Chapter Five

                                                                     Is It Time For Judgment

Judgment has already begun at the house of God.

"For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?"

The day of judgment is upon every Israelite Nation of the Western World, all of which now are suffering tremendous political, economic, moral, social, and religious problems. The clouds are gathering over the Western World, and America, in particular, is coming under increasing judgment as the hand of a righteous and sovereign God reaches to shake the Covenant Israelites. This judgment is intended to bring correction and repentance, not destruction. The promise of the Holy Scriptures [1] is that our own wickedness will correct Israel. The promise of Isaiah 26:9 is that when the judgments of God are in the earth, His people will learn righteousness.

We are now in the time of Jacob's trouble and this Divine chastisement will grow increasingly more intense as we move deeper into this period of national judgment a period which in the Divine master plan of God will bring all these nations to their Prophetic Fullness . Jeremiah 30:11 and 46:28 confirm that all of the nations of Israel will come to their full end during the time of Jacob's trouble. Jeremiah 30:11 assures us that the people will survive and endure, but the nations will not.

The Israelite nations are now in another captivity which will exceed both the Assyrian and Babylonian captivity. Future writers will describe Israel in America as the American captivity. We are in the day of judgment; the time of Jacob's Trouble is upon us, and the Israelite remnant with contrite hearts must seek the face of God and turn in obedience to His Covenant.

                                      God Is Speaking To America, But America Is Not Listening

God is speaking to America, the great nation of the Birthright promised to Joseph. But our nation is not listening. In January of 1986, the American spaceship Challenger exploded seconds after takeoff, and several subsequent space shots have failed. The multi‑racial crew aboard the Challenger was an attempt to glorify America as a fully integrated society, and God, who controls events in heaven and earth, recorded His displeasure by allowing the spaceship to be blown to pieces and sending all the crew members to a fiery death. The heavens still rule!

The West Coast area of America has been baking, quaking, and burning since the summer and fall of 1987. Earthquakes, floods, droughts, and violent weather patterns have increased in both frequency and intensity in America in recent years. But still America does not listen.

Leading candidates for the American Presidency have been brought to ruin by immoral acts which they personally committed and sanctioned. Giant television ministries have been brought to ruin as a righteous God is exposing the immorality and corruption of their leaders.

In September, the religious leader of the Roman Catholic Church incurred the wrath of God when he visited the United States. A bolt of lightning brought an end to the spectacular million dollar mass being celebrated by almost a million people in Miami, Florida.

The mass was placed in darkness and the voice of the Pope was silenced by this bolt of lighting and the subsequent storm. The preparations underway in San Antonio, Texas for celebration of the Roman Catholic Mass were struck a devastating blow when a fierce thunder storm toppled the altar and other preparations for an outdoor mass. Both the Protestant and Catholic factions of the church world have received warnings from the God of Heaven. God is speaking to America, but America is not listening.

The United States of America was birthed in a Covenant relationship with Jesus Christ. The birth of America in 1776 marked the beginning of the separate destiny of Israel in the birthright promise made to Jacob [2] ; as the singularly great nation, Manasseh would become a great people [3] . America represents the greatest nation making up the great land assigned to Joseph in Deuteronomy 33:13.

The American land of Manasseh represents the fulfillment, together with the nations of the British Empire in the role of Ephraim, of the promises made to Joseph. America is a covenant land, the land of Regathered Israel! When the Israelite people known as the Pilgrims and Puritans came to America along with other Israel settlers, they were planting the Birthright promise made to Joseph in the soil of this land. Most of the early colonial populations came from the birthright population of Joseph/Israel, then located in the British Isles.

From the beginning America was a nation under covenant status. Our political, economic, social, and religious institutions were stablished upon the foundations of the Bible. The character of the people was absolutely Christian, and Christian morality was the standard for this nation. The people of this land were in covenant relationship with Jesus Christ, and the trade, commerce, productivity and growth of this land prospered under the blessings of Almighty God.

From 1607 through the early years of the 19th century America was in right covenant relationship with Jesus Christ. Beginning at a point around 1850, this nation gradually turned from the Covenant Law of Jesus Christ and the Bible. Christian morality began to suffer and decline.

With the advent of the 20th century in 1900, both the character of the people and the institutions of this land became more and more secular and humanistic. America's entry into the first world war in 1917 marked the beginning of our present seventy year captivity and subsequent plunge into political, economic, moral, social, and religious darkness. The political, economic, industrial, and military apex of America was reached at the end of the Second World War in 1945. At that point, American political and military power dominated the world and dictated the geographical perimeters of the earth.

American industrial output exceeded that of the rest of the world. American agriculture out‑produced the rest of the world. American agriculture outproduced the rest of the nations on earth. The economic fortunes of America were the most coveted on earth, and the standard of living exceeded by far the best of all other nations on this planet.

Beginning at a time in 1914 with the advent of the First World War in Europe, followed by the Bolshevik Revolution in Christian Russia in 1917, a series of events brought about the political, military, social, economic, industrial, and religious transformation of this nation: American recognition of the Soviet Union in 1933, our entry into World War II in 1941 and the subsequent sellout of American politicians to the Soviet Union at the close of the Second World War, the loss of Eastern Europe to the Soviets, the fall of China in 1949, the Korean Police Action, 1950‑1953, the American military and industrial buildup of the Soviet Union from 1933 through to 1960, followed by the Vietnam War, 1961‑1973. The birthright nation of America in 1987 is an empty shell of its former glory and grandeur.

America is now into the seventieth year of captivity, beginning at the point of our entry into World War I in 1917. From that date forward America has been on steady and gradual political, economic, industrial, military, social, and spiritual decline. The glory cloud has lifted from this land. The Covenant blessings of Jesus Christ no longer shine upon us. The bountiful outpourings of Divine favor no longer bless this country. The sterling character and Bible‑centered mindset are not longer a part of the American vision. The American dreams of righteousness, peace, and prosperity have turned into a long nightmare of political instability, economic downturns, industrial collapse, military retreat, social chaos, and spiritual decline and death. The glory cloud has lifted from our land, and the clouds of Divine Judgment gather over our national heads, and has increased dramatically since our recognition of the Easu‑Canaanite‑Khazar Jew in Palestine with ever increasing fury and intensity.

The punishment of a righteous and jealous God is now upon America. The curses are upon our land and the judgment causeless has not come. We have become a proud, stiffnecked, and disobedient people and have turned from God and the righteous Laws of His Divine Covenant. We have worshipped other gods, we have discarded His Law, and we have followed vain idols, sought for vain riches, and polluted His Holy Word. We have broken Covenant with the God of our fathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel. We live in sin, and every imagination of man's heart is bent upon a betrayal of the Covenant which God established with our Christian fathers in the early history of America.

The curses now poured upon our land are only the preliminary round of Divine Judgment as the promises of Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28 visit our people. These curses are intended to turn us in repentance to God, who commands obedience to His Law. The judgments upon us are legion, and no pen can describe them all. We are presently under an alien invasion, and the millions of non‑white, non‑Israelite people pouring into this country from Asia, Africa, India, Mexico, and the far corners of the non‑white third world stagger the mind.

In fulfillment of Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28, our White Native Birthright population of Israelite people is being swallowed up in a sea of third world aliens. Soon, we native Americans will be living in our enemies land as foreign, alien swarms buy up our country.

The curse of heathen gods, heathen temples, and alien religions are rampant in America. Witchcraft, the occult, and the religions of demons and darkness are captivating the minds of our people. The curses of diseases and plagues cover our land. Millions are dying from the degenerative diseases promised in Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28. One out of four Americans will contract cancer of some kind. The plague of Aids [Acquired Immoral Deadly Sin] threatens the very existence of the American people. Up to two million people may already be infected, and millions may die within five years.

Economically, our fortunes are tumbling into oblivion. America is the largest debtor nation in the world. We have lost our economic footing and are plunging into the depths of debt, recession, depression, inflation, and ultimately, total economic collapse! The standard of living in America is plunging, and millions face poverty.

The rust belt from the great lakes all the way through the industrial north‑Eastern United States bears testimony to the closed factories, the empty shipping yards, and the millions of unemployed people now dependent upon welfare doles. Timber, mining, and ranching in the Pacific Northwest are in decline, as is the textile industry of the Southeast.

The Agricultural farm belt in the Midwest is now in its seventh year of economic stagnation. The homeless, helpless, unemployed, and mistrained people are growing by the millions in mainstream America. We are under the curses of Leviticus and Deuteronomy. And yet our elected leaders tell us it is good when not everyone is working! And America believes this abominable lie.

The morality of the American people is sinking into the spiritual abyss. Sodomites [Queers] stalk our land by the millions, seeking the prey of our children. Sexual promiscuity is a way of life for the unmarried, and adultery is the standard for the married of our land. Miscegenation is a growing fad as tens of thousands of white girls become the proud wives of non‑white males and millions of mongrel children are born across the hinterland of America. We openly sanction the murder of the unborn in infanticide murder mills throughout our nation: murder is now legalized in America as abortion clinics put innocent unborn babies to death every hour. Crimes of violence, rape, murder, kidnapping, and sodomy are skyrocketing in our land. We have become an immoral people, and our thirst for sin is taking us to the bottomless pit of every vile perversion known to mankind.

Our civil servants [politicians] are scrambling night and day to destroy our country, while all the while pretending to be trying to hold it together. Our political future is so unsettled that no one seems to know what to do. In a nation of 240 million people, we cannot find any men of character and moral strength to run for public office.

We seek more and more to increase taxation to the working population to fund the ever increasing needs of the millions who are now dependent upon public welfare doles, and to support the anti‑Christ countries such as Russia and Israel. The red tape of government grows ever more as small business is strangled and chocked by regulations, paperwork, and higher and higher taxes. People are lined up for minimum wage jobs, and tens of thousands of college graduates are begging for jobs in this land.

Those people who are numbered in the remnant must enter into a time of repentance and remember rebellion is not the answer. The judgments upon our land have come because of our national disobedience to the Covenant Law of God. No amount of rebellion and resistance to civil authority is going to remove this "Yoke of Bondage" from our necks. We are under the punishment inflicted by a just and Holy God. We can resist this judgment in whatever form it may be coming upon us, but God will not bless our efforts, unless and until we turn completely to Him and the Lord Jesus Christ. We will continue to meet with increased suffering.

The time has come for the remnant to lead the way to national repentance in this land. God wants repentance, from His people. Because we have not repented, twenty years of tax rebellion in America produced the most sweeping income tax reform law in the history of this nation. Only Repentance will bring favor from God and reprieve from our bondage.

Like the Prodigal Son in Luke 15:18‑19, we must be willing to acknowledge our national sin and declare it to God. National repentance is the message for our Covenant People, and no other message will bring our people deliverance. Repentance will return us to God and bring about the restitution of His Law.

Christians are called to war against Satan, and the evil in this world. We are not to roll over and play dead with sin. We are to protest and fight sin at every opportunity. We are to Hate Evil and Love the Good. We are to expose sin and lift up our voice on high against it with all our might and strength. We need to put the protest back into the word Protestant and stand up for the truth and cause of Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ Himself told us in no uncertain terms, When we see the Enemy Coming to :

"He that hath no Sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one." [4]

Christians have a duty to not only witness against sin and to witness for Jesus Christ, but to Fight when necessary with all the strength and courage that God's People have always had, when God was on their side. The Holy Bible becomes the standard by which we are to war against Satan, sin and the world. We are not to love the world, but we are to wage warfare against evil. True Christian America is at war with Satan, with all that is anti‑Christian in this world, and with sin; wherever and whenever it appears.

     Pacifism Is A Religion of Cowards ! The Church must defend the faith, and uphold the Lord Jesus Christ, and that which belongs to God. When Caesar [government] invades God's jurisdiction, The People Who Are Called by His Name Must Draw Lines and Take up The Sword and Take a Stand: Even to the Giving up of one's Life!

Jesus said:

"...he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it." [5]

                                    There Can and Must be no Compromises and No Pacifism In

                              The Defense of The Faith and The Lord Jesus Christ, And His Laws

The Israelite remnant must stand in defense of the faith of Jesus Christ. Heresies blow in with every wind that stirs across our land. Thousands of people live by a mail box theology. Multitudes of Christians forge their doctrines from the latest delivery of mail.

Christians must remember that the faith and doctrines of True Christianity was forged on the anvil of intense faith, study, persecution, and tribulation by the first Apostles, the Apostolic Fathers, and the students of the Word in the first dawning of the Christian era. Beware of the multitude of doctrinal heresies which have invaded the churches of organized religion. As Israelites called to be Christians, we must walk in the faith of our Christian fathers; that faith is articulated in the early creeds of the Christian faith. Do not allow your children to be raised in doctrinal error, or they will not remain in the faith.

The single greatest priority of our lives should be to witness to the truth of the Lord Jesus Christ and the Gospel of His Kingdom to come here on Earth not in some far away heaven. As the Exodus from the Organized Church world continues and even well‑known television ministries fold, vast numbers of Israelites in America will be seeking the truth. [The failing of the TV ministries will be used by the anti‑Christs in Government to destroy the faithful and true churches of the Lord Jesus Christ if at all possible]. Jesus said of the days to come in the very near future:

"For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places...Then shall they deliver You [Christians] up to be afflicted [placed in jail, beaten and etc.], and Shall Kill You [Christians]: and ye [Christians] shall be hated of all nations [due to the propaganda of the anti‑Christs who own all the news media sources ‑ The Jews] for My [the Lord Jesus Christ] Name's [CHRISTian] Sake . And then shall many be Offended [the most outspoken enemies other than the anti‑Christs of today are the so‑called Christians who rail against those who would teach the Truth to our Israel people and are the ones who deny that truth the most], and shall Betray one another, and shall Hate one another. And many False Prophets shall Rise , and Shall Deceive Many . And Because Iniquity shall abound, the Love of many shall Wax Cold [these days are here now and things will get much worse because of our national unbelief and sins]." [6]

The political social and economic storm clouds now gathering over our national heads will bring us to a time of increasing trouble and tribulation. There will be a persecution against the True Christians . The Anti‑Christ forces are even now marshalling their tremendous power against all who stand for Christ in these, the last days. We live in the very close of the Western Christian Culture Cycle, and we dare not forget that the precarious times in which we live demand that we go forth with a vision and with the Banner of the Lord Jesus Christ held high.

With a national population of some 240 million people, and with more than one half of this number non‑white and another high percentage of mixed mongrel blood, the pure White Stock of America is a decided minority. The presence of such a large non‑White population, together with a national policy of forced integration of the races, leaves the Israelite [and We Do Not Mean The Jews: We Mean The True Israelites The White Anglo-Saxons ] remnant in America with limited options.

Our best hope is to quietly: Arm ourselves with all types of weapons for defense, learn to become self‑sufficient, grow our own food, educate our own children, and live in obedience to Gods Commandments under the protection of Almighty God and under the Shed Blood of the Lord Jesus Christ.

General Douglas MacArthur stated:

"I am concerned for the security of our great nation, not so much because of a potential threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within which, opposed to all of our great traditions, have gravely weakened the structure and tone of our American way of life." [7]

And again before the Massachusetts Legislature, on July 25, 1951, he enlarged on the same warning with even more emphasis.

"This evil force, with neither spiritual base nor moral standard, rallies the abnormal and subnormal elements [Queers and misfits of society] Among Our Citizenry and Applies Internal Pressure Against All Things We Hold Decent and All Things That We Hold Right : the type of Pressure Which Has Caused Many Christian Nations Abroad to Fall and their own cherished freedoms to languish in the shackles of complete suppression."

As it has happened there, It Can Happen Here . Our need for patriotic fervor and religious devotion has never been more impelling. There can be no compromise with Atheistic Zionist Communist Judaism: No half way in the preservation of freedom and the worship of Almighty God and our Saviour the Lord Jesus Christ. It must be all or nothing.

We must unite in the high purpose that the liberties etched upon the design of our life by our forefathers, and upon our heart by Almighty God, that be unimpaired and that we maintain the moral courage and spiritual leadership to preserve inviolate that bulwark of all freedom, Our Christian Faith .

The prevailing trend today is marked by a disposition to be all things to all men. It is popular to exhibit a magnanimous spirit of compromise where most of the pertinent issues of the day are concerned. What is overlooked, however, is the fact that the word "compromise," as defined in the dictionary, means "to give up" "to surrender."

To surrender one's convictions in order to appease those who would otherwise be offended is sinful, for in so doing the truth is forsaken. It is interesting to note that the words, "compromise" and "surrender" are not found in the Bible, For there is to be no quarter given in the unending war between the forces of good and evil until the victory is won. Thus there must be no letup in the struggle to resist the inroads of wickedness, until the reign of righteousness is ushered in at the end of the age.

When the Christian forgets these fundamental facts, and accepts concessions which discredit Scriptural pronouncements for the sake of a false sense of accord, he is treading on forbidden ground. As long as evangelists Hew to the line in their presentation of the Gospel of Salvation by Grace, there is no basis for criticism. In fact, to their endeavors to convince the unregenerated of the necessity to Pray to Jesus Christ that God will call you to be His; Then Repent; Then God Says He will Forgive our Sins and Restore our Land and People! To That We Say A fervent "God-Speed."

However, when the vital realities of prophecy fulfilled are mishandled, and the doctrines of the Gospel are twisted, As is being done in almost every pulpit in America today by Prophets and Priests of Baal , it become our duty to take issue and to fight against those false statements and expose the unwarranted assumption of Scriptural support for spurious claims being made from pulpits, on radio and on television.

It is ever more imperative to attack the false lying doctrine that the Jews are "The Chosen People" and to just as strongly oppose the negation of the Christians as constituting the true Israel in the world today. The Lord Jesus Christ said the Jews were His enemies and to bring them forth and slay them before Him:

"But those mine enemies [the Jews], which would not that I should reign over them [the Jews said: '...We have no king but Caesar.' [8] thus rejecting the Lord Jesus Christ as their king], bring hither, And Slay Them Before Me. " [9]

Therefore, if the Jews are the enemies of the Lord Jesus Christ: Then they are my enemies and I will, with the help of Almighty God, for without His help I am nothing and would not be able to keep my word; Never Never, be a "Compromise" or "Surrender" Even if I should live a thousand years, or if I should be murdered by the Jews Tomorrow, They will never be other than my enemies: For the Lord Jesus Christ is My Saviour and King!!

There are many facts in this presentation which you, the reader, will not wish to accept. I ask you to accept nothing, make your own investigations. For in doing so you may find even more astonishing true facts than I have managed to glean in years of intensive and in‑depth research and study.

"Agree with me if I seem to you to speak the truth; or, if not, withstand me might and main that I may not deceive you as well as myself in my desire, and like the bee leave my sting in you before I die. And now let us proceed." [10]

It is a fact, proven from both the Scriptures and History, that the race, religion, nationality and culture of Jesus, was not the race, nationality and culture of the "Jews" of the 20th Century. There are very few of the so‑called "Jews," who can trace their bloodlines back to Abraham. And those who can Must trace their ancestry through the mixed blood of the children of Judah, Esau and the Canaanites. The Jewish writer, Alfred Lilienthal, in his book, The Controversy of Zion states:

"I have no doubt some of my Christian readers have as much right to the land of Palestine as Menachem Begin."

                                               Begin's Ancestors Never Lived in The Holy Land

Begin and all other Russian Jews originated from South Russia in the Khazar area. These Khazars converted to Judaism in about the year 800 A.D. and their ancestors never lived in Palestine and are in no way related to the ancient Hebrews of the Holy Bible. The Russian Jews rule over a captured state which rightfully belongs to the Palestinian people. Please bear in mind the fact that the Palestinians are half Christian and half Moslem and the Holy Land holds the most sacred shrines of both these religions. Therefore, if anyone has a Biblical right to Palestine, it is the native Palestinian Arab population which has resided there almost since the beginning of time itself. Many of these people are descended from the original Christian Crusaders and that is why so many of them are blonde, red‑headed and blue‑eyed. Most are Christians! The Jews would have us believe that Palestinians are desert nomads without any civilized roots. The opposite is the truth. The Palestinians built a beautiful agricultural country with an advanced society which has now been seized from them by alien Jew usurpers from Russia and Poland.

Americans are not told that at the time of World War I, 93% of the population of Palestine was Arab and that 98% of the land was owned by Arabs. Nor are they told that just before the Jews created the State known to the world as Israel more than 93% of the land was still owned by Arabs. How then, you should ask, did the Jews obtain Palestine? It was by a military conquest as ruthless as any of Hitler's conquests and the soldier behind it was trained at West Point! Where did the Jews get this army? The British, who ruled Palestine in violation of the treaty of independence which they had made earlier with the Arabs, trained in Palestine an army of Jews for use in World War II. In contrast the British denied the Arabs any military training.

At the close of World War I, America was the only major western nation that the Arab world trusted. Today the Arabs hate the American Government even more than they hate Great Britain under whose politics the state of Israel was created. The Arabs do not like atheistic Russia; but when America collaborates with the godless government of Israel they feel compelled to turn to Russia for the very existence of their governments.

The 1916 agreement between the World Zionist Organization and the British War Cabinet explained to Germans the reason for sudden and unexpected 1916 Zionist stab in German's back. The Germans learned the Zionists did not care who won the war as long as Zionists acquired sovereignty over Palestine. The Germans learned the reason Zionists suddenly deserted Germany and rushed in time of war to ally themselves with Germany's enemy to work for their defeat.

The Germans learned also the reason for Great Britain's post‑war obligation to the Zionists. The Germans learned why after the war ended in 1920, Great Britain stationed 200,000 British troops in Palestine as a shield behind which Great Britain in the next twenty‑eight years illegally transplanted 600,000 Jewish/Zionist paupers into Palestine from Eastern European countries. The Jews justified their usurpation of Palestine by describing that invasion as "the repatriation of God's Chosen People to their ancient homeland, their Promised Land."

Great Britain's post‑war obligation to the Jews under the 1916 agreement required Great Britain to create a Jewish majority in Palestine before holding an election to create the Government of Palestine. Great Britain was appointed temporary administrator of Palestine by the League of Nations in 1920 for the express purpose of holding that election as soon as possible. The Palestine population in 1920 would not have become a Jewish/Zionist Government. In 1920 there were 700,000 Christians and Moslems in Palestine and 50,000 so‑called Jews of whom about one‑half were genuine resident Jewish‑Zionists in Palestine.

Great Britain remained in Palestine for twenty‑eight years as "temporary administrator" without holding that election. In those twenty‑eight years the Christian and Moslem population increased to 1,350,000 and the so‑called Jews increased to 650,000 including the 600,000 transplanted into Palestine by Great Britain. Great Britain had failed to create a Jewish‑Zionist majority. So they withdrew from Palestine in 1948 after turning over her responsibilities to the United Nation.

On the day the last British soldiers left Palestine, May 14, 1948, the 600,000 transplanted Jews armed with $300‑million in the world's most modern weapons drove the 1,350,000 unarmed and defenseless indigenous population into exile. These facts disprove the Jewish‑Zionist lie that usurpation of Palestine can historically be "the repatriation of God's Chosen People to their ancient homeland, their Promised Land."

In 1915 Great Britain pledged Arabs liberation after the war from Turkish sovereignty if Arabs assisted Great Britain in the defense of the Suez Canal against advancing enemy forces. Great Britain gave the Arabs that pledge in writing in advance to show Great Britain's good faith. The loss of the Suez Canal by Great Britain in 1915 meant the loss of the war to Germany. The Arabs revolted against the Turkish Empire and fought with Great Britain's Middle East armed forces. The Arabs thus saved the Suez Canal in 1915.

The Jews knew about Great Britain's 1915 pledge to the Arabs when the Zionists made their 1916 proposal to the British War Cabinet. England knew before concluding the 1916 agreement with the Zionists they could not fulfill both the 1915 Arab pledge and the 1916 Zionist pledge. England was not troubled about double‑crossing the Arabs to win their war against Germany. England was at the mercy of Zionists who dictated their own terms as the price they must pay the Jews for dragging the United States into World War I to prevent Great Britain's defeat.

Among all 600,000 Zionists transplanted into Palestine between 1920 and 1948 by England from Eastern Europe there was not one who had an ancestor who ever set a foot in Palestine in Bible History. These Jewish‑Zionists were descendants of the Asian Mongoloid tribal nation of Turco‑Finn ethnic origin known in Asia as Khazars.

American Christians at the grass‑roots level were told another lie to justify Zionist usurpation of Palestine. They were told the Jews acquired Palestine by virtue of the so‑called Balfour Declaration. They were told the Balfour Declaration "gave" Palestine to the Jews.

They were told Palestine was England's gift to the Jews in gratitude for Chaim Weismann's "discovery" which enable England to win the war against Germany. Chaim Weizmann was a chemist born in Russia who emigrated to England in 1908. He was a Zionist "pioneer" who became the first "president" of the Jewish‑Zionist, so‑called "State of Israel."

The Jews concocted the lie that Chaim Weizmann "discovered" a "miracle" for the manufacture of Acetone. Acetone is an ingredient in the manufacture of high‑explosives. The manufacture of acetone in England had been discontinued long before the outbreak of World War I. Acetone was imported from Germany for a fraction of what it cost to manufacture it in England. German acetone for a great many years enjoyed a monopoly of the existing acetone market in Great Britain.

The outbreak of World War I suddenly created a demand for enormous quantities of acetone. German acetone was no longer imported. And a crash program for it's manufacture was organized. Discontinued facilities were put back into operation again. Chaim Weizmann was employed in that crash program. Acetone for the manufacture of high‑explosives was no longer a problem. Chaim Weizmann performed no "miracle" for which England awarded Palestine to the Jews as compensation for Chaim Weizmann's "miracle."

Neither did Chaim Weizmann nor did acetone have anything to do with the Balfour Declaration. The Balfour Declaration was the meaningless misleading letter of a few sentences jointly prepared by the Jews in Washington with Jews in London. American Christians at the grass‑roots level were never told the purpose of the double‑talk in that cryptic letter. The sixth draft of the letter was rushed to Prime Minister Lloyd George in London with instructions to copy that draft on the official stationery of England's Foreign Office to which their Foreign Minister Arthur Balfour should affix his signature. The draft was addressed by the Jewish‑Zionists to Lord Rothschild, one of its authors and the architect of all Zionist long‑range plans.

Unless England complied with the Zionists demand for that letter the Jews threatened to tell the world the whole story of the 1916 agreement. England submitted to that threat rather than have the world told the facts about the 1916 agreement. England feared world reaction if the Jews told the world how Great Britain was pressured into promising Palestine to the Zionists as compensation for railroading the United States into World War I as England's ally. The 1916 agreement was still a well‑kept secret from the world at large.

Zionists required something justifying England's opening the doors of Palestine wide after the war to unlimited Zionist illegal immigration. Without that letter the Jews would have had no alternative except to expose the 1916 agreement as justification for Zionist usurpation of Palestine. To avoid that possibility England gave the Zionists the Balfour Declaration. The Jewish‑ Zionists were then able to tell the world the Balfour Declaration justified Zionist usurpation of Palestine. Their 1916 agreement could thus remain their secret.

In the text of the Balfour Declaration the Zionists made a reference to an alleged "historic" connection of Zionist Jews with Palestine. The Zionists and England knew the Jews had no "historic" connection with Palestine. The Jews inserted that alleged "historic" connection with Palestine to create the belief that Palestine was the "homeland" of the Jews once upon a time. The Balfour Declaration was intended to draw a "red herring" across the trail of the criminal conspiracy to rob Christians and Moslems of their homeland.

As to the Balfour Declaration, "The Anglo‑Saxon World," in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, said in February 1966: Quote: On Nov. 2, 1917, Arthur James Balfour, then British Foreign Secretary, conveyed the following statement in a letter to Lord Rothschild:

"His Majesty's Government views with favor the establishment in Palestine of a natural home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non‑Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."

The British Government issued "the White Paper" in May of 1939, in which they said,

"The Framers of the Mandate in which the Balfour Declaration was embodied could not have intended that Palestine be converted into a Jewish State against the will of the Arab population of the country."

A joint Anglo‑American committee was set up {Great Britain and the United States} and this committee issued the following statement in 1945:

"We regard it as essential...that Jew shall not dominate Arab and Arab shall not dominate Jew in Palestine; that Palestine shall be neither a Jewish state nor an Arab state...Palestine must ultimately become a state which guards the rights and interests of Moslem, Jew and Christians alike...We therefore, emphatically declare that Palestine is a Holy Land, sacred to Christians, to Jew and to Moslem alike; and because it is a Holy Land, Palestine is not, and never can become, a land which any race or religion can justly claim as its own...the fact that it is the Holy Land, sets Palestine completely apart from other lands, and dedicates it to the precepts and practices of the brotherhood of man, not those of narrow nationalism."

So what happened? The Zionist state was illegally set up in 1948, the Arabs persecuted and "Brotherhood" preached far and wide by the same nationalistic Zionists.

                                                                           The Rothschild's

The Baron Rothschild banking system of Europe previous to World War I, had negotiated a loan of one‑billion dollars to the Turkish Nation and had taken a mortgage on Palestine to assure its payment. Hence when the Armies of General Allenby, fighting with the Allied Nations, captured the city of Jerusalem and the entire Holy Land, they found it to be mortgaged property. The Jewish banking firm of Europe demanded a settlement of their billion dollar loan to Turkey. In order to bring about the settlement of this enormous debt, together with a large amount of accumulated interest, certain liberal deductions were made on the part of the Rothschild Bankers, with the understanding that Palestine was to be given to the Jews for their national homeland. This was the reason for the famous Balfour Declaration, and the action of the 53 nations in the year of 1922, giving the land officially to the Jews.

                                                                  A Further Historical Look

Palestine, which has been an Arab country since the True Israelies were taken away captive by the Assyrains, has been the target of invasion and attempts aiming at de‑Arabising it. The idea of creating a Jewish homeland in Palestine was first advanced in the first Zionist Congress chaired by Theodore Herzel in Basle, Switzerland in August 1897. The most significant step on the road to achieving it was the "Balfour Declaration."

On November 2, 1917, Arthur James Balfour, British Foreign Minister, addressed the following written communication to Lord Rothschild:

"I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to and approved by the Cabinet. His Majesty's Government views with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this objective, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non‑Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country. I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation."

This communication, Saeed Hammami, remarked: "one people solemnly promised to a second the country of a third," has created one of the most explosive problems of our times; a problem which has convulsed the Middle East for more than 70 years, and which even today has not ceased to shake the region to its very foundations. This Declaration is at the root of the Palestine tragedy and of the Arab‑Israeli conflict.

Rev. Denis Fahey, in his The Mystical Body of Christ in the Modern World, p. 292, in reference to a British White Paper and the Balfour Declaration relates:

     "In the April issue of the Loyalty League I dealt with the attempt made, in the course of a series of lectures by a Mr. M. Farbman, at the London School of Economics, to transfer the responsibility for the hideous Russian revolution of 1917 from the real perpetrators, the Jews, and to ascribe it to a purely agrarian movement among the peasants. I undertook in that article to marshal the voluminous and conclusive evidence that this revolution was entirely Jewish in organization and operation, to show that it had nothing to do with an agrarian movement, or indeed with any cause that had Russian interests in view.

     Perhaps one of the most damning pieces of evidence, not only that this revolution, but also the world‑revolution which is planned, is Jewish, lies in the strenuous and partially successful efforts which organized Jewry has made to suppress the truth about it. Not only has Jewry succeeded in large measure in suppressing the truth, but it has seemingly been able to intimidate or cajole the British Foreign Office to suppress a very vital part of one of its own official publications.

     In April, 1919, there was published by the command of His Majesty, and by His Majesty's Stationery Office, a White Paper entitled, Russia, No. 1 (1919). A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia. The Foreword, on p. 6, is as follows: 'The following collection of Reports from His Majesty's official representatives in Russia, from other British subjects who have recently returned from that country, and from independent witnesses of various nationalities, covers the period of the Bolshevik regime from the Summer of 1918 to the present date. They are issued in accordance with a decision of the War Cabinet in January last. They are unaccompanied by anything in the nature either of comment or introduction, since they speak for themselves in the picture which they present of the principles and methods of Bolshevik rule, the appalling incidents by which it has been accompanied, the economic consequences which have flowed from it, and the almost incalculable misery which it has produced.'

     The position, then, is this: This document as it then stood was published by the specific decision of the British War Cabinet. It was such an appalling document, that it needed neither comment, explanation nor extension. The information in it came from His Majesty's official representatives in Russia and from independent persons who had returned from that country with first‑hand knowledge of conditions. The testimony from all these sources of information is the same. Apart from the appalling and fiendish cruelties, the one vital fact which this White Paper reveals is given on page 6, in a report issued by the Netherlands Minister at Petrograd, September 6th, 1918. The Minister was then acting officially for the protection of British subjects and interests, our own official representative, Captain Cromie, having been murdered by the Bolsheviks. The part of the report, in which the one vital and central fact is found, reads as follows:

     'The foregoing report will indicate the extremely critical nature of the present situation. The danger is now so great that I feel it my duty to call the attention of the British and all other Governments to the fact that, if an end is not put to Bolshevism in Russia at once, the civilization of the whole world will be threatened. This is not an exaggeration, but a sober matter of fact; and the most unusual action of German and Austrian consuls‑general, before referred to, in joining in protest of neutral legations, appears to indicate that the danger is also being realized in German and Austrian quarters. I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue now before the world, not even excluding the war which is still raging, and unless, as above stated, Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world, As it is Organized and Worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the Existing Order of Things ...I would beg that this report may be telegraphed as soon as possible in cipher in full to the British Office in view of its importance.'

     This very vital and significant report was sent by the Netherlands Minister in Russia, to Sir M. Finlay, British representative at Christiania, and by him telegraphed to Mr. Balfour at the British Foreign Office. There are many questions that could very pertinently be asked concerning this report. But there are two at the moment that press for an answer beyond all others: (1) Why was this very alarming and crucial information not published in the Press? Why the almost universal silence concerning it? Whose influence suppressed it? (2) Why did this official White Paper, published by His Majesty's command at the express decision of the War Cabinet in April, 1919, disappear from circulation and become unobtainable? And why was there published in its place an abridged edition, in which this particular passage and very little else of equal importance from the Netherlands Minister's report was eliminated? So that when innocent and unsuspecting Englishmen applied to His Majesty's Stationery Office (never suspecting guile or deception in their own Foreign Office) for this particular White Paper, they were given the abridged edition, without specific attention being called to the fact.

     A large proportion of those who applied in the ordinary course doubtless accepted what was given them, and little realized the important nature of the truth which had been expunged in the abridged edition. Some, however, wishing for the fullest information, returned the abridged edition and asked for the original. They were told it was out of print...

     Now we come to the crucial question: Why was this abridged edition substituted for the original? Why did the abridgement take the form it did, i.e., eliminate the damning and sinister fact that: 'Bolshevik is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.'

     Why is the original edition unobtainable? It is an official document and therefore public property. Under what constitutional right does the British Foreign Office refuse to supply it?

     It is obviously and logically clear that there is only one race on earth that has any interest in the suppression of this official document, and that race is the Jewish race. No other race nor any civilized Government can be benefited by its suppression, for the report within it says quite specifically: 'The danger is now so great that I feel it my duty to call the attention of the British and all other Governments to the fact that, if an end is not put to Bolshevism in Russia at once, the civilization of the whole world will be threatened.'

     Mr. Norman Bentwich, O.B.E., M.C., was legal secretary, then Attorney‑General, of the Government of Palestine, and had been in the Ministry of Justice, Cairo. He had served as co‑editor of the Jewish Review, is a lecturer on Jewish subjects, and author of historical and legal books. In an American paper, B'nai B'rith Magazine, for March, he had an article, 'Is Judaism Doomed in Soviet Russia?' to which he says 'No'; and from that article the quotations given below are of interest. The 'B'nai B'rith' [Children of the Covenant] is a Jewish secret society, not affiliated to Freemasonry, but having much the same ritual and operative methods:

     'The teaching of the Hebrew Prophets,' to set the oppressed and to break every yoke,' was the underlying motive [a false presentation] of the Bolshevik revolution. It is certain that the principal prophet of the proletarian movement was the German Jew, Karl Marx, whose picture hangs in every public institution and whose book, Kapital, is the gospel of the Communist creed; that another German Jew, Ferdinand Lassalle, whose heroic statue adorns the Nevski Prospect of Leningrad, was one of the inspirers of the early revolutionary parties; that Jews have, from the beginning to the present day, played a part in the creation and the maintenance of the revolution; and that for no community has the revolution brought about a greater change of status than for the Jews. Under the Czars their life was outwardly a long humiliation; but it had its compensations in the inner strength of the community and in the national ideal of which the flame burnt eternally. Today, they have been given complete civic and social equality with the rest of the population; and, indeed, Lenin's saying is constantly quoted, that those peoples which were previously oppressed should be specially favored. On the other hand, their inner strength and cohesion are broken, and the hold of the traditional religion is weakened by every possible pressure and persuasion: while the fostering of the Zionist ideal is punished ruthlessly by the State as a counter‑revolutionary movement.

     'The essential feature about their community which strikes the visitor is that the Jews, and particularly the younger generation, feel at home, and part and parcel of the new order. They are proud of their share in the councils of the revolution: of Trotsky, who organized the Red Army (though among non‑Jews he is in disgrace and his name is not mentioned), and of the Jews who hold high positions in the Foreign Office and other Ministries, in the Army and the Navy, in the economic councils and academies.

      When we landed in Leningrad, our interpreters and guides from the State Tourist Organization were usually Jews and Jewesses. It is the function of the Jew to be the interpreter of Soviet Russia to the world and of the world in Soviet Russia; for he forms the principal element in the proletarian society which has close touch with the Western European culture and languages...The suppression of the Ghetto and of the Orthodox Church has brought this outward freedom; and the Government punishes severely any outward manifestation of anti‑Semitism.

     The industrial enthusiasm of the Soviet State, which finds its expression in the Five Years' Plan, has been an advantage for the Jews, who can acquire a technical capacity quicker than the rest of the people. The policy of collective farming with mechanical machinery and the industrialization of agriculture, which is being carried out with breathless and ruthless vigor, accords also with the Jewish intelligence. For the Jew is often by nature a collectivist.

     The achievement in the way of fostering industrial skill, in the heavy as well as in the lighter industries, among the Jews, has been equally remarkable. Hundreds of thousands are working in the textile factories, the metal works, the electric power stations, the tailor shops, and the manifold industries of the State. Their numbers were reckoned in 1932, at over 1,300,000.

     In the towns such as Kiev, Odessa, Berdichev, where the Jews are a quarter or more of the whole population, there are Yiddish law courts and Yiddish codes of law, and Yiddish is an official language. But the Rabbinical law which used to regulate Jewish family affairs may not be applied, and the Beth‑Din may not function. The academy of higher learning in such centers, which has taken the place of the former university, includes a section for Jewish learning and research...

     The Communist Party, which controls the Soviet Government, is opposed to Judaism as to any other established religion; for its dominant creed is a militant atheism. Yet it has to be recognized that the attack on the old Jewish worship and learning, the demand for the closing of synagogues and schools and yeshivas comes principally from the younger generation of Jews. The Jewish Communist youth in large part have revolted against the older order...The question arises whether Judaism will survive in this hostile atmosphere, without the religious hold and without the national atmosphere, without the religious hold and without the national ideal, reduced to a matter of national or racial pride and feeling...The revulsion of this generation against the old creed and its devotion to a materialistic theory of the work will not be a permanent belief. It is contrary alike to the Russian and the Jewish nature and to the outlook of science in our day.' [11]

     In connection with this extract, it is well to note that Jews who are members of the B'nai B'rith may be Freemasons, but that non‑Jews are not allowed to enter the B'nai B'rith.

     'Using the term Anglo‑Saxons in its broad modern sense of meaning the English‑speaking peoples, it will be generally considered an impossible proposition that those peoples, reputed pre‑eminent in their love of freedom, are subject to a very real censorship over what they are permitted to read. At a time when the utmost license is exercised daily in printed and spoken word against God, King, morals, and country, it will seem to most Anglo‑Saxons an absurd story that they are not permitted to read, or to publish, a certain class of subjects of world‑wide bearing, which are freely published and discussed by non‑English speaking peoples. The seeming absurdity of the statement is due to the fact that the censorship is invisible in application, is never mentioned publicly, and its decrees are discreetly enforced, usually without any specific judgment having to be pronounced. For simplicity in explanation of the broad facts, this article will be confined to the censorship under which publishers of books and newspapers must conduct their part of the education of Anglo‑Saxons on current events and past history. The recognition of the authority of the censorship is based, in most part, on a great commercial power at the disposal of the censors; and in part on the indirect effects of a vast propaganda in the shaping of popular opinion in a sense favorable to the aims of the censors. It is obvious that a deliberate limitation, in any country, of what can be profitably published is a restriction of the freedom in reading for the great mass of people in that country.

     The censorship in force is Jewish in character, in backing, and in its operative machinery. But it is not confined in its supervision and operation to a definitely organized body of men, even if there be such an organization unknown to us. The Jewish race is absolutely apart from all others in its solidarity, which is maintained in spite of complete dispersion over the globe, and in spite of fundamental differences in religion, in politics, and in material and spiritual attachments within many different nations. The dispersion of the individuals, accompanied as it is by close inter‑communications, through business relations in all countries, and by literature on racial interests, permits of the exercise of an over‑growing world power. The guiding of that power cannot be traced to any one central control: but there are many organizations which co‑operate in all matters affecting racial interest. In England there is a very influential 'Board of Deputies of the British Jews'; in America there are the 'New York Kehillah,' and the 'American Jewish Committee,' as powerful directors of Jewish thought and actions; whilst the equivalent of a great Masonic lodge of the Jewish people is found in the 'Independent Order of B'nai B'rith,' which has a very large (America) membership, as well as lodges in many countries. In France there is the nucleus of the building of a single directing center in the 'Alliance Israelite Universelle,' with the ambition of domination over the earth, and working thereto hand in hand with subversive anti‑Christian Grand Orient Freemasonry.

     Other countries have also organizations aiding Jewish solidarity; and that this solidarity does exist can be shown by two illustrations: First, the amazing way in which the whole world was shaken up on several occasions during the long period of the trials for treason of a single French Army officer, Dreyfus; and second, by the persistent policy of concealment, from all peoples, of the leading part played by a section of revolutionary Jews in all the bloodshed and commercial destruction of the Russian people. That concealment is enforced so successfully that neither writers of books nor editors of newspapers can safely forget the interdict. Even a Government White Book issued in April, 1919, and making clear the world‑danger of the Jewish‑Bolshevik conspiracy against civilization was, by some unknown influence, suppressed, and a bowdlerized abridgement was substituted.

     The over‑riding power in literature and publicity of a small Jewish minority in most countries is made up of a variety of elements. There is vast wealth to be drawn on for racial objects; there is ownership or control of large numbers of newspapers; and that control is not merely over the complexion given to some news, but over those reviews of new publications which affect largely their sales. The news agencies feeding the newspapers are mostly under Jewish control. The power exercised in film and theatrical productions is pretty generally known. The enormous potential force of a combination of the wealthy Jewish advertisers in all important papers is fully recognized by journalists, for whom advertisements are the life blood of commercial publication. [The comments of two former editors should suffice to prove the point: 'A considerable portion of the Press is now an ominous danger to public morals, since it has shown itself to be both vile and venal, and willing to deceive and brutalize mankind. The depths to which its employees are frequently reduced is seen in the judgment passed upon the calling of the American journalist, by a New York editor, John Swinton, during an annual dinner of the New York Press Association. It certainly is a frank confession: 'There is no such thing as an independent Press in America, if we except that of little country towns. You know this and I know it. Not a man among you dares to utter his honest opinion. Were you to utter it, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid 150 dollars a weak so that I may keep my honest opinion out of the paper for which I write. You, too, are paid similar salaries for similar services. Were I to permit that a single edition of my newspaper contained an honest opinion, my occupation, like Othello's, would be gone in less than twenty‑four hours. The man who would be so foolish as to write his honest opinion would soon be on the streets in search for another job. It is the duty of a New York journalists To Lie, To Distort, To Revile, To Toady at the feet of Mammon, and to Sell His Country and His Race for his daily bread, or what amounts to the same thing, his salary. We are marionettes. These men pull the strings, and we dance. Our time, our talents, our lives, our capacities are all the property of these men; WE [journalists] Are Intellectual Prostitutes. '

     Philip Francis, for years an editorial writer of great influence in America, and who had had for forty years an intimate connection with journalism, writes: 'With a few honorable exceptions, the big papers and magazines of the United States are the most ignorant and gullible, as well as the most cowardly and controlled Press, printed in any country in the world. The majority of the owners are mere financiers, who look upon their magazines and newspapers simply as money‑making mills, who, whenever it is a question between more coin and good, honest, patriotic, public service, will take the coin every time.' [12]

     What adds to the peril of this capitalized Press, which is, of course, not confined to any country, is the deplorable fact that millions of the people of all lands find in their newspapers their only mental food, and form their opinions on practically all subjects by reading insincerely written editorials. Some even have time only for the headlines!]

     While the political power of Jews might appear negligible because they are equally active in all three Parties here, it is a fact that the division works to great advantage; for, not only is the power exercised out of proportion to numbers in each Party, but it is multiplied by three in matters of racial interest. This is clearly expressed in the words of Emanuel Shinwell, M.P. (Financial Secretary to the War Office), in a speech at the annual dinner of 'B'nai B'rith,' on 23rd June: The Jews in the House of Commons, whatever their political opinions may be, will always stand in that assembly for the rights of the Jewish community. It has been said that they must emphasize the fact of their Judaism before the fact of citizenship. He held that they must regard themselves as Jews and citizens equally.

     In England there is general ignorance of the existence of any important Jewish question. The old idea still prevails that Jews are merely a religious sect; and, in Britain, are mostly rich, and consequently unsympathetic to revolutionary movements. It is a ridiculous misconception of the facts, and it makes the British people particularly easy to guide in matters affecting the Jewish race. There is an important section of Jews who join, and lead, every revolution, as Disraeli made clear in his books; and their predominance in the Bolshevik seizure of power and regime of atrocities should have long ago dissipated the old British illusion. So much sympathy with Bolshevism was shown even in English Jewish papers that ten of the best known British Jews felt forced to write a letter to the Press in April, 1919, repudiating all such sympathy. Large numbers of Jews who first went to Palestine were so little religious, and so much Bolshevik, that orthodox Jews, long settled in the country, objected; and a universally esteemed Rabbi, who was about to visit London to protest, was assassinated. Zionism is an accurate subject of differences between the Jews.

     Some want a national standing of their own centered in Palestine, and also to enjoy full national rights in any country they choose for residence. Others have no desire to weaken their present position of full citizenship in their adopted countries.

     Mr. Ford owned a weekly paper called the Dearborn Independent, and in this a series of articles appeared on the international Jews, and on the Jewish power in America. Those articles were reproduced in four volumes, beginning in November, 1920, and were largely based on Jewish authorities. Three or four lawsuits for large sums were brought against Mr. Ford, and later he received serious injuries in a motor‑car accident, and shortly after that he made a public recantation of all that had appeared in his paper about Jews. Since that date the Jewish power and censorship have found no chronicler in America. When Ambassador Page was editor of the Atlantic Monthly he gave the following advice to a young journalist: 'The most interesting fellow in America is the Jew: but don't write about Jews: without intending it, you may precipitate the calamity America should be most anxious to avoid, I mean Jew‑baiting.' Incidentally we may mention that an English book which happened to contain that quotation was suppressed, soon after birth, by a very obvious withdrawal of the usual advertising nourishment.

     Anglo‑Saxon historians, with the exception of Mrs. Nesta H. Webster, have, to an extraordinary degree, kept off the vital subject of revolutions, on which many learned French writers have produced so much; and, in consequence, English readers are still spoonfed on the picturesque fables of Carlyle and others about the French Revolution, which was typical of all later revolutions in its creation and guidance. In October there will be issued an English translation of the Vicomte de Poncins' book Les Forces Secretes de la Revolution: a compilation from the French school of writers just mentioned, selling well in France, and now appearing in Germany. The 'reaction' of our accepted censorship to the book may give occasion for a supplement to this present article.' [13]

      'In the Patriot of 18th July, 1929, an article under the heading 'Censorship of the Anglo‑Saxons' pointed out how the English‑speaking peoples are today subject to a very real censorship over what they can read, and over what they may publicly state, on a certain range of subjects. That censorship has no legal authority, nor is it a visible organization; but its indisputable power depends on control over the Press and book publishers, exercised either through direct financial interests in the business of newspaper and book‑production, or through indirect influence over producers by the enormous power of bestowal of advertisements and of effectual boycotting. As regards the influence over public speaking, the exercise of power is more subtle and diffused, and is maintained partly by strength in all three of our political parties, partly by varied means of propaganda, including the Press, the films, and broadcasting, which contribute to public ignorance or misdirection on some subjects. In the article it was explained how and why the censorship was in Jewish hands, although large number of Jews are in no way conscious parties to its operation.

     The preponderating part played by Red Jews in the Bolshevik revolution, which dispossessed the Menshevik Government, established on the abdication of the Czar, is beyond doubt, if the facts in the case are put squarely before anyone capable of impartial reasoning. Nevertheless, the censorship, in force for the last twelve years, has been so effective that most British and American people have been kept in ignorance of the essential facts of the past and present situation in Russia, and of the threat involved to civilization and Christianity in most parts of the world. That this Anglo‑Saxon ignorance is due to continuous suppression of the publicity of all undesired views is evident from the fate which has befallen the occasion attempts in newspapers, books, and lectures, to show that the preparation, the execution, and the administration of the Soviet dictatorship were all the products of Jewish brains, aided by a few Russian leaders, prominent as figure‑heads...

     As bearing on the part taken by Red Jews in the Bolshevik triumph over Russia, we quote Dr. Angelo S. Rappaport, a Jewish writer, who published a book in 1918 called Pioneers of the Russian Revolution: 'To a greater degree than the Poles, the Letts, or Fins, or, indeed, any other ethnic group in the vast Empire of the Romanovs, the Jews have been the artisans of the revolution of 1917...It is no exaggeration to say that the small, even insignificant, amount of freedom obtained by the Russian Liberals in 1905 and 1906 was largely due to the effort of the Jews...There was no political organization in the vast Empire that was not influenced by Jews or directed by them...Throughout history the spirit of the Jew has always been revolutionary and subversive...Long before they had been formulated in French, the principles of the 'Rights of Man' had been announced in Hebrew...The Russian Jews, the pioneers of the revolution, are not continuing to fight for the cause of Justice, for the principles of Democracy against German Militarism.'

     When the Jewish and Russian Bolsheviks seized power, Red Jews flocked to the scene from all countries, and reinforced the brains and hands of the murderous tyranny. Mr. Robert Wilton, for seventeen years correspondent of The Times in Russia, and who was decorated for his work on the Russian front in the earlier part of the later war, wrote a book, The Last Days of the Romanoffs. This book showed that the murder of the Czar and is family was the work of Red Jews, and that they prepared the whole revolution, and became masters of Russia from their domination of all the important offices under the Soviet. He wrote in 1920: 'The Jewish domination in Russia is supported by certain Russians...they are all mere screens or dummies behind which the Sverdlovs and the thousand and one Jews of Sovdepia continue their work of destruction.'

     After this Mr. Wilton's chances in English journalism were gone. He was a true British patriot; and he died in very straitened circumstances in France in January, 1925, No one who has paid the slightest attention to the course of Russian events since the Bolshevik accession to power in November, 1917, can have failed to know that, when all the important members of the Russian aristocracy, the learned profession, the Army and Navy, had been executed, or imprisoned, or driven abroad, Red Jews were in possession of the great majority of responsible positions in and under the Soviet. So clear was this that, in the past, Jewish apologists, here and in America, have explained the fact by the true statement that only among the Jews could be found any longer the brains and business experience for filling important posts. Yet in the face of this situation there have been dozens of books published in English, and innumerable articles throughout the Press, and any number of lectures delivered, all with the astounding omission of any mention of Jewish handiwork in Russian Bolshevism. There have been public references to the sufferings of some orthodox non‑Communist Jews at the hand of the Soviet.

     Newspapers bear witness to a censorship over them by what they omit to publish, and by their sketchy apologetic mention of incidents tending to produce undesired conclusions about the march of events. Authors can safely reckon on the freufal of book publishers to produce any book unorthodox to current propaganda which supports the censorship. Mr. Ford ran a newspaper of his own, in which for several years the world‑wide question of growing Jewish predominance was treated; but so much pressure was brought to bear on him that he had to drop the subject and recant all he had published thereon, although he had not himself written the articles.

     Censorship over the enormous propaganda of 'Labor,' in the formation of public opinion, is rendered easy by the almost unanimous sympathy of the Socialist and Communist elements, constituting the party, with everything originating in Russia: a senseless sympathy based on the belief that Sovetism is a demonstration, if 'a crude one, of the practicability of Socialism.

     A very recent illustration can be cited here in support of some of the above statements. The Patriot has been the vehicle of advertising a new book, The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by the Vicomte L. de Poncins. It is an English translation from the second edition of a French book, and treats of the influence of Grand Orient Freemasonry and of the Red Jews, in all revolutionary and subversive movements since the French Revolution. The publishers, on issue of the book here, sent review copies as usual to important daily and weekly papers to the number of eighty. Out of the eighty, one provincial newspaper gave a notice which was confined to less than one half the book, that portion relating to French Masonry; the larger portion, relating to Jewish activities, was not mentioned. It is obvious that such a book might provoke violent differences of opinion among reviewers; but, considering that it is a compilation from well‑known French, German and English writers, and that it treats of the vital question of the world revolution, of which the first step is the destruction of our Empire; considering these things, a universal silence cannot be accepted as natural.'

     Thanks to their dual citizenship in modern times, the Jews, while retaining their primary allegiance to their own nation and their devotion to the ideal of the domination of the natural messiahs, have been able to use their positions of power for the furtherance of their natural program which, as I have so often insisted is necessarily and inevitably opposed to the rule of Christ our King. And now unfortunately, the Balfour Declaration of November 2nd, 1917, would seem to have for effect the perpetuation of this anti‑Christ, anti‑Christian anomaly. For citizens of other states, citizenship is restricted to one State. Why should Jews be permitted to be citizens of two States? The anomaly is already glaring when they form a State within a State: it is doubly so when they have a Jewish State in Palestine. And it must always be remembered that it means keeping the enemies of Christ in a specially favored position.

     In Der Tag (Yiddish Daily), New York, 10th July, 1937: 'Hail the Jewish State in Palestine! For close on two thousand years it has lived only in the memory of an uprooted, wandering people. Conquered and leveled to the earth by the Roman hosts of Titus, aided by the hordes swarming across Europe from the primeval forests of old Germania, it is now about to rear its head once more, looking with new hope across the Mediterranean. It is our historic privilege, denied our forefathers for twenty centuries, to see the Jewish State revived again in the old historic site. The landless people, so long deprived of Nationhood, is landless and stateless no longer. Once more we are a member of the family of nations, recognized and welcomed as such. Our Ambassadors and Ministers will be found in every capital, and a seat will be reserved for us at the council table of the League of Nations [this has been fulfilled in the United Nations]. Even in Germany, whence two thousand years ago came those who destroyed us, just as today they plot our ruin, we shall have our envoy speaking for us proudly, courageously, as one Government representative to another. Washington the center of Jewish hope in the Western World, will count the Jewish Ambassador among the youngest members of its diplomatic family ...Hail the new Jewish State!' [14]

     An Ambassador represents a foreign nation in the capital of the country to which he is accredited. The Jews are, therefore, on their own admission members of a foreign nation in the various countries in which they for the time being dwell. The members of a nation which is represented by a foreign ambassador to the Government of a country, cannot logically at the same time occupy posts in the Government and seats in the Parliament of the country in question. That would be an intolerable anomaly, for example in the case of Frenchmen in Germany and Italians in England. The same must hold good for the Jews, in fact, it must hold a fortiori in their case because of their naturalistic messianic aims. The setting up of the Jewish State must logically lead to the elimination of Jews from the public life of England, Ireland and other countries.

     By the fact of the Jews becoming citizens of a Jewish State and ceasing to be citizens of other States another evil can be remedied. The small minority of sincere Jewish converts to Catholicism have up to the present always for all practical purposes been excluded from their own nation. The Jews insisted upon the 'rights of minorities,' that is, their 'rights,' being safeguarded in the treaties at the end of the Great War. We must insist upon the rights of the minority of Catholic Jews and see that those who accept the false messiahs must have special guarantees against ostracism and social injustice on the part of their own people. the Jewish State cannot treat its minority differently from the way the Jews claimed that they should be treated in the States of Western Europe. They surely cannot always expect to have it both ways.

     It is not easy to combat Jewish Naturalism in public life and at the same time keep oneself free from racial hatred, which is itself but a form of naturalism. Yet is must be done. On March 25th, 1928, the Congregation of the Holy Office abolished the association called The Friends of Israel, which in action and language had departed from the mind of the Church and of the Fathers and had adopted a mode of procedure abhorrent to the liturgy, thus falling into naturalism. Nevertheless in that same decree the Church insists upon the fact that she 'habitually prays for the Jewish people who crucified our Lord and Savior; on account of their blindness. Actuated by this spirit of charity Christians have protected this people against unjust treatment.

     After all that has already been said, it will be easy to deal with the question of anti‑Semitism. What is meant by the term? Anti‑Semitism is the word used by the Jews to designate any form of opposition to themselves , and they strive persistently to associate irrationality and want of balance with the term. They evidently want the world to believe that anyone who opposes Jewish pretensions is more or less mentally deranged. In that sense, as there is only one Divine Plan for order in the world, every sane thinker must be an anti‑Semite. The Jewish World, February 9, 1883, contained the following program: 'The great ideal of Judaism is...that the whole world should be imbued with Jewish teachings, and that in a universal Brotherhood of nations, a greater Judaism in fact, All the Separate Races and Religions Shall Disappear. '" [15]

In review, we note that the world war had entered its fourth year in the latter part of 1917, with no indication of a rapid settlement in sight. The complexity and variety of events, increasing with the years, had emphasized its universal character. Every country engaged, whether America, Germany, Russia, Greece, France, Italy, or England, found its entire interests, political, economic, and ethnic, involved in the issue. All these nations seemed gripped in a deadlock, and at the same time felt the pressing need of deliverance.

Before 1917, it had been thought that if the allies continued to hold the western front, the Russian "steam roller" would crush the central powers by sheer force of numbers. But the "steam roller" had itself exploded: there had been a revolution, and, by the end of July, Russian troops had withdrawn from Bessarabia and Moldavia, and between the Dniester and the Pruth, leaving the eastern front undefended. If this loss was somewhat offset by the fact that America, in spite of the President's make believe reluctance, had finally joined the allies, it was still doubtful whether her forces would arrive in time and in sufficient numbers to be of real military value.

The scale on which the war was waged made all usual methods of reaching a settlement out of the question: no outside Power could be invoked as mediator; the Pope had issued a peace proposal on August 1, but the allies regarded it as inspired by Germany and turned a deaf ear.

Allied statesmen had cast about for some principle on which an honorable peace could be proposed, if a crushing defeat could not be inflicted on the enemy. The principle of nationalities, viz., the right of small nations to form their own government, had been advanced, and had met with general acceptance.

Thus America's object in entering the war, according to President Wilson, was "to deliver the peoples of the world from autocracy, to make the world safe for democracy," and the like. But the application of this principle presented difficulties. That Germany and Austria should be broken up into Poland, Czecho‑Slovakia, Hungary, Jugo‑Slavia, etc., in the way that afterward occurred, was one matter; but the example of Russia, and the possibility of the principle being applied to England, then troubled by Irish agitators, and the other allies, led many to dread a completely dismembered Europe.

Forgotten and totally ignored by most historians was the real reason behind World War I. That being: When, in 1896, Germany obtained from the Sultan the concession for the Baghdad Railway and reached out over Palestine towards India, some leading Western Jews were alarmed and felt the need of uniting Jewry. The only basis of union was the Eastern program, for the Eastern group, being fanatics, would accept no other.

To win over the western group to the new aim, an assimilated Jewish writer, Theodore Herzl, was called on to paraphrase Leo Pinsker's Auto‑emancipation (Whose direct orders Herzl was obeying is not clear: probably those of David Wolfsohn, acknowledged leader of western Jewry at the time]. This paraphrase, published in 1896, bore the title, The Jewish State. There was little that was original about the book, but the character and influence of the author carried much weight.

Theodore Herzl was a typical assimilated Jew [His enemies in the Zionist camp later hurled the epithet "assimilated" at him to express their scorn for his moderation]. Born in Hungary in 1860, after finishing school in Budapest and studying law at the university of Vienna, he devoted himself to journalism and literature. As a reporter for the Viennese paper, Die neue freie Presse, he worked in Spain and later in France. While in Paris, he reported on the Dreyfus case, under the influence of another Jew, the famous Dr. Blowitz, correspondent of the London Times.

It is said that the Dreyfus case "made a Jew of Herzl." He did not know Hebrew, and had never been taught the fanatical books of the Talmud, such as the Shulchan Aruk and the Abodah Zarah. He was opposed to violent methods, and in one of his novels, Altneuland, has left a picture of a civilized Jewish state, patterned on those of Western Europe. But it was a false hope, for The Jews, like the Blacks, have never been able to build a Civilization from within their own ranks, they cannot build anything good; They can only build Evil: They can only Destroy!

In any case after the publication of The Jewish State, the Friends of Zion in Odessa, and the body of students (Kadimah) under Nathan Birnbaum, adopted Herzl. The first Zionist congress was called at Basle the following year (1897). Herzl was elected president, a position which he held until he was assassinated in 1904.

At the congress, as the eastern group was the more numerous, the name "Zionism," coined by Nathan Birnbaum in 1886, was adopted, and its aim declared essentially democratic. But the western group was not wholly won. Some of them, mostly from England and France, responded coldly to Herzl's appeal, fearing to compromise the rights and positions already acquired in those countries. The desired union could not yet be effected, and the two groups rallied around their respective leaders, Herzl and Ginzberg.

Herzl nevertheless remained faithful to the task he had undertaken [Osiah Tonn mentions several letters of Herzl, expressing the wish to retire form the Zionist movement as soon as possible]. He entered into negotiations with the rulers of several nations to obtain some suitable home for the Jews. He failed to get Palestine from the Sultan, and later the El Arish peninsula from Khedive of Egypt; but he received, and virtually accepted, the offer of Uganda from Great Britain. In 1903, he laid his proposal before the sixth Zionist congress: it was thrown out by the Zionists who would have no land but Palestine. Because they realized they could not continue the deception as the "Chosen People" if they were to accept any other place. Herzl died the following year, and with him the leadership of the moderate party was soon to pass into the hands of the violent nationalists [David Wolfsohn succeeded Herzl as president for a short time].

An article in The Judisk Tidskrift, written by Dr. Ehrenpreis, Chief Rabbi of Sweden, contained, according to the Swedish paper Nationen, the following passage:

"I participated with Herzl in the first Zionist Congress which was held in Basle in 1897. Herzl was the most prominent figure at that first Jewish World Congress. He worked to achieve an object which had been fixed beforehand. Just as Isaiah foresaw, decades before the event occurred, the victorious power of Cyrus before anyone else, so did Herzl foresee twenty years, before we experienced them, the revolutions brought about by the Great War, and he prepared us for that which was going to happen. He foresaw the splitting up of Turkey, and he foresaw that England would obtain control over Palestine. 'We may expect important developments in the world.' These were the words spoken by Herzl twenty years before the Great War. He added that the events would offer the Jewish people fresh opportunities." [16]

It is very clear that Herzl was under the instruction of the Jewish Cahalla and had been told their long range plans. And rabbi Ehrenpreis, thought that Herzl had foreseen all that was to happen. Never knowing himself that those events were cleverly laid out years before.

This we know by the Jews own admission. In his novel Coningsby (London, 1844), Disraeli drew a picture form the life of the Jews ruling the world from behind the thrones as graphic as anything in the Protocols of Nilus. Many believe, and it has been proved to most, Coningsby was a plagiarism of a Byzantine novel of the XVIIth century. The passage in which Rothschild (Sidonia) describes this is as follows:

     "If I followed my own impulse, I would remain here," said Sidonia. "Can anything be more absurd than that a nation should apply to an individual to maintain its credit, and with its credit, its existence as an empire and its comfort as a people; and that individual one to whom its laws deny the proudest rights of citizenship, the privilege of sitting in its senate and of holding land; for though I have been rash enough to buy several estates, my own opinion is that by the existing law of England, an Englishman of Jewish faith cannot possess the soil.'

     'But surely it would be easy to repeal a law so illiberal.'

     'Oh! as for illiberality, I have no objection to it if it be an element of power. Eschew political sentimentality. What I contend is that If you permit men to accumulate property, and they use that permission to a great extent, power is inseparable from that property , and it is in the last degree impolitic to make it in the interest of any powerful class to oppose the institutions under which they live. The Jews, for example, independent of the capital qualities for citizenship which they possess in their industry, temperance, and energy and vivacity of mind, are a race essentially monarchical, deeply religious and shrinking themselves from converts as from a calamity, are ever anxious to see the religious systems of the countries in which they live, flourish; yet since your society has become agitated in England and powerful combinations menace your institutions, you find the once loyal Jew invariably arrayed in the same ranks as the leveller and the latitudinarian, and prepared to support rather than tamely continue under a system which seeks to degrade him. The Tories lose an important election at a critical moment; 'Its the Jews who come forward to vote against them. The Church is alarmed at the scheme of a latitudinarian university, and learns with relief that funds are not forthcoming for its establishment; a Jew immediately advances and endows it. Yet the Jews, Coningsby, are essentially Tories. Toryism indeed is but copied from the mighty prototype which has fashioned Europe. And every generation they must become more powerful and more dangerous to the society which is hostile to them. Do you think that the quiet humdrum persecution of a decorous representative of an English university can crush those who have successively baffled the Pharaos, Nebuchadnezzar, Rome, and the feudal ages? The fact is You Cannot Destroy A Pure Race of White Organization [Here is the secret, and a Rothschild is telling us why the Jews are trying to destroy the White Race. It is because the Jews know, if the race is kept pure, it cannot be destroyed; because it will be protected by Almighty God and the Lord Jesus Christ!]. It is a physiological fact; a simple law of nature, which has baffled Egyptian and Assyrian kings, Roman emperors, and Christian inquisitors. No penal laws, no physical tortures, can effect that a superior race should be absorbed in an inferior, or be destroyed by it. The mixed persecuting races disappear, the pure persecuted race remains. And at this moment in spite of centuries, or tens of centuries, of degradation, the Jewish mind exercises a vast influence on the affairs of Europe. I speak of their laws, which you still obey; of their literature, with which your minds are saturated; but of the living Jewish intellect.

     You never observe a great intellectual movement in Europe in which the Jews do not greatly participate. The first Jesuits were Jews; that mysterious Russian diplomacy which so alarms Western Europe is organized and principally carried on by Jews; that mighty revolution (of 1848) which will be in fact [followed] by a second an greater Reformation, and of which so little is as yet known in England, is entirely developing under the auspices of Jews, who almost monopolize the professorial chairs of Germany. Neander the founder of Spiritual Christianity, and who is Regius Professor of Divinity in the University of Berlin, is a Jew. Benary, equally famous and in the same university, is a Jew. Wehl, the Arabic Professor of Heidelberg, is a Jew. Years ago, when I was in Palestine, I met a German student who was accumulating materials for the history of Christianity and studying the genius of the place; a modest and learned man. It was Wehl; then unknown, since become the first Arabic scholar of the day, and the author of the life of Mohamet. But for the German professors of this race, their name is legion. I think there are more than ten at Berlin alone.

     I told you just now that I was going up to town tomorrow, because I always made it a rule to interpose when affairs of state were on the carpet. Otherwise, I never interfere. I hear of peace and war in the newspapers, but I am never alarmed, except when I am informed that the sovereigns want treasure; then I know that monarchs are serious.

     A few years back we were applied to by Russia. Now there has been no friendship between the Court of St. Petersburg and my family. It has Dutch connections which have generally supplied it; and our representations in favor of the Polish Jews, a numerous race, but the most suffering and degraded of all the tribes, have not been very agreeable to the Czar. However circumstances drew to an approximation between the Romanoffs and the Sidonias. I resolved to go myself to St. Petersburg. I had on my arrival an interview with the Russian Minister of Finance, Count Cancrin; I beheld the son of a Lithuanian Jew. The loan was connected with the affairs of Spain; I resolved on repairing to Spain from Russia. I travelled without intermission. I had an audience immediately on my arrival with the Spanish minister Senior Mendizabel; I behold one like myself, the some of Nuevo Christiano, a Jew of Aragon. In consequence of what transpired at Madrid, I went straight to Paris to consult the President of the French Council; I beheld the son of a French Jew, a hero, an imperial marshal and very properly so, for who should be military heroes if not those of the Jewish faith.'

     'And is Soult a Jew?'

     'Yes, and others of the French marshals, and the most famous Massna, for example; his real name was Mannasheh: but to my anecdote. The consequence of our consultations was that some northern power should be applied to in a friendly and mediative capacity. We fixed on Prussia, and the President of the Council made an application to the Prussian minister, who attended a few days after our conference. Count Arnim entered the cabinet, and I beheld a Prussian Jew. So you see, my dear Coningsby, that The World is Governed by Very Different Personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes. " [17]

Rollin, Pierred Leroux, and a group of socialists, among whom was Maurice Joly [His father was Philippe Lambert Joly, born at Dieppe, Attorney‑General of the Jura under Louis‑Philippe for ten years. His mother Florentine Corbara Courtois, was the daughter of Laurent Courtois, paymaster‑general of Corsica, who had an inveterate hatred of Napoleon I. Maurice Joly was born in 1831 at Lons‑le‑Saulnier and educated at Dijon: there he had begun his law studies, but left for Paris in 1849 to secure a post in the Ministry of the Interior under M. Chevreau and just before the coup d'etat. He did not finish his law studies till 1860. Committed suicide in 1878].

Joly, some thirty years younger than Cremieux, with an inherited hatred of the Bonapartes, seems to have fallen very largely under his influence. Through Cremieux, Joly became acquainted with communists and their writings. Though, until 1871 when his ambition for a government post turned him into a violent communist, he had not in 1864 gone beyond socialism, he was so impressed with the way they presented their arguments that he could not, if the chance were offered, refrain from imitating it. And this chance came in 1864‑1865, when his hatred of Napoleon, whetted by Cremieux, led him to publish anonymously in Brussels the Dialogues aux Enfers entre Machiavelli et Montesquieu. In this work he tells us,

"Machiavelli represents the policy of Might, while Montesquieu stands for that of Right: Machiavelli will be Napoleon, who will himself describe his abominable policy.' It was natural that he should choose the Italian Machiavelli to stand for Bonaparte, and the Frenchman Montesquieu, for the ideal statesman: it was equally natural that he should put in the mouth of Machiavelli some of the same expressions which Venedey had put in it, and which Joly had admired. His own view was: 'Socialism seems to me one of the forms of a new life for the people emancipated from the traditions of the old world. I accept a great many of the solutions offered by socialism; but I reject communism, either as a social factor, or as a political institution. Communism is but a school of socialism. In politics, I understand extreme means to gain one's ends, in that at least, I am a Jacobin."

The French authorities, however, penetrated the thinly‑disguised satire: Joly was arrested and sentenced to two years imprisonment (April, 1865). But the Dialogues had pleased Cremieux as much as they had displeased the emperor, and, when his term expired, his Jewish patron rallied to his support: Joly was able to found a legal review, Le Palais, with Jules Favre, Desmaret, Leblond, Arago, Berryer, and Adolphe Cremieux as its principal stockholders.

With the fall of Napoleon III, Adolphe Cremieux once more took an open part in politics. Pushing to the front his former secretary, Gambetta, he directed through him the negotiations with Bismarck. Bismarck himself was guided by the Jew Bamberger (1832‑1899), a former revolutionary of '48, but who had for years managed the Paris branch of the Jewish bank Bischofsheim & Goldschmidt; he was also a friend of Cremieux. A third Jew in the negotiations was the son of James Rothschild [Bismarck, who had met the latter's grandfather, knew that Rothschild's real name was Meyer, and regarded him as an "Jewish citizen of Frankfurt," hence a German subject. To make matters worse, the victor was obliged to discuss the terms of peace with this renegade subject in French, the language of the vanquished, because Rothschild professed not to understand German. Corti, House of Rothschild Vol. II]. In this way, care was taken that the treaty should be satisfactory, if not entirely to the signatories, yet at least so to the Alliance Israelite Universelle.

From then (1871) until his death in 1880, as President of the Alliance Israelite Universelle and Supreme Master of the Scottish Rite, Cremieux was one of the promoters of the anti‑clerical movement following the Franco‑Prussian war. His favorite theme was that there should be one cult: speaking at a general assembly of the Alliance he said:

"The Alliance is not limited to our cult; it voices its appeal to all cults and wants to penetrate in all religions, as it has penetrated into all countries. Let us endeavor boldly to bring about the union of all cults under one flag of 'Union and Progress': such is the motto of humanity." [18]

One cult, one flag. Are the Protocols of Nilus, or the words of Machiavelli in Joly's book or in Venedey's book, anything but an elaborate exposition of the ideas thus briefly expressed by Cremieux? His activities are one of the best examples of Jewish internationalism. Thus the principal attempt to discredit the Protocols leads directly into historical studies which substantiate and illustrate their doctrine in a remarkable and unexpected manner.

The fact, that the "existing non‑Jewish communities in Palestine" represented at the time 92 percent of the total population did not discourage the British Government from giving its support to Zionist aspirations. Nor was the British Government deterred by the fact that it had given earlier assurances and pledges to the Arabs regarding their independence after the war.

These pledges were contained in the McMahon‑Hussain correspondence of 1915‑1918, the Anglo‑French Declaration of Nov. 1918, the Hogarth Message of Jan. 1918, the Declaration to the "seven" of June 1916, and in General Allenby's assurances to the inhabitants of Palestine, Syria and Lebanon. At a meeting of the Supreme Council of the Allied Powers at Paris on March 20, 1919, General Allenby, Commander‑in‑chief of the Expeditionary force which wrested Palestine, Syria and Lebanon from Ottoman control declared that "the Allies were honor bound to endeavor to reach a settlement in accordance with the wishes of the peoples concerned."

In the McMahon‑Hussain Correspondence, Britain promised Sherif Hussain of Mecca to create an independent state of the Arabs as a reward for the alliance with it against Turkey in the First World War. At the same time Britain was negotiating secretly with France; the second major imperialist power of the time, on the division of Arab land into spheres of influence between them.

In the Sykes‑Picot agreement of 1916, Sir Mark Sykes (1873‑1919) a distinguished British orientalist, and Charles Georges Picot, formerly French Consul in Beirut, prepared a draft agreement about the post‑war division of the Middle East, which was approved, in principle by Russia. Thus the Jews, after centuries of dispersion, were to be established in a homeland. Here was poetic justice; it seems as though nineteen centuries of alleged wrongs were to be righted.

Having obtained the British Government's declaration of sympathy with Zionist aims, the next objective of the Zionists was to secure its implementation by Great Britain. This they succeeded in doing. The mandate which the League of Nations entrusted to Great Britain in 1922 to administer Palestine provided that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the Declaration made on Nov. 2, 1917 in favor of the establishment on Palestine of a national home for the "Jewish People."

The League of Nations, by admitting the Balfour Declaration into the terms of the British Mandate, violated its own Covenant, by lending support to the Zionist cause, and by helping a process of dispossession and displacement of the native Arab population, instead of preparing it for independence as it was supposed to do.

During the 30 years of British rule the Jewish emigrants converged to Palestine from all over the world, taking advantage of the legislative measures and assistance of the mandatory power whose policies were intended to realize the Balfour Declaration.

The first Governor of Palestine was a British Zionist (Herbert Samuel). He was dubbed then the King of Israel because he was the initiator of the state of Israel by allowing a flood of Jewish emigrants disguised as pilgrims to the Holy Land to settle in Palestine, permitting them to train and arm themselves and facilitating land transfer from Arabs to Jews under the guise of British grants to Zionist institutions.

Thus the Balfour Declaration was not just a document to secure the entrance of the United States into World War I on the side of England, or to secure a temporary national homeland for the Jews in the diaspora as was claimed by British Premier David Lloyd George, but a declaration to create a Zionist entity as an alien ethnic wedge in the heart of the Arab land, to separate the Arab people of Asia from the Arabs of North Africa, i.e., a spearhead to shatter any attempts to unify the Arab nation to develop and advance the unified Arab community.

From the beginning of the mandate, British policy toward the indigenous Arab community in Palestine was marked by a refusal to recognize its national existence. The Arabs invariably were described as the non‑Jewish communities (the Balfour Declaration) or simply as "the other sections of the population," where it was necessary to distinguish between them and the immigrants, the use of the terms "Muslim," "Christian" or "Jews" was adopted.

The fiction that Palestine was inhabited only by a small number of people, or by desperate religious sects, was encouraged. In this context it was easier to add another, the Jewish community, without such action being seen internationally as a denial of the right of those already present. What was especially provocative as far as the Arabs were concerned was the decision to give the Jewish Agency a special role in formulating mandatory policy while the Arabs, who still constituted the overwhelming majority of the population, were denied any representation at all. As a result of this policy major rioting broke out in 1921 and 1929 between Palestinian Arabs and the ever increasing number of Jewish immigrants.

Jewish immigration into Palestine declined from 1929 until 1933, but when the Nazis came to power in Germany, the rate of immigration increased to more then 30,000 a year as compared to 9,500 in 1932. By 1935 the number of Jewish immigrants had risen to 61,800. A genuine and unbridgeable conflict of interest grew between the Zionists and the native Palestinians. The Jewish underground army, the Haganah, was created during this period.

The ensuing frictions led to serious disturbances between the Arab and Jewish communities in 1936. "The Peel Commission" was set up in the same year and in July 1937 it recommended the creation of a Jewish and an Arab state in Palestine with Jerusalem remaining under British control. The recommendations were opposed by both communities.

                                                                         The Zionists' Claim

The Zionists have advanced different arguments in support of the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine. These arguments are:

   1). The religious argument, which is, in effect, that God promised to give Palestine to the Jews; this promise was made to their ancestors, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; pointing to the Old Testament of the Christians' Bible. [This has already been proven false, as the Jews are not Semites; They are not Descendents of Abraham, Isaac or Jacob! They are the descendents of Japheth, not Shem.

   2). The "statelessness" of the Jews, a people without a country, and that they should have one in which to live, practice their religion, and develop their own culture; and that since they once lived in Palestine, they should be allowed to return to it;

    3). That the Balfour Declaration of 1917 granted them Palestine, and this grant was confirmed by the League of Nations;

   4). That the United Nations grated them the right in 1947 to establish a Jewish state in Palestine.

As we have already stated all the Zionist claims are false, but in fairness, lets look at these arguments in the order listed above.

                                                              The "Promised Land" Argument

We could go into a discussion that would take a thousand pages, and prove that the Jews have no claim to Palestine from the Scriptures, but we believe that Frank C. Sakran, in his Palestine Still A Dilemma, provides what would probably be the easiest to understand for those who are not intensive Bible students. Therefore we will present his writings on the subject for your review, study and thoughts:

     "In this age of space flights, moon exploration, and nuclear power, it seems ridiculous to discuss the merits of a claim by a group of foreign persons to a country on the grounds that some four thousand years ago God promised it to them. But the claim is based on passages in the Bible, which are read and believed not only by Zionists and other Jews but also by Christians and which are quoted in Sunday morning sermons by thousands of Christian ministers and read to children in Sunday schools and to adult Bible classes in thousands of parishes every week. This has caused some people to believe and assert that the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948 is a fulfillment of God's four thousand‑year‑old promise.

     Besides, in his book The Birth and Destiny of Israel, David Ben‑Gurion, Israel's first prime minister, said that the Bible gives the Jews a 'sacrosanct title‑deed to Palestine.'

     For these reasons it is deemed necessary to discuss this claim fully, and in doing so we shall restrict ourselves to the words of the Bible. Because it is the most widely read, we shall use the King James edition unless otherwise indicated.

     The book of Genesis, which contains the material in question, says that the promise was originally made to Abraham in Haran, Syria, after his father, Terah, brought the family from Ur of the Chaldees to go to the land of Canaan, but Terah decided to stay in Haran, where he died [19] . Shortly after Terah's death, the Lord appeared to Abram and said, 'Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee.' [20]

     Abram, in obedience to this command, folded up his tent, took his wife Sarai, his nephew Lot, and their flocks and shepherds and proceeded by stages to Palestine, finally pitching tents in the plain of Moreh near Sichem. Her God appeared to him again and said, 'Unto thy seed will I give this land.' [21]

     Abram did not remain in this area very long. He moved southward and, because of a drought that caused famine in Palestine, went down to Egypt. He was expelled from that country when it was discovered that he had falsely told the Egyptians that Sarai was his sister. It seems that Sarai was so beautiful that the Pharaoh decided to marry her. As was the custom, he bestowed lavish gifts upon Abram. Pharaoh, discovering the truth, returned Sarai to Abram and ordered him out of the country but let him keep the gifts he had given him. So Abram returned to Palestine richer than when he had left it.

     Abraham (his name had been changed from Abram to Abraham) repeated this unmanly performance at Gerar and led Abimelech, king of Gerar, to take Sarah (Sarai) for a wife. Before touching her, however, the Lord appeared to Abimelech in a dream and told him that the woman had a husband. Abimelech pleaded his innocence, and early the next morning summoned Abraham and demanded, 'What possessed you to do this?' Abraham replied, 'I thought there would be no fear of God here and that the people would kill me because of my wife.' So Abimelech took sheep, cattle, men and women slaves, and presented them to Abraham, and gave him back his wife, plus a thousand pieces of silver.

     Abimalech, who was a Philistine king, gave Abraham permission to graze within his domain but made him swear that he would never again trick him or his descendants.

     Isaac, too, represented his wife, Rebekah, as his sister in Gerar. But Abimalech discovered the truth and told his people, 'whoever touches this man or his wife shall be put to death.' [Or was this a mistake made by the author of Genesis, attributing to Isaac what Abraham had done?]

     Shortly after returning from Egypt, Abram's (Abraham's) and Lot's shepherds began to quarrel over pasture and water. To put an end to this quarrel, Abraham suggested to his nephew that they part and told him to choose the area in which he preferred to live. 'And Lot lifted up his eyes and behold all the plain of Jordan, that it was well watered every where, before the Lord destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, even as the garden of the Lord, like the land of Egypt.' [22]

     So Lot decided to move there. Abram (Abraham) remained in the land of Canaan. 'Abram dwelled in the land of Canaan, and Lot dwelled in the cities of the plain, and pitched his tent toward Sodom.' [23]

     'And the Lord said unto Abram, after that Lot was separated form him, Life up now thine eyes, and look from the place where thou art northward, and southward, and eastward, and westward: For all the land which thou seest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed forever. And I will make thy seed as the dust of the earth: so that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy seed also be numbered. Arise, walk through the land in the length of it and in the breadth of it; for I will give it unto thee.' [24]

     Despite God's assurance that his seed would be as numerous 'as the dust of the earth,' Abram complains in Genesis 15 that he has no heir to inherit his estate, mostly domestic animals. So the Lord again assured him that he will have children. 'And he brought him forth abroad, and said, Look now toward heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him, So shall thy seed be. And he believed in the Lord; and he counted it to him for righteousness. And he said unto him, I am the Lord that brought thee out of Ur of the Chaldees, to give thee this land to inherit it.' [25]

     A few verses later on, we read, 'In the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river the river Euphrates.' [26] [This is quite an expansion of the territory promised early that day].

     But Abram still had no children, and his wife Sarai who was getting along in years and knew it, feared that the wealth they had amassed would be inherited by their steward, a man from Damascus named Eliezer. So Sarai decided that Abram should marry another woman. She chose her maid, an Egyptian named Hagar, perhaps given to her by Pharaoh, to be his second wife. 'And Sarai Abram's wife took Hagar her maid the Egyptian, after Abram had dwelt ten years in the land of Canaan, and gave her to her husband Abram to be his wife. And he went in unto Hagar, and she conceived: and when she saw that she had conceived, her mistress was despised in her eyes.' [27]

     Naturally enough, Sarai did not like that. And, after obtaining Abram's grudging consent, she retaliated vigorously with the result that Hagar ran away into the wilderness where an 'angel of the Lord found her by a fountain of water' and said to her, 'I will multiply thy seed exceedingly, that it shall not be numbered for multitude.' The angel also told her that she will give birth to a son who shall be named Ishmael, who 'shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.' [28] As ordered by the angel, Hagar returned home. In due time, she gave birth to a son, Ishmael. Abram was comforted.

     Not long after Israel's birth, when Abram was ninety‑nine years old, the Lord again appeared to him and said, 'And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God.' [29]

     It was at this time that God made a covenant with Abram and his 'seed' and ordained the rite of circumcision as 'a token of the covenant betwixt me and you.' Abram promptly obeyed and had himself and 'every man child' in his household, including Ishmael, circumcised, for he was told that any man 'not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people.' [30] During this conversation, the Lord also told Abram that his wife Sarai will have a son, and that hence forth his name should not be Abram but Abraham, 'for a father of many nations have I made thee.' Sarai's name also was ordered changed to Sarah.

     The Lord also assured Abraham regarding Ishmael, saying: 'And as for Ishmael, I have heard thee: Behold, I have blessed him, and will make him fruitful, and will multiply him exceedingly; twelve princes shall he beget, and I will make him a great nation. But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next year.' [31] Both Abraham and Sarah were now advanced in years, and it was hard for them to believe that Sarah would have a son. But she did, and he was named Isaac.

     The birth of Isaac caused trouble in Abraham's household. Sarah, who herself had suggested his second marriage and had chosen his second wife, now did not want to see Hagar or her son around the camp. 'Wherefore she said unto Abraham, Cast out this bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with my son, even with Isaac. And the thing was very grievous in Abraham's sight because of his son. And God said unto Abraham, Let it not be grievous in thy sight because of the lad, and because of thy bondwoman; in all that Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for in Issac shall thy seed be called. And also of the son of the bondwoman will I made a nation, because he is thy seed.' [32] Hagar's son married an Egyptian girl. But Isaac, in accordance with his father's wishes, married Rebekah, daughter of Bethuel, son of Nahor, Abraham's brother.

     Sarah died at the age of one hundred and twenty‑seven. She was buried in the cave of Macphelah, located in a field at Hebron which Abraham purchased from one Ephron, the son of Zohar, for four hundred shekels of silver. This Field is the only plot of Land which he ever Owned ! Abraham was a nomad and, like all nomads, roamed over the countryside in search of greener pastures. He had no need to own land. He needed only permission to set up camp temporarily and to graze his flocks.

     Although Abraham was very old when Sarah died, he married again. 'Then again Abraham took a wife, and her name was Keturah. And she bare him Zimran, and Jokshan, and Medan, and Midian, and Ishbak, and Shuah. And Jokshan begat Sheba, and Dedan. And the sons of Dedan were Asshurim, and Letushim, and Leummim. And the sons of Midian; Ephah, and Epher, and Hanoch, and Abidah, and Eladah. All these were the children of Keturah. And Abraham gave all that he had unto Isaac. But unto the sons of the concubines, which Abraham had, Abraham gave gifts, and sent them away from Isaac his son, while he yet lived, eastward, unto the east country. And these are the days of the years of Abraham's life which he lived, a hundred three‑score and fifteen years. Then Abraham gave up the ghost, and died in a good old age, an old man, full of years; and was gathered to his people. And his sons Isaac and Ishmael buried him in the cave of Macphelah, in the field of Ephron the son of Zohar the Hittite, which is before Mamre.' [33]

     Today there is a great Islamic mosque over the graves which is called 'Al Khalili Mosque' in reference to Abraham, who is called Abraham Al Khalil, which means the fried (of God).

     Ishmael, Abraham's oldest son, had twelve sons. 'And these are the names of the sons of Ishmael, by their names, according to their generations: the firstborn of Ishmael, Nebajoth; and Kedar, and Adbeel, and Mibsam, And Mishma, and Dumah, and Massa, Hadar, and Tema, Jetur, Naphish, and Kedemah: These are the sons of Ishamel, and these are their names, by their towns, and by their castles; twelve princes according to their nations.'" [34]

                                                                           The Fulfillment

     It will be observed from the foregoing that Abraham was assured by God that he personally would be given the 'land of Canaan,' yet he lived and died a nomad, neither ruling over nor owning any part of the country except the burial plot at Hebron. Likewise, the promises made to his son Isaac, and to his grandson Jacob, or Israel, were never fulfilled. Both lived in the country as nomads at the sufferance of the Canaanite or Philistine people and their rulers. Both were buried in the same plot that Abraham had purchased for the purpose of burying his wife Sarah.

     The only other land owned by any of them was the small plot that Jacob purchased for the purpose of erecting an altar and which was abandoned when he and is sons moved to Egypt.

     It will be recalled that while Jacob was in Syria where he went to escape his brother Esau's wrath, the lord said to him, 'Return unto the land of thy fathers.' Yet his 'fathers' Isaac and Abraham owned no land whatsoever, other than the grave site at Hebron. Of course the Lord knew that. Why then did he tell Jacob to go to the land of his fathers?

     Abraham had obtained permission from the Canaanites to live and graze his flocks in their country. Isaac exercised that privilege after his father's death. Could the Lord have meant to tell Jacob to leave Syria and take the flocks he had acquired there to Canaan where he, too, would enjoy the privilege of camping and grazing his flocks as his father and his grandfather had done? Could this have been what God meant when he told the patriarchs that he would give them the land inhabited by the Canaanites?

     If this is what God meant, then his promises were fulfilled. But if He meant to give them exclusive possession and control, the obviously He did not fulfill His promises either to the three patriarchs themselves or to their immediate descendants, for Jacob and his sons moved to Egypt, and their descendants remained there four hundred years until Moses led them out.

     The reader is familiar with the beautiful story of Joseph, who was sold by his brothers to the Ishmaelite merchants, who took him to Egypt where he became an adviser to the pharaoh, or prime minister, after interpreting a dream for the pharaoh. The Bible says that Joseph later brought his brothers and his father to Egypt and settled them in 'the land of Goshen,' a lush area in the Nile delta. Jacob soon died and his sons took him to Palestine and buried him in the cave of Macphelah with his father and grandfather.

     It may be relevant to repeat here that before Jacob returned from Syria, his brother Esau had become a powerful chief and Jacob did not dare cross the border without his permission. Esau settled in Seir, the southeastern part or Palestine (the Negeb), permanently and eventually became master of that region. When the children of Israel came out of Egypt under Moses, the children of Esau, or Edom as he was also known, denied them permission to pass through their territory. During the Roman period, Edomite kings ruled in Judea.

     These facts indicate that the Lord granted possession of this land or a part of it to Esau, in fulfillment of his promises to Abraham and Isaac. It should be recalled that Esau was the elder son of Isaac, and under th