, almighty God leads to goodness.
The problem is, with us, there are very few men who want to believe God anymore. Nobody
believes He can deliver anymore. It’s just a handful of us who say: "Well, we’re going to do His Will;
we’re going to trust Him in His Power."
And like the Hebrews getting ready to be thrown into the fiery furnace of Nebuchadnezzar, our God
is able to deliver us. We’re going to tell the truth!
Martin: Let’s see here. I can throw away a lot of these questions. So much of it seems, in a way,
irrelevant to our current times because there’s so much going on now. But, good grief! I was just
stunned to read in your book of all the historical things that have happened as a result of these evil
people. You dedicated the book to four Roman Catholics who, I’m sure, no one has ever heard of:
Charles Chiniquy, Jeremiah Crowley, Emmett McLaughlin, and Alberto Rivera. Why them?
Phelps: Because those Roman Catholic men were priests; they left the priesthood and told the truth
about what was really happening. And all four of them, except one, I think Emmett McLaughlin, paid
with their life. Chiniquy was the great exposer of the Jesuit assassination of President Lincoln, when
he wrote his masterpiece Fifty Years In The Church Of Rome in 1886. He proves that Lincoln was
assassinated by the Jesuits, and that it was covered‑up by our government at the time.
Jeremiah Crowley: that priest was a great Irishman who came here and, seeing the corruption of the
Archdiocese in Chicago, that it was so corrupt, he left it and exposed it. And, of course, he later
came to Christ and became a Bible‑believer, which they would call a Protestant. Protestants today
don’t believe the Bible. Protestantism of today is an empty shell, it’s nothing. But, back then, in
1912, they believed the Bible.
Crowley, then, exposed many things, and one of the things he exposed, that helped me with this, was
that he warned that the Jesuits, with their Knights of Columbus—which, he says, the Knights of
Columbus, named after Columbus, who he tells us was a Spanish Jew and a pirate and a deflowerer
of young girls—that Columbus was no Christian.
He has a tremendous section in his book on Columbus. That the purpose of the Knights of
Columbus was to fulfill Jesuitical politics, and part of those politics was to restore the temporal
power of the Pope because, you remember, the Pope had lost that in 1870 and they wanted to get it
back. And they got it back with Mussolini in 1929.
Well, in the book that Crowley wrote in 1912, he says that Taft and Teddy Roosevelt were all
cow‑towing to the Pope and the Cardinals of New York. And he said they’re going to use our
military to restore the Pope’s temporal power around the world.
And THAT was absolutely correct. That is American foreign policy. And the Council of Trent is the
American foreign policy of today. That’s what’s going on in Serbia and Bosnia. It’s the Council of
Trent—the Jesuits using the American Air Force to bomb those orthodox people to smithereens.
But, that was Crowley’s great contribution.
Next, Emmett McLaughlin wrote several books. He wrote The People’s Padre; he wrote Crime
And Immorality In The Catholic Church, showing that Catholic nations are more lawless and
more criminal than Protestant nations, and he proved it with statistics from the jails.
Emmett McLaughlin also wrote another book called The Assassination Of Abraham Lincoln,
where he, again, shows that Lincoln was assassinated by the Jesuits. So, Emmett McLaughlin came
out of the Catholic Church. To my knowledge, he never was born again. He never was saved, but
he did tell the truth. He married a nun, and lived a virtuous and honorable life after he left.
The last one was, of course, Alberto Rivera, who was greatly hated by the Vatican because he was
a very high Jesuit who came out and, in the late ’60s, about 1969, exposed the power of Rome in
the ecumenical movement, that Rome controlled Kathryn Kuhlman; that Rome controlled Billy
Graham; that Rome controlled, virtually, our government—Ronald Reagan.
Reagan, when he took the Oath of Office, faced the obelisk, indicating that this country will
ultimately have a concordat. So, Alberto Rivera converted to Christ, wonderfully, and he started a
ministry called The Anti‑Christ Information Center, out of Los Angeles.
They tried to kill him five times. A dentist jammed a needle up between his teeth, trying to give him
an infection in the brain. When he passed out, about a year or so later, they couldn’t figure it out.
Everybody was praying for him. And this was discovered when he went to another dentist. He had it
removed.
He was pushed in front of a subway train. They tried five times to kill the man, and finally he died, I
believe, of cancer, in a hospital, about three years ago. But these four wonderful, great, Catholic
priests did their best to expose the power of Rome and its attempts to destroy our sovereign,
Protestant, Bible‑believing nation. And so, to them, I dedicate it.
Martin: What compelled you to write this book? What started it for you?
Phelps: I was always taught to be a patriot, a patriot first and foremost—America first, and
everybody else second. Later, when I came to know the Lord, at 17, I realized the Bible taught the
same thing—that the Lord had instituted nations. The Lord never instituted world governments;
that’s always the result of the Devil’s working.
So, being a patriot and a nationalist—believing in national sovereignty—I was saved at 17, went into
the Air Force, was garrisoned in a nuclear weapons area for three years in Germany, came back and
started to go to Bible college.
When I went to Bible college, the issue of the King James came up, as far as it being an archaic
version. And that’s what I used and I had never given it a thought. Well, some were using NIV,
some NASB, and I thought: "Well, maybe it’s just a modern version of what I have here." And I
thought: "Well, if they want to use that, that’s fine, but I’ll use the King James."
I found that the underlying Greek text for the King James, the Textus Receptus, was the Greek text
of the Reformation. It represents 95% of the existing manuscripts that we have today. The Greek
text that underlies all these other versions—there’s a Westcott and Hort Greek text, which I then
discovered was really a conspiracy to adulterate the Textus Receptus in England, led by Brooke
Foss Westcott and Anthony Hort, who were Maryolitors, Mary‑worshippers.
Later, I found out that they had invited Cardinal Newman to sit in on the revision committee. Well,
Cardinal Newman was a traitor to the Anglican Church, with his Track 90, which blew‑off the
Anglican Church. He then left England and he was then a Cardinal by Pius IX.
So, here we have Cardinal Newman, and E. B. Pusey, had been invited to sit on this revision
committee, the end result being a Greek text that had been produced that was pro‑Jerome’s Latin
Vulgate. Jerome’s Latin Vulgate is the basis for the Jesuit’s Reheims‑Douay text, that was put out
in 1582, that was attempting to rival William Tyndale’s English text, which later became the King
James Version of 1611.
So now I see this awful Jesuit hand in my Bible college, attempting to deprive me of the Word of
God, the authorized version of 1611, in it’s present edition of 1769. Now I thought "Well, here the
Jesuits are, what else have they done?" And the next thing I was led to was the Lincoln assassination.
And I can remember reading Burke McCarty’s The Suppressed Truth About The Assassination
Of Abraham Lincoln, and weeping in the back room, when I was in college.
Martin: For me, one of the most compelling portions of your book was the series of revelations
about Lincoln. I was stunned by that.
Phelps: That’s what they did. Remember, Lincoln was not going to go along with the 14th
Amendment. He wanted those Southern states to re‑enter the Union on the same footing that they
had left, which would have left us with a federal Republic as Washington had established it. This the
Jesuits would not allow. It would be converted into an Empire. The states would be subordinate
provinces to Washington. And the 14th Amendment would accomplish this with the reversion of
citizenship. And Lincoln was re‑elected, and he was ready to end this, and that’s why they killed
him. Kennedy was ready to implement his things; they would not let him be re‑elected.
Martin: This is a total aside. Have you ever come across The Jefferson Bible?
Phelps: The Jefferson Bible—and maybe you know this—is Matthew, Mark, and Luke. And
Thomas Jefferson, being the Deist, being the pagan that he was, cut out all the supernatural from
those three gospels. Jefferson was a Deist; he was involved with the French Freemasons who were
involved in the French Revolution, and he was not here at the writing of our Protestant Constitution.
So, the Lord put him out of the picture. Jefferson was just used to help with the
Revolution—because the Lord does use the unGodly for good things. But Jefferson copied much of
the Declaration Of Independence from the Mechlenburg Declaration, written by Calvinistic
Presbyterians of North Carolina, when they seceded, when that county of Mechlenburg seceded
from the Colonies.
Martin: Never heard of it.
Phelps: Yes, you’ll find it in Presbyterian writings. You can find it from D. James Kennedy; he has a
thing on it. And Jefferson copied, at the end: "...and to this end we devote our lives, our fortunes,
and our sacred honor."
That was copied directly from the Mechlenburg Declaration. Jefferson was a plagiarist; he was a
high Freemason; and he was out of here at the time of the writing of our Constitution. And the
reason why the people of Virginia did elect him to office was because he was a State’s Rights man.
He wanted limited powers in Washington, and that was a good thing. And when Jefferson was
elected, he undid everything the king‑president John Adams did, with his Alien & Sedition Laws,
because John Adams wanted to be a king, and Jefferson undid it, and Jefferson got two terms for
that.
Martin: I’m looking at some things that are a little further back now. The Secreta Monita. What’s
the significance of that?
Phelps: The Secret Instructions [excerpts at the end of this interview] are the handbooks that are
given to the professed Jesuits, those under extreme oath. [The oath is presented in full at the end
of this interview.] And it tells them how to conduct their plans, subjugating peoples and nations to
the Jesuit General, and thus, to the temporal power of the Pope. It tells how they are to deceive. It
shows how they are to swindle rich widows out of their fortunes, like they did with Astor’s second
wife who survived the Titanic catastrophe. It shows their general approach on how to do things.
This particular book cannot be known, and if it’s ever published, they will deny it’s existence. But
when you see the works that the Jesuits have done, it’s in complete agreement with the Secreta
Monita.
There is a very interesting section in Edwin R. Sherwin’s book The Engineer Core Of Hell, written
in 1886 I believe—another suppressed work. It’s usually in the archives of all the older libraries
back here. And he shows how this Secreta Monita was discovered in South America by a Mason,
and the Mason managed to escape to a lodge after being shot. He turned the Secreta Monita over
to the lodge, and then these certain Freemasons saw the Secreta Monita. There are certain
low‑level Freemasons who believe that the Jesuit Order is their enemy, so that’s why it was taken to
the lodge and then published. But the high‑level Masons, of course, work with them. The Secreta
Monita was discovered once that way. It was published in Holland. Then, in 1857, reprinted by
England.
Martin: Pascal’s Provincial Letters had a devastating impact on exposing the Jesuits. Why?
Phelps: Blaise Pascal was a Huguenot, a French Calvinist. So here we have another fearless man.
He doesn’t fear death; he’s going to tell the truth. So Blaise Pascal wrote a series of letters that were
written to and from provincials, and he wrote them in a satirical manner, that of course excited that
wonderful French mind. The French, of course, came to the conclusion that this was absolutely the
truth, and then they moved to suppress the Jesuits again. But his Provincial Letters are considered
a classic. Blaise Pascal also wrote some other great works, too.
Martin: Pope Ganganelli‑Clement XIV abolished the Order entirely in 1773, and was murdered as
a result.
Phelps: Correct; he was poisoned.
Martin: The Order was similarly abolished 39 times from different kingdoms throughout Europe. It
doesn’t take a genius to figure out that something was terribly wrong with this group!
Phelps: Right. Are all those people bigots? Are all those people brainwashed bigots and fanatical
Protestants who abolished the Jesuit Order?
You find the greatest resistance to the Jesuits in Catholic countries, by Catholic monarchs. And
that’s why the Roman Catholic monarchs and nobility of today don’t dare resist them. The
Kennedys won’t touch them. The monarchs of Europe won’t touch them. The Hapsburgs won’t
touch them, because the Jesuits have vindicated their power in the French Revolution and the
Napoleonic Wars—well, then they went to suppress the Jesuits again in Europe and they were, for
the most part, kicked‑out of Europe in the 1800s. All the nations of Europe banned them. Germany
banned them in 1872. And so, World War I and II, the second Thirty Years War, was pay‑back for
this. And ever since then, nobody touches them.
Pope Ganganelli abolished the Jesuits with a Papal Bull; the Jesuits call it a "brief". It is not a brief; it
is in the Library of the Bulls, and it is called Dominic Ac Redemptor Nostor. That is the name of a
bull. And when he abolished them, he abolished them forever—that they were not to talk about their
abolition, that they were not to teach. He confiscated all of their wealth and land and property. For
the most part, the Dominicans took it over, which is why the Dominicans had their penis cut off
during the French Revolution. That’s what the Jacobins did to them. It was payback by the Jesuits:
"You don’t dare take our property from us, boy. And you don’t dare take Inquisition from us."
Jacobins killed nearly every Dominican in France.
Martin: Why was the assassination of William of Orange so significant?
Phelps: Williams of Orange was the father of religious liberty. William of Orange is the man who
gave the Jews the freedom to come to Amsterdam. And the Jews called Amsterdam, "the new
Jerusalem". William of Orange was a Catholic to begin with. Remember when he was in the forest,
hunting with the king of France, and the king of France lay bare to him their plans to destroy all the
Protestants in Holland, William kept silent. And that’s why he was called "William the taciturn" or
"William the silent".
So, he harbored all of this in his heart, and he went back to Holland determined that he would
deliver the Calvinists and the Protestants from this annihilation. William went to Germany with his
German wife, and he, according to Motley in his The Dutch Republic, raised an army of Germans
and they did not succeed in liberating Holland. And so, it was the Dutch themselves who joined
William of Orange in an attempt to liberate the country, which they ultimately did as the "wild
beggars of the sea".
So, William was a great inspiration. He delivered flight from the seige of the fanatical Roman
Catholic Spanish, lead by the Jesuits, when the Lord providentially delivered and sent a strong wind
over the dikes, and flooded the whole area, and flooded the Spanish soldiers.
And then, after that happened, He sent another strong West wind and blew the water back over the
dikes. This is a historical fact! Why don’t we hear this in history? For the same reason we don’t hear
when Louis XIV brought his army across the river into Holland to kill all those Dutch, in 1672, right
around there, that the river, right where the army was crossing, thawed out, and the whole French
army went to the bottom of the river, as a result of the prayers of those Protestants of Holland.
We’re not taught that either!
The assassination of William of Orange was probably the second most significant act of Jesuit
dominance, next to the murder of Coligny at St. Bartholomew’s Massacre. Because it was first St.
Bartholomew’s massacre, and then the murder of William of Orange. And, of course, William of
Orange was shot by a Jesuit‑controlled assassin, Balthazar Girard, in his own house. And the last
words of William, of course, were: "God be merciful to these poor people."
Martin: What is the Royal Institute of International Affairs?
Phelps: The Royal Institute of International Affairs is the same as the American Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR). The Royal Institute runs England and the British Empire, what was once the
extension of the British, just as the CFR runs our country. They’re sister organizations.
Martin: Where are they based?
Phelps: They’re based in London.
Martin: And who is their head; do you know?
Phelps: I don’t know right now. The John Birch Society wrote a lot about that, and they did expose
the CFR and the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Allan Stang has written a lot about that.
Martin: What was the "Gunpowder Plot" of 1605?
Phelps: The Gunpowder Plot of 1605 was the Jesuits attempt to destroy what William Howitt—and
Howitt was the great writer who wrote A Popular History Of Priestcraft, 1835—he said it was a
Jesuit attempt to destroy our Great King Solomon, King James I, along with the entire Protestant
Parliament. Because remember, Elizabeth I had expelled the Jesuits from her empire, and if they
were ever caught they were to be drawn and quartered.
After she died, the conspiracy went on there that went on with William Cecil. They named Mary
Queen of Scott’s son as the King of England, rather than Elizabeth’s son, because Elizabeth had a
son who was the Earl of South Hampton, Wriothesley, and that was the son of Edward Devere,
who we know as William Shakespeare.
There was no William Shakespeare. The man was Edward Devere. He ran the Globe Theater. He
was the Lord Great Chamberlain to Queen Elizabeth, and he secretly had a son who was the Third
Earl of South Hampton. He was the rightful heir to the thrown, not King James VI of Scotland.
You can find all this documented in two great works: the first is called Shakespeare Identified and
the author is Looney. The explosion of that book is called This Star Of England, written by Carlton
and Dorothy Ogborn, in 1952, and it’s a 1200‑page work, and in it they explain all the plays of
Shakespeare, and that they are, in the words of Hamlet: "A brief abstract and chronicle of the times."
Nothing but history.
And then there’s another book, Wasn’t Shakespeare Someone Else?, written by Tweeny, and in
that book he evaluates the 150 sonnets. In those sonnets Edward Devere put his name: Vere or
Uvre or Vere—he puts his name in acrostics throughout all the sonnets. And the last couple sonnets
he puts his name in double acrostics. It’s amazing, showing that he wrote the sonnets.
Martin: Why were the Jesuits so upset about the Edict of Nantes, and what was it’s significance?
Phelps: Ok, the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes—it can be spelled Nantes or Nantz. Anyway,
the Edict of Nantes was put forward by King Henry IV. King Henry IV was a Roman Catholic, but
he converted to Protestantism and he became a Huguenot. But he was not allowed to take the
throne of France until he renounced his Protestantism. So, for the sake of the kingdom, he
renounced his Protestantism, and in 1610, I believe, issued forth the Edict of Nantes.
The Edict of Nantes guaranteed religious freedom to all the French. That included the Protestant,
Calvinist, Huguenots, which of course included those who would have followed Admiral Coligny,
who the Jesuits murdered with that she‑wolf, Catherine de Medici. With the Edict of Nantes we
have religious liberty in France. This cannot be. France is a cornerstone of Jesuit power, so it cannot
allow this to be in place. The Council of Trent condemns it, because it’s freedom of conscience.
So, after they murder Henry IV with Ravaillac, when they stabbed him through his heart, according
to Sully in his memoirs, they murdered Henry IV for this, and also for attempting to reinforce the
Dutch. They then, in 1685—when the Beatles are singing about the "Sun King" in their "white"
album, they’re singing about Louis XIV. And that’s telling you that the Beatles are Jesuit‑controlled.
The Sun King, Louis XIV who reigned, who rules over France for, I believe, 60 years, he, because
of his Jesuit confessor, Pere La Chaise, revokes the Edict of Nantes, and with that, no more religious
freedom in France.
And then they sent their French dragons out and beheaded and killed every Huguenot they could
find, driving 500,000 Frenchmen out of the country, the wealth of France, the manhood of France,
all left for Holland and England. That destroyed France. From then on, France became a nothing
nation.
The French Revolution could never have happened had not the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes
taken place. Because now, there’s no Bible in France. And to this day, the French have never
published a French version of the Textus Receptus. Number one, all French Bibles have been
produced in foreign countries, when they’ve been translated from the Greek Textus Receptus into
French; France has never done it. That shows the Jesuit power over France to this day.
And the French have probably been the most manly, the strongest, the most gracious, the most
determined in kicking the Jesuits out of their country. They’ve kicked them out, to my knowledge,
three times—and again, they come back, foment wars, kill off the rulers, etc. Drive Eugene Sue into
exile; he dies of a broken heart. Drive Calvin into exile; he can never return to France. All the great
Frenchmen are driven into exile.
So we have, as American patriots, we have a great camaraderie for the French. They helped us in
our American Revolution. And why did they help us? Because they’ve been expelled from France.
Why did Spain help us? Why did they help finance our Revolution? The Jesuits had been expelled
from Spain. So payback came for Spain and France, for helping this heretic, Protestant nation come
into existence, with the Napoleonic Wars, when they killed Louis XVI and drove the Bubons from
the Spanish thrown. That was payback.
Martin: For 30 years of war, from 1618‑1648, you state that the Jesuits, through Ferdinand II,
killed‑off 10 million people. That’s quite a statement.
Phelps: That statement comes from Ridpath’s History Of The World, published in 1899. And that
is his encyclopedia of his history of the world. That was common knowledge in 1899. The 30 Years
War was hell on Earth for Europe. Two‑thirds of Germany was brought back to Rome. It was
leveled, plundered, and destroyed.
Wallenstein and Tilly were the fanatical Roman Catholic generals who raped, pillaged, and plundered
everything in their path. But the Lord raised up certain great generals like Gustavus Adolphus from
Sweden. He was called the "Snow King" and he was the one who ultimately, he paved the way for
the victory of the 30 Years War.
But without that Protestant victory of the 30 Years War, the peace of Westphalia, which the Pope
was not invited to, there would have been no modern era as we know it today. According to any
historian, the modern era begins in 1648. That is when the 80 Year War in Holland ended with
Spain. That is when the 30 Years War ended with Ferdinand II and the Protestants of Germany, and
Sweden, and so‑on.
1648 is the wonderful year in which the Modern Era began, when inventors could go to Germany
and say: "Well, you know, maybe the Earth isn’t flat." And maybe Leeuwenhoek could invent the
microscope in Holland, and now, later on, James Clerk Maxwell, who was a Bible‑believing,
Protestant Presbyterian, he can write his treatise called Electricity And Magnetism, the father of
what we know today about electricity and magnetism. Now, science can blossom and bloom. Now
we can have literature. Now we can have great writers, like Sir Walter Scott, who writes great
works like Ivanhoe and Peveril Of The Peak. Now we can have Charles Dickens, another
Protestant, who writes A Tale Of Two Cities, one of London and the other of Rome. We have
great literature surfacing as a result of the Modern Era.
But the Jesuits, in their determination to destroy the Reformation and the Modern Era and bring us
back to the Dark Ages, seek to reverse the effects of the Modern Era, and thus, what was brought
about by the 30 Years War. And to know the 30 Years War is to understand the second 30 Years
War, which started in 1914 and ended in 1945.
Martin: In 1639, the Jesuits were also expelled from Japan. Apparently the Jesuits never forgot
that.
Phelps: They never forgot it. For over 200 years they have been expelled. And remember the
words of Lincoln: "The Jesuits never forget nor forsake."
So, payback time was coming for Japan. The Emperor had expelled them, so that dynasty was
targeted. Ultimately, the Emperor would be destroyed or his dynasty would end. And so payback
time was the mass fire‑bombings by the American Air Force, financed by the Jesuits, as the Jesuits
own Lockheed, Boeing, McDonald‑Douglas, and Grumman, and they used their B‑29 to firebomb
Japan to smithereens. You can get the fact that the Jesuits control these aircraft companies from
Avro Manhattan’s The Vatican Billions.
Martin: I’m trying to get a little more current here, but some of this older stuff is also so fascinating,
I’m going back and forth here. Our readers are just going to have to be a little flexible in their
reading. (laughter)
Phelps: Right.
Martin: In 1649 there was the Irish Massacre. What was it, and let’s discuss the hatred between
the Protestants and Catholics in Ireland, as a result of the Irish Massacre.
Phelps: Ok. Of course, we believe in freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, freedom of the
press. That is an outgrowth of Protestantism, because all Protestants were defending their right to
believe the Bible in the face of Rome’s expectations to believe the priests and the decrees of the
Popes.
Many of the Irish were born‑again. They came to know the Lord. Much preaching was done up
there. In fact, Patrick, of St. Patrick’s Day, was no Catholic. He was a Protestant. And so, he was a
great Protestant preacher of Ireland, and many, many Irish came to know the Lord. And their point
of location was primarily in the North, in Northern Ireland, which today is Ulster, Belfast, etc.
Well, the Jesuits, in fulfilling their Bloody Oath that we are making and waging relentless war on all
Protestants, and all political liberals, they hatched‑out the plot to kill all the Irish Protestants in
Ireland with the O’Neil family. And I wonder if that O’Neil family was related to Tip O’Neil?
In 1641, the massacre began, carried out by Roman Catholic nobles and the mobs in Ireland. When
they started that massacre, it continued from 1641 to 1649. The massacre ended when they killed
150,000, but they still taught the Catholic children to kill the Protestant children. So, Irish Protestants
were being massacred, enmasse, for 8 years.
This is NEVER told whenever anybody is ever talking about Oliver Cromwell, when Cromwell
came up with his Puritan Army and ended that, when he took Drogheda, and killed every living thing
in Drogheda—men, women, children, animal, everything.
Ones say: "Oh, the beast Oliver Cromwell. Look what he did to Drogheda!" What about those
beasts killing those Irish Protestants for 8 years, bashing out the brains of the little babies, smashing
them up against the walls like they did, led by the priests?
This was just like they did in Croatia with the Serbs in World War II, when they gouged‑out the
eyes of all the Serbians, where one particular priest had 23 kilos worth of eyes. They were doing the
same thing to the Irish Protestants.
So, when Cromwell came up, and it was vengeance for the Irish Massacre, and the Irish Massacre
was NOT started by the Protestants, it was started by the Jesuits according to Fox’s Book Of
Martyrs. And you can find the whole narration there, which was a classic that all Englishmen used to
read with the King James Bible.
Martin: Do you believe that Great Britain is truly Protestant‑controlled, Jewish‑controlled, or
Jesuit‑controlled?
Phelps: Jesuit‑controlled.
Martin: Why?
Phelps: Well, let’s go back. To understand today we have to go back to the Napoleonic Wars.
When Napoleon came to power, he was brought to power in Corsica. When the Jesuits were
suppressed, one of their main outposts during their suppression was the Isle of Corsica. The Jesuits,
remember, had finished the High Rites of Freemasonry with Frederick the Great, and then used their
French Freemason Napoleon to execute their vengeance.
However, the Jesuits were also protected during their suppression in England. A very wealthy
landowner—and you can find this in Ridpath’s History Of The World—gave his wonderful,
beautiful estate Stonyhurst to the Jesuit Order. And from then on, the Jesuits received protection by
King George III, and you will find that in Mitchell’s The Jesuits. Mitchell is an English historian.
Ok, so the Jesuits are now protected by King George III. Well, they’re going to uphold his throne.
The Jesuits use the English army and navy in the resistance of Napoleon, as both sides are
controlled, so that the Jesuits can control the outcome.
The end result is that, after Napoleon accomplishes everything that the Jesuits want him to do—the
expulsion of the Knights of Malta, the driving of the Roman Catholics from their throne, imprisoning
the Pope for 5 years, etc.—Napoleon is then ordered to abandon his army in the snows of Russia,
killing all of those French and German patriots, so that there are very few patriots left in Europe to
resist the tyranny coming in France with Louis XVIII, who the Jesuits will put back on the throne.
Louis XVIII was in exile, in England, in King George’s own parlor, waiting for the end of the
Napoleonic Wars. So, the Jesuits put Louis XVIII back on the throne. He readmitted the Jesuits,
started the Inquisition, just like they did with Ferdinand VII when they restored him to power in
Spain after the Napoleonic Wars.
And where do these monarchs get their protection? From King George III. King George was used
by the Jesuits to restore their power in Europe, after the Napoleonic Wars, after they punished the
Pope and the monarchs.
So, it’s been, really, from 1795, right around there, that the Jesuits have controlled England. They’ve
controlled the Knights, they’ve controlled the King. All throughout the 18th century, now, England
will never go to war with France again. England will side with the French during the Crimean War.
England will be on the side of the French during World Wars I & II. England and France are
together, both controlled by the Jesuits—even though France is predominantly a Catholic country,
and when England was, at least on it’s face, a Protestant country. Why should both be working
together, both having the same foreign policy. Why? Because the Jesuits control both countries.
When Rothschild sent that note, via Roost, into London, saying that Napolean had won the Battle of
Waterloo, that’s when the stocks plummeted, and all the Jesuits bought all the stocks up, there in
London, and got control of the Bank of England. The Jesuits then made London their commercial
center of the world, and Rome their religious center, aiming that one day Jerusalem would be both.
So now the Jesuits are in control of England. After the Napoleonic Wars, we have the Congress of
Vienna in 1815, and guess who’s there? All the representatives of King George. England is
represented at the Congress of Vienna, the settlement after the Napoleonic Wars. If England was
truly Protestant, they would have never went there. Now the Jesuits are in control of England
throughout the 1800s, and they use the British Empire to further the power of the Pope. England has
been under Rome’s control, the Pope’s control, since, at the very latest, 1850. And I say since
1795.
Martin: Let’s talk about Elizabeth II.
Phelps: Elizabeth II is a wicked, evil queen. She is the head of the Knights of Malta in England. She
curtsies to the Lord Mayor in Old London, and she goes and visits the Jesuits of Stonyhurst and
kisses their derrières. She has complete allegiance to the Jesuits of Stonyhurst, and will do anything
they tell her to do, or they’ll get rid of her just like they got rid of all the rest of the monarchs in
Europe.
Martin: So you see her as a pawn.
Phelps: She’s just a pawn, sure. She’s nothing. Remember, White men rule the world. Evil, White,
sodomite, homosexual men rule the world, and these are the High Jesuits, with their High Knights of
Malta and High Freemasons, they rule. And these women who are involved are just pawns in their
game, like the queen, the queen of Holland, just to give the appearance that these nations have a
sovereign monarch, when in fact, they’re just tools.
England has done some awful, terrible things, but all of the things that they have done increase and
benefit the Jesuit Order. They never resisted Napoleon III. Napoleon III was a fanatical Roman
Catholic Freemason, subject to the Jesuits, who was the King of France for 18 years, second
Empire. England never resisted him. They fought with him in the Crimean War. And Napoleon III
dedicated all of his ships to the Virgin Mary. England has been on the side of the Jesuits since 1815,
no later. So, that means that the British Secret Service is totally working for Rome, all throughout the
1800s.
Martin: How did the Jesuits regain control of the Vatican in 1814?
Phelps: Remember that they were in control of Napoleon. A Jesuit by the name of Abbie
Sieyes—you can find him, again, in Ridpath’s History Of The World—Abbie Sieyes was a
Jesuit‑trained individual, and I believe he was a Jesuit. He was on the Directory, and he was also on
the Consulate; he was the second counsel. Napoleon was the first; he was the second. He was the
advisor and director of Napoleon. Abbie Sieyes, being the Jesuit that he was, ordered Napoleon to
imprison the Pope for 5 years, and he did! So, the Pope was in prison for 5 years until 1814, when
he restored the Jesuit Order. The Pope, prior to that, was killed. They brought him over the
mountains of the Alps, and he died through that debacle.
The Jesuits thoroughly humiliated the papacy. They used their French soldiers to overturn St. Peter’s
chair, and they found, written in Arabic: "There is no other God but Allah, and Mohammed is his
prophet." And THAT is what is under St. Peter’s chair today. That was stolen from some kalif
during the Crusades.
So, they completely intimidated the Pope and showed their power. The Pope then restored them
with a Papal Bull, calling upon the vengeance of the Apostles Peter and Paul, blah, blah, blah, for
anyone who would ever suppress the Jesuit Order ever again. When the Jesuits were "reinstalled" in
all their power, that’s when they were in control of the Pope, and from then on they have been.
Any Pope who resists them gets punished or murdered. And all the Popes know it. When Pius IX
wanted a liberal constitution for the Italian people in 1849, all of the Italians were delighted. Here is a
liberal Pope; he’s going to give us constitutional rights; we’re going to have a constitution.
The Jesuits raised up a revolution with Garibaldi and their Freemasons, and drove Pius IX from his
throne. He had to stay in Gaeta for about a year. When he returned to Rome, under the protection
of Napoleon III’s French army—actually, it was the republic’s army that would later be his "army of
the empire"—but they returned with a French army, protecting the Pope, he became the most
fanatical absolutist, pursuant to the wishes of the Jesuits.
So, Piux IX was punished. But the Popes who don’t obey, like, what was it, In God’s Name, the
Pope who was murdered after 33 days, when he didn’t go along with the Jesuit Order, they ended
his life.
[Editor’s note: Eric is here referring to the very well researched and deeply insightful 1984
Bantam Books gem (that’s very hard to find, for "some" reason!) by David A. Yallop, called In
God’s Name, which details the author’s thorough investigation into the murder of Pope John
Paul I the night of September 28‑29, 1978 after John Paul had been digging into the massive
web of corruption surrounding the Vatican Bank. For all of you who look for clues, note well
the choosing of day 33 since his election for the execution of the murder.]
When you steal from the Vatican, like the Cardinal did at the PII Lodge, they killed him (Kalvi), and
they hanged the other guy, beginning with the admiralty jurisdiction, at their first bridge of the sea. So
they have their assassins everywhere to carry out orders. They are machines. They are the perfect
"Manchurian Candidates" and they will kill popes, cardinals, presidents, kings, and kaisers, to
maintain Jesuit power. They are utterly ruthless—just like they said they would be in the Protocols:
"We are merciless."
Martin: As you look around the world today, who do you see opposing them?
Phelps: It’s interesting. I have a friend who makes quite a few trips to Haiti. I told her about the
Jesuits. She got to questioning a few people, and she found that Papa Doc had expelled the Jesuits
from Haiti.
Martin: No kidding?
Phelps: That’s right. Isn’t it interesting, his son was also driven from power and the guy put in his
place, I believe it was Aristide, is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and a complete
pawn of the Pope and the Jesuit Order—for which reason, when those Haitians wanted to drive
Aristide from his power, this filthy, Jesuit‑controlled government in Washington put an embargo
against Haiti, wrecking the country. See how the U.S. government uses its military, political, and
financial power to maintain the temporal power of the Pope? And that’s not only in Haiti; it’s
everywhere. Russia is another example.
Martin: Don’t you see, coming up soon in Israel, some of these powers coming head‑to‑head over
the rebuilding of Solomon’s Temple? Don’t you see some conflicts with the powers that be?