GORBACHEV'S FORUM: A five-day State of the World Forum, organized by the Gorbachev Foundation, convened in San Francisco

Gorbachev's Forum: A five-day State of the World Forum, organized by the Gorbachev Foundation, convened in San Francisco on September 27 with over 1000 guests and participants chosen from 50 nations. The communist leader told his hand-picked "council of the wise" that a new set of inclusive universal values must replace the Christian world view. "The wisdom distilled by all faiths" must determine the values needed to guide the world into the 21st century. The religious leaders incited to address the Forum taught pantheism (all is god since one cosmic force connects all things), universalism (all paths lead to the same goal), and monism (all is one). Among them were New Age educator Willis Harman, Esalen co-founder Michael Murphy, the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation Founder Sonia Gandhi, and the respective leaders of Vietnamese, Mongolian, and Cambodian Buddhism. Representatives of the Christian faith were not invited!

Forum leaders called for "global governance" (the end of national sovereignty) and a ninety percent reduction of the population! Carl Sagan scolded those who still view the minuscule individuals of the earth as significant pieces in the immense cosmic puzzle. What counters is the collective whole, not the people themselves. The Forum agenda is part of the New Age paradigm shift (change of culture or worldview) deemed essential for the New World Order. It was noted that in Gorbachev's final message which summarized his agenda, the words and phrases he used also permeate literature describing today's Outcome-Based Education. This concept of world governance without God was tried long ago at a place called Babel. God didn't lie it, and put a swift end to it. [1]

Thought Police: Recent court rulings have held that the First Amendment may not protect speech if what is said is considered offensive or harmful in some way. Under a federal statute (Public Law 101-275), what you think and believe can indeed be a prosecutable offense, if your thoughts and opinions are publicly expressed. Since 1991, if the expression of ones opinion is identified as in some way intimidating to any number of protected groups in America, a citizen can be charged with a crime and have his or her name placed permanently in a centralized registry in the U.S. Justice Department. And the FBI. You can lose your job, have your property seized, be fined and even thrown in jail for expressing an opinion. [2]

New Tactic: Since the homosexual community has been losing almost every political confrontation, Gary DeMar (Biblical Worldview Magazine) predicts that they will change their tactics, with their main objective to "convince the masses that they are just like everyone else, just like the local school teacher, plumber, and neighbor next door." The media is already promoting that agenda. The cover story of the July 17 issue of Newsweek proclaimed, "Bisexuality: Not Gay, Not Straight. A New Sexual Identity Emerges." The magazine spent seven pages rationalizing and promoting sexual deviancy as a new alternate lifestyle. In describing one male/female couple who are both bisexual, Newsweek writer John Leland observed, "'He sometimes wears dresses or makeup to a party; she'll slip into a tuxedo. Sometimes they paint their fingernails together.' The 'male' half of the twosome said, 'Sexuality is fluid. There is no such thing as normal.'"

Opposes Morality: The government is able to oppose morality in very subtle ways. In Modern Maturity, 5/6/95, pages 44-4, Linda Stern points out that current tax and social security laws penalize those who marry and offer advantages to those who live together but unmarried. For example, if two people each own a house and live together, they can each get the one-time $125,000 capital gains exclusion by selling their houses. If they are married, they receive more social security than they would if they get married. Politicians who talk of family values need to change laws which favor life styles that oppose these values [3]

Which Are The Good Guys? In the Bosnian conflict many wonder who are the good guys and who are the bad ones. Maybe "good" doesn't apply to either side. In 1941 Hitler set up a Nazi puppet regime, the Croation (Catholic) Ustashi. The Croatians are Catholic and the Serbs are Eastern Orthodox. With priests and bishops present (some military uniform) and with the blessing of the Vatican, the Catholic Ustashi gave the Servian Orthodox (as well as Moslems and Jews) the choice of conversion to Catholicism or death. Over a million who refused also involved in the war, but are enemies of both Serbs and Croations, and will switch sides depending on which is most advantageous to them. These are the main players (or victims), but, as always, there are others who seek to profit from this war. [4]

Russia's Domestic Difficulties: In August 1991, the Soviet Republic of Moldavia declared its independence and changed its name to Moldova, the traditional Romanian name for the country, remembered historically as Bessarabia. A separatist movement soon developed among the Russian-Ukrainian population of the Trans-Dnestr region, and an armed conflict erupted between the separatists and the Moldovan government. In April 1992, Russian president Boris Yeltsin intervened on the side of the Trans-Dnestr insurgents and the fighting escalated.

Later, in February 1993, Yeltsin held talks with Moldovan president Mircea Snegur, in an attempt to resolve the conflict, but there were no concrete results. Earlier this year General Alexander Lebed, maverick Russian commander of the 14th Army, warned that a withdrawal of Russian troops from Moldova would lead to an ethnic conflict similar to Chechnya (and Bosnia). Lebed's 14th Army is responsible for "peace keeping" between Romanian Moldovans and the Russian-speaking slavs of the Trans-Dnestr region. The General urged the State Duma, "...to adopt legislative measures to protect thousands of Russian citizens who remain outside their historic homeland." He was speaking specifically of Russians in Moldova, but the wider appeal is to the more than 25 million Russians stranded in non-Russian republics of the (sic) former USSR.

Lebed knows his position has a powerful political appeal. He also knows Tula, the region he seeks to represent in the Duma elections. Years ago he commanded the 106th Guards Air Assault Division in the city of Tula. Keep your eye on General Lebed. His ambitions, plus a seat in the Duma, will be a launching pad for his bid for the presidency next year - or maybe even as leader of a future military coup.

Now, consider Chechnya. Under the leadership of General Dzhokar Dudayev, Chechnya unilaterally declared independence from the Russian Federation in 1991. The Mafia is virtually in control of the Chechen government. Drug lords and smugglers are in competition with Russian rivals in this oil rich country. Russian forces badly botched the December '94 attack on Grozny, ordered by Yeltsin. Moscow recognizes that, "...pacifying the entire republic by force is impossible. The Chechens have been fighting the Russians on and off since their incorporation into the Russian empire in 1859." [5]

Moreover, there is a credible nuclear and/or biological threat from the rebels. Russian authorities are worried about a number of nuclear mines (eight) that have been stolen and marketed by a group of former Soviet intelligence agents. The chess pieces are on the board for another Balkan war that could have far reaching consequences. President Clinton's 25,000 man, highly trained and heavily armed (trigger happy? - and with another 100,000 support troops, which brings the total to about 125,000 men and women) force proposed for deployment under NATO in bosnia, will square off against a Russian force with Serb sympathies. The powder and fuel are there, in place, for World War III. Anybody got a light? [6]

Hidden Power: "In the United States today we have, in effect, two governments...We have the duly constituted government ...then we have an independent, uncontrolled (by Congress) and uncoordinated (by money powers which are reserved to Congress by the Constitution." Wright Patman, ex-Chairman of House Banking Committee. "The Federal Reserve(privately owned banks) are one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever seen." Senator Louis T. McFadden who was for 22 years Chairman of the U.S. Banking & Currency commission. [7]

Can Debt Cause Our American Government To Collapse? No! If it were possible it would have happened long ago, since the U.S. government operates in a state of financial default. In fact, the very nature of this government, from its birth, has been based on debt. "The Congress shall have Power...To borrow money on the credit of the United States." [8]

It lives on debt. Debt was the milk of its infancy, and the meant of its maturity. It was conceived and born in debt. It cannot survive without debt. it lives by "borrowing" from "the people." The rub is that it doesn't have to pay its debts. And Constitutionalists tell us that this is all good and proper as long as the debt is kept within reason, and the people, keep paying the government's debt through "legal" taxes, fees, and usury. It is Babylonian insanity. Taxes are nothing but an instrument the government uses to fool people into believing the paper notes they have in their pocketbooks has some value, otherwise the government would not want it.

Governments don't collapse from debt, but by starvation or overthrow either from within or without. They cannot go broke from within as long as they have power over the citizens and force them to pay taxes. And they cannot go broke from without unless a larger, stronger government forecloses upon them (i.e., military invasion or the threat of it). Think about it. The ability to issue currency, tax, and create a standing army are the factors which keep governments in power - not their ability to pay their debts. They can't pay debts. All they can do is "monetize" them (relabel them "assets"). It happens all the time. They steal our goods and our money and call it "tax." Whey hey spend more than they've stolen from us, they call it "deficit" and lay the extra debt upon our backs. That is the Babylonian system. Do you support it? Well, you do if you honor government more than God. For without Him there is no way out of Babylon. Anyone who believes the government is working for our best interests, does NOT know the real meaning of LIBERTY or FREEDOM. Politics of Centralism is the poison of Babylon. There is no way to partake of it without getting poisoned. Don't emulate it. Don't love it. Don't try to salvage parts of it, for it has become corrupt beyond belief. Don't worship it; It is Idolatry! This does not mean we hate this country, it means we hate the beast that has taken this land and our freedom from us, and masquerades as a benevolent master. Central government can give nothing; it can only TAKE (steal). [9]

The Statue of Liberty: Let's take a close look at the woman: Where is this woman standing? Is she standing on the land? She is standing on a monument, but where is this monument located? She stands on an island, in the sea and out of the sea, at the entrance to New York harbor. She stands for the Law of the Sea, not the Law of the Land. Get your encyclopedia and carefully look at her countenance, which is an indication of her mood and emotions. Is she a victorious defender of liberty or does she have another agenda? Does she appear as a bride inviting the Lord Jesus Christ with a motto such as: IN God We Trust, or does she appear to be one of those women whom any man would do well to stay clear of?

Before she was called the Statue of Liberty, she was formally called "Liberty Enlightening The World." True, the tablet in her left hand has the inscription of July 4, 1776. However, there were many things going on at that time in our history besides the Revolutionary War. The Unitarian Church was spawned, and had a Chair at Harvard Divinity School by the year 1800, challenging the great Rock-solid thought-theology of the Scottish Covenanters with the Puritan work ethic. More than 40 of the 57 men who signed the Declaration of Independence held this almost forgotten Christian position for life and government, the claims of the anti-Christ Jews notwithstanding. This was also known as the Age of Enlightenment, a philosophical antithesis of Christian liberty. This was the general philosophy that spawned socialism, and Karl Marx's work, entitled the Communist Manifesto.

It was the age of Jews Darwin and C.I. Scofield, and the shifting of the Christian Church from its moorings under the Protestant Reformation identified by its Puritans and the Pilgrims, to the "enlightened higher criticism" of the Bible. This Lady of Liberty did not seek those who had in their genes a proven track record of hard work, inventive genius and scholarship under the Protestant Work Ethic. Instead she sought to attract "huddled masses" who were acclimated to the Roman Civil Law from whence they came. They were well adjusted to being told what to do. Spring as they did from their old European false matriarchal thought-theologies, they would become good subjects of THE DISTRICT and fodder for their continuous wars.

Perhaps it is important here to show that this Enlightened Liberty was first proposed by a Frenchman right after the American Civil War. It has been said by many historians that before the War Between the States, we were called Virginians or Vermonters. Afterwards, after this "Roman Civil War," however, we lost our state distinctions and became simply Americans. Why? Well, the Frenchman Edward de Laboulaye knew, even if most Americans today do not, that the "American (Roman) Civil War dramatically altered the American form of government. The sovereign status of the Republic of the States, was subordinated by virtue of the South losing the war, to that of THE DISTRICT which had won that war. The Constitution was amended to reflect these subtle changes. The Law of the Land, which provided unheard of prosperity, was to be gradually eroded to be supplanted by the Law of the Sea, the enlightened self-interest of those who held one of the various competing international government philosophies. George Bush called his enlightened philosophy '1,000 points of light' and some of knew for sure what his agenda was to be."

Digging in even deeper, we find that the "Statue of Enlightened Liberty" was designed by a Jewish French sculptor, named Frédéric-Auguste Bartholdi. It is commonly believed that he used his Jewish mother as his model. A cartoon appeared in "Life Magazine" in 1907, and more recently published by the Hebrew Union College, a Jewish Institute of Religion in Cincinnati, Ohio, in their pamphlet Jews In American Satire and Humor. While Christian Americans may be astounded, be assured that the Jews among us know who "THEIR" Lady of Enlightened Liberty is and what she really stands for.

As you look at the Lady of Enlightened Liberty, what is that hat or crown she is wearing? Where in the world did the artist or sculptor come up with that particular design? In all your life, did you ever seen any other lady wearing such an unusual hat? Many so-called Judeo-Christian preachers have enunciated thousands of words of BS and outright right lies about it, but here is a couple of thoughts for you to consider.

Do you suppose that the Prophet Daniel ever saw the United States in his interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar's curious dram? He correctly forecast the fall of ancient Babylon, with its head of gold and the rise of Medo-Persia, with its breast of silver, as the 2nd Kingdom that was even greater than Babylon. Next he saw the rise of the 3rd Kingdom which we know was the Greek Empire, with its belly of brass, under Alexander, The Great.

Finally Daniel told us of a curious 4th Kingdom, identified as having legs of iron. It was this 4th Kingdom, the Roman Empire, that was in power at the time of Christ's life one earth. With the allegory of the two legs, we know this Kingdom would be made up of two parts, which was first the military Roman Empire covering all the then known world, at least so far as the Romans were concerned.

Following its collapse, it would become the Holy Roman Empire ruled by what has evolved into the Roman Catholic Church. If Daniel was correct, that second part of the 4th Kingdom would reign, in one way or another, until Christ returns to set up His Kingdom here on the earth. Christ's Kingdom is the same as Daniel's 5th Kingdom. So timing world events from "head to toe" down Daniel's allegory in time, where are we now? Are we not in the time of the toes? Isn't Christ's Kingdom, however you have been taught to understand it, right around the corner? Are we not now in the exciting "toes of time?"

Remember, we pray in The Lord's Prayer that "...Thy Kingdom come, thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven." That prayer will be fully answered when His Kingdom is established here. The 4th Kingdom held power for more than 2,000 years, but during its power those foundations for the 5th were already being laid. The "toes of time" is that span of time when there began the rise of Christian influences around the earth, and the beginning of the decline of the Roman influences that Europe or below the Rio Grande in the West, is considered today as even a minor power in the earth. Gone is the flower and power of Italy/Rome, Spain, France and Portugal, of the 16th and 17th Centuries, for instance. Why? Their lands are defiled by allowing Christians to be tortured and burned at The Stake.

The Jewish influences and control of the Roman Catholic Church began before the year 1,000 A.D., and the holocaust, (a Jewish and Roman Catholic, but not a German term) of the Spanish Inquisition was brought about by these Jews in the name of the Catholic Church. In the 4th Kingdom's final fling, we see the Jewish Lady of Enlightened Liberty with her "eternal flame," similar to that on the grave of the late Catholic President Kennedy, beckoning the "huddled masses" of Roman Catholic Southern Europe to partake of the good life established upon the land of this Wilderness by those holding the religious beliefs of the Reformation. So, the Jewish Lady of Enlightened Liberty stands at the gateway to the Jewish Banks of New York which now bleed the world of the substance of its labor in the form of forbidden usury. Remember as you think of the nation's debt, it is not a national debt, no matter how often you hear that term on TV. There is a huge, four trillion dollar federal debt owed to these international bankers by The District. The District, and those of you who put your allegiance there, have the Lady of Enlightened Liberty. The Republic has the true Lady of Liberty, an Anglo-Saxon beautiful Christian Lady as depicted on our lawful money from the loving hands of Augustus Saint-Gaudens of Cornish, New Hampshire.

Following is a very interesting article by Caleb Israel, which I thought you might be interested in.

Persecuting the Saints: It took me a lot of years to find the Kingdom of Heaven; I can't for the life of me figure out why it took so long for me to see it, but then I run into Christians all the time who have been reading and studying the same Bible for more years than I have, and they do not see it either. I guess it has to be revealed by Jesus Christ before one can se it.

I know one thing for sure, you don't know what persecution is all about until you enter into the Kingdom of Heaven on earth. You kind of expect a little persecution from people from time to time, but not from the government; particularly in America where the foundation of government is the freedom of religion and the free exercise thereof.

But just try exercising your religion by driving with "Heaven" driving documents, and wow! Does it ever upset the anti-Christ police officers, attorneys, and judges. The most sarcastic remarks come from the lawyers. I guess it's because of all the bad things Jesus had to say about them, that makes them that way. Some police officers are sarcastic, but most of them keep their comments to themselves.

In the day of Jesus' ministry the scribes and Pharisees (the Jews) were what we would call lawyers today; those who are learned at law. Jesus told them in Matthew 23:13: "But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in."

The trouble with lawyers is, they have the idea that the law is going to save society. They think law will make people better. But the Bible tells us in Ephesians 2:8-10: "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them."

In America there is an over-abundance of lawyers, and they really serve no purpose, except to bind heavy burdens upon the people. They have found their way into the legislatures of the governments; and because of their obsession with the law, they love to make new laws all the time. The reason? Because they love to lord it over people.

When Jesus gave the offices of His government to the apostles, at the last supper He had with them, He had to stop them from disputing about which of them would be the greatest. He said to them: "The kings of the nations exercise lordship over them (the people), and those who exercise authority over them are called benefactors. But not so among you; he who is greatest among you; let him be as the younger (least), and he who governs, as he who serves." You see, the leaders of the people are to serve the people. They are to be servants. Not so in the governments created by men. Those in authority, which are 99% lawyers, want the people to serve them. That should tell us right there that state governments are ungodly. Nearly all the people who work in the agencies created by the legislatures want to lord it over the people they deal with; and tell them how to live and what to do.

Lawyers were a forbidden group in some of the colonies in early America. One of the reasons, I believe, is that the people who developed the colonies were in the New Covenant with God the Father. They taught their children how to read...from the Scriptures. Their children were brought up on the Word of God. Jesus said in John 6:63: "It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life." I believe the more one reads the words of our Redeemer, the more he is filled with God's Spirit.

When America's children were being fed a diet of spirit from God, He blessed the people, who were growing into a great nation. And at the same time the bonds which kept them in political slavery to the King of England were being loosed. Jesus was setting His people free. That was 220 years ago. Today we find the bulk of Americans in political slavery again. What on earth happened that a free people could wind up in political slavery again?

Well, my opinion is, the people made for themselves another god when they established central government, the government of the United States. After all, before then they were clearly in covenant with God. By obeying His commandments, God was showing favor to them. But when they established another government to make laws and treaties for them, God began to withdraw His blessings. They were practicing idolatry, which is against God first commandment in Exodus 20:3: "You shall have no other gods before me."

When they made the United States their lawgiver, they made the United States their god. The Bible says in Isaiah 33:22: "For the Lord is our judge, the Lord is our lawgiver, the Lord is our king; he will save us." The United States is an idol and those who worship her are idolaters (to worship something or someone is to obey it or that someone). What we have in America is people in political slavery to an idol of their own making. The way to be set free from this wicked and perverse government is to renounce all ties with it. According to the Declaration of Independence, individuals have a choice whether to be governed by the government of the United States or not to be. It says, "governments established among men (free men) derive their powers from the consent of the governed." One must give his consent first. It is easy to give your consent. Most of us gave our consent before we were old enough to know what we were doing. It began with a birth certificate, which is a contract that says, this child was born in the state Texas (or whatever state the parents believed they lived in).

Most people do not know that the land is a part of God's Kingdom. They have been taught in the government schools that the land is the state; but the state is just a political structure. It is invisible; it is spiritual. The government took the map of America and divided it all up into boundary lines on the map and named them various names such as Nevada, California, Texas etc. They have taught the people, by their government schools, that the land inside these political boundaries are the states. But that is not correct. The land still belongs to God; He created it for the people to live on and possess; He has never given title to any man or group of men. He owns it, it is His Kingdom. If one makes a declaration that he is a resident of the state of Texas, the state of Nevada, the state of California, etc., then the state has taken him off the land and he has become a resident of an invisible political structure. He has given his consent to be governed by whatever state he wants to be governed by. He can move from state to state; and each time he moves he gives his consent to the next state by his declaration. I am a resident of the state of Nevada. That is what makes one a citizen of the United States.

I renounced all my ties and citizenship with these false gods when I found out that Jesus Christ gave Himself, to be a sacrifice, that my sins could be blotted out of existence, and that He has set me free to live in His Kingdom, which is the land. My biggest problem now is staying free. These false gods do not like it, because I will not submit to their usurped authority, and they slam me into their jails to try and get me to change my mind.

I believe that IF we live in a free society like they want us to believe, we should have a choice whether we want to be governed by God in His Kingdom, or by the false gods states. IF we are free as they say, and teach in their schools, then we should be free! If people want to live in an invisible political structure created by some very clever men, that's fine. Let the governments take out their frustrations on those who belong to them. But leave me alone, I belong to God. I am His creation and a part of His government on earth. Alleluia!

Oh Lord God Almighty, help your people see the error of their ways, that they may have your seal upon their foreheads. "Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his. And, Let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity."

May the grace and peace from God the Father be with you all, through Jesus Christ our King. Amen.

The following has been copied from the Congressional record and it has facts of interest.

Mr. Thorkelson. Mr. Speaker, under leave to extend my own remarks in the Record, I include an article issued by the Imperial Fascist Union, of London, England. I shall not comment on this article except to say that the reference to masonry, no doubt, refers to the Grand Orient and not to the English-American Masons as we know them, in the United States.

Those Britons who stand amazed at the defeatist trend of their country's politics; who begin to ask themselves whether our civilization is worthwhile: and who are puzzled as to how this state of things should ever have come about, will find explained in this pamphlet the cause of it all - the race itself is changing.

The great Persian, Greek, and Roman civilizations died out from this same cause. The dominant Aryan race responsible for their development became to weak by intermarriage with lesser races, until the product could no longer maintain Aryan standards.

Colonel Lindberg, in 1936, left the United States of America for exactly these reasons. Although individual Americans will continue to pull their weight in pioneering for humanity, yet the people of the United States can no longer, in the main, maintain a decent enough standard of public conduct to protect him from unprovoked annoyance.

This pamphlet demonstrates the Jewish contamination among the titled families in Britain. It has been difficult to "dig out" the information; perhaps the most encouraging aspect in a depressing research has been the obvious desire on the part of most of the affected families to hide their Jewishness; only when it is discovered and dragged forward into the limelight do these families sometimes begin to assert that "they are proud of their Jewish blood!" A similar phenomenon was observed by the Jewish compilers of the "Who's Who in American Jewry" (1926) who state in their introduction to the volume, "Some persons preferred to be omitted rather than associate their names with those of their racial colleagues. A few even rejected with indignation the proposal of being included in a volume where their Jewish identity would become a matter of public knowledge."

How completely the Jewish Masonic teaching of racial equality has conquered Aryan thought in this country is perhaps best indicated by the absence hitherto of any literature dealing with the race change. Although this booklet deals only with the titled aristocracy, a similar state of affairs could easily be demonstrated among the official, commercial, and professional communities. Possibly the least affected and most Aryan community is the agricultural one. That, incidentally, is one of the reasons why, in a Jew-owned land it comprises only about 5 percent of the nation's workers.

Our case can be presented best, we think, by a consideration first of the examples of Spain and Portugal, where the process of Aryan racial degeneration has taken place not far away from us either in distance or in time, while a sufficient period of the latter has elapsed to prove that nations that have gone down from racial causes cannot rise again by their own unaided efforts.

The necessity for an aristocracy to supervise the nation';s politics is a fundamental tenant of the fascist creed. In publishing this pamphlet we have no idea of attacking the aristocratic principle; we simply present evidence that, for racial reason, our "aristocracy" has ceased to function in its duty as a protector of the people, and that the racial changes taking place in its is symptomatic of a racial change affecting other parts of the community, a change which will destroy the British Empire (and the United States) unless it is rendered impotent to injure us.

Foul Brood - The Racial Transformation of a Nation-Enforced Masonic Universal Brotherhood: There is a disease of bees called foul brood, which when it affects a hive, corrupts it irredeemably. An analogous malady is that which destroyed the greatness of Spain and Portugal, and which has secured for itself a strong footing in Britain (and America), where the symptoms are obvious enough, although puzzling to all who do not appreciate their racial cause.

Spain and Portugal bore the brunt of the early Jewish invasion into western European territory. The poison insinuated itself the more easily because racial differences were obscured by religious ones, so that it was comparatively simple for the Jew to accept Christianity outwardly, while remaining at heart a Jew and practicing Jewish rites in the privacy of his home. Thus arose the Marrano community, or Crpto-Jews, who at first avoided to some extent the extreme consequences of the hostility of those of the dominant faith.

In the fifteenth century, the Marranos, or Secret Jews, dominated Spanish life, occupying high positions not only in the administration, the universities, the (armed) forces, and the judiciary, but also in the church itself. Their outward conformity to the Catholic Church, together with their accumulation of wealth, enabled them to penetrate by marriage such an extent into the most exalted families in the land that it became difficult to find an aristocratic family in Aragon or in castile which was not contaminated with the foul stream of Jewish blood.

The worm turned at last and not only were all professing Jews expelled from Spain, or forcibly converted and later expelled from Portugal, but the inquisition attacked the Marrano community, the position of which was ever afterward insecure and hopeless.

The greatest period of Spanish history followed the expulsion; and Portugal built up her great colonial Empire subsequent to the riddance of the professing Jew. But in both cases, the curse descended upon the colonial possessions of these two nations: in Peru, the Jew held the commerce of the country in his hands, and it was impossible for a Castellan to succeed in business without a Jewish-partner: the Jews purchased the cargoes of great fleets with fictitious credits which they divided among themselves, rendering large capital unnecessary. When the struggle between Portugal and Holland for the possession of Brazil took place, the Marranos worked for the Dutch enemy.

At home the Spanish and Portuguese had, however, made the supreme mistake of imagining that any Marrano could be a substitute for a European. Absolute discrimination between white European Christians and the "new Christians" as the Marranos were called, was only insisted on by the best informed of the aristocracy, who kept a record of the "new Christians" so that intermarriage with them might cease. The racial quality of the people degenerated rapidly as the Jewish contagion spread by intermarriage.

Then, at last, the assault was deliberately made on the last citadel of racial purity. On St. John's Day, 1774, Frederick Primne o Wales grand master of English Masons, admitted the Portuguese Ambassador, Dom Scbastio de Carvalho e Mello, to a London Lodge; this Gentleman better known as Pombal, revived Masonry in Portugal on his return to that country.

On May 2, 1768, Pombal ordered the destruction of all registers of Marrano families, and ordered all the heads of exclusive and race-conscious Portuguese families to arrange that any daughter of marriageable age must be engaged within 4 months to marry a member of one of the hitherto excluded Jew-contaminated families. This horrible Masonic outrage made an end of the Portuguese as a great nation.

In Spain, discrimination between the Aryan and the non-Aryan gradually declined under similar influences, although the Corps of Cadets insisted upon an unsullied racial origin as a qualification for entry up to 1860, while in some parish churches, even in the nineteenth century, notices were still displayed warning the old Christians against intermarrying with the "new Christians."

To some extent, of course, in Spain the Moorish occupation had been responsible for a dilution of the Aryan and Mediterranean blood of the people, but this Moorish corruption was never subtle, and its penetration was therefore weak. On the other hand the Portuguese, through their custom of intermarrying with colored people in their colonies and through the return of the resultant half-breeds to the home country, have suffered great contamination from non-Jewish race of color.

Both Spain and Portugal went down because their native peoples had sullied their blood with that of lower races to a toxic degree; "foul brood" has corrupted them beyond hope. Damage of this kind is permanent. That being so, let our readers consider what is going in these islands, and ask themselves how Britain (and America) can regain her proper place in the world without first recovering her race-consciousness, and how she can do that without accepting the remedy of the imperial Fascist League.

But don't try that game on the Saxon; you'll have the whole brood round your ears.

From the richest old thne in the country to the poorest chained serf in the field,

They'll be at you and on you like hornets, and, if you are wise, you will yield.

Don't trust any clerk to interpret when they come with the tale of their wrongs.

Let them know that you know what they're saying; let them feel that you know what to say.

It's the sport not the rabbits they're after (we've plenty of game in the park).

For a hard-bitten, South-country poacher makes the best man-at-arms you can find.

Appear with your wife and the children at their weddings and funerals and feasts.

Say 'we,' 'us' and 'our' when you're talking, instead of 'you fellows' and 'I.'

National Health Care: A recurring topic of national debate in our country relates to the Clinton Administration's proposal to enact national health care via federal legislation. Many appreciate the serious adverse consequences to the American people which will obviously flow from the operation of such a law. For example, the Canadians, the British and other socialized nations have had similar programs in effect for a number of years and the quality of medical care has measurably declined, except for the very elite, as a direct result. These being the effects of socialized medicine, various groups oppose this and similar bills. Others view the proposed law with a longer range and can envision a day and time in our country when medical care will be systematically denied to those who oppose the party in power. Analyzed solely upon its merits, these types of bills should never be enacted. However, the debate regarding this extremely important issue deals exclusively with the merits, and none has asked the crucial question: Does Congress possess such a power? Listening to either of the major conservative media voices, The "G-Man" or Rush Limbaugh, one would think that Congress quite obviously possesses the power to enact such a law. Lesser known commentators are no better, and they likewise are silent as to the issue of the possession of congressional power to control the practice of medicine within the States. This silence may be due to ignorance, or it may be a carefully orchestrated effort to avoid noting a serious flaw.

This issue of whether to enact a national health care law should not center around the merits of such a proposal but should first encompass answering the question of congressional power. The simple fact of the matter is that Congress has no such power and in Linder v. United States, 268 U.S. 5, 18, 45 S.Ct. 446 (1925), the Supreme Court so declared: "Obviously, direct control of medical practice in the state is beyond the power of the federal government."

This constitutional principle was also acknowledged in United States v. Anthony, 15 F.Supp. 553,555 (S.D. Cal., 1936), and United States v. Evers, 453 F.Supp. 1141, 1150 (M.D. Ala., 1978), and copies of the relevant paragraphs from these decisions are reproduced below. These cases make it plain that Congress does not have the power to enact national health care and this principle should therefore be the chief or at least a primary argument to oppose national health care.

The patriot movement in this country surely desires to see this bill defeated. But, this movement has suffered from bad press, attacks by the government, a defeatist attitude, an inability to communicate with the rest of America, and numerous other maladies. We thus need a training exercise to show movement members and the public that we can indeed have a great effect upon an issue of national concern. Why don't we simply make a serious effort to educate others about the very simple principles noted above and thus push this point of law out into the open public debate? If we succeed, then we can know that we really do have a voice in America. It's very simple, so let's give it a try.

Linder v. United States 268 U.S. 5, 45 S.Ct. 446: "...we accept as established doctrine that any provision of an act of Congress ostensibly enacted under power granted by the Constitution, not naturally and reasonably adapted to the effective exercise of such power, but solely to the achievement of something plainly within power reserved to the states, is invalid and cannot be enforced." McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Whet 316, 423, and other cases which are omitted; "Obviously, direct control of medical practice in the states is beyond the power of the federal government. (Also quoted in F.T.C. v. Simeon Management Corp., 391 F.Supp. 667 (1975)) Incidental regulation of such practice by Congress through a taxing act cannot extend to matters plainly inappropriate and unnecessary to reasonable enforcement of a revenue measure."; "U.S. v. Jin Fuey Moy, supra, points out that thee Narcotic Law can be upheld only as a revenue measure. It must be interpreted and applied accordingly ...The sharp division of the court in this cause and the opinion in Jin Fuey Moy's Case clearly indicated that the statute must be strictly construed and not extended beyond the proper limits of a revenue measure."; In People v. Privitera, Cal.App., 141 Cal.Rptr. 764, 774 (1977), "the court in approving the patient's right to an abortion prescribed by her physician stated that: 'To require prior State approval before advising - prescribing - administering - new treatment modality for an informed consenting patient is to suppress innovation by the person best qualified to make medical progress. The treating doctor, the clinician, is at the cutting edge of medical knowledge. To require the doctor to use only orthodox 'State sanctioned' methods of treatment under threat of criminal penalty for variance is to invite a repetition in California of the Soviet experience with Lysenkoism. The mention of a requirement that licensed doctors must prescribe, treat, 'within State sanctioned alternatives' raises the specter of medical stagnation at the best, statism, paternalistic big brother at worst. It is by the alternatives to orthodoxy that medical progress has been made. A free, progressive society has an enormous stake in recognizing and protecting this right of the physician." 453 Federal Supplement, 1150.

A certain man traveling with his son had his son riding on the horse. The people cried out saying, "Look at that strong young son riding while his father walks." Wanting to please everyone, when they entered the next city, the father took the saddle, and the son led the horse. The people called out, "Man, why do you ride and make your boy walk?" When they entered the third city, wanting to please everyone there, both father and son were riding the horse. The people there called out, "Look a those strong men both riding on that one poor horse." There is no way that you and I can please everyone. No matter what you do, there will be people who will deliberately take the opposite position. If you try to please everyone, and succeed, then you have taken no strong position on anything. It is this lukewarmness that Christ spews out of His mouth, not the person who is doing his best and makes a mistake. It is by mistakes that we all grow in stature and wisdom. Finally, no matter what happens, the Lord has our days numbered since the foundation of the world, and all things are exactly as they are supposed to be at any given moment. For Christ and His coming Kingdom.

The U.S. Government Master Financial Plan: After many years of waiting, the new currency will be introduced in 1996. Teams of educators are already being trained so they can fan out across America to explain why we have to have a new currency. This article will tell you what could happen.

* It would appear the government's real purpose is to flush out and control whatever cash Americans have hidden under their mattresses, shoe boxes, tin cans, cookie jars. The counterfeiters are a minor problem, the claims of the government notwithstand-ing. Few Americans have seen one. Drug smugglers are multi-national operators with a choice of any currency and the best advisors money can buy. They do not file currency reports. Americans must. They are ready. Americans are not.

* As the South African two-tier currency, the domestic dollar will be the weak one and the new foreign dollar the strong one. Ironically, South Africa just abandoned their two-tier currency.

* A strong foreign dollar is EASY to accomplish; currency markets are out of control and governments may be forced to develop a quasi-gold link to calm the waters.

* The U.S. will either be the first or will lead the way to a "gold backed" dollar. Greenspan has also alluded to the possibility of a gold relationship to currencies. But this will be for foreigners, NOT AMERICANS!

* Where will this debt burdened nation get the gold needed to put a real foundation under the new foreign dollar? The U.S. has the world's largest hoard of gold - 262 million ozs. At the current price this gold is worth over $100-billion.

* How can they add to this while solving other problems? Confiscation! of privately held gold bullion coins and bars, just as FDR did.

* How else? The U.S. government will buy all the domestic production of gold at some yet unknown price; but it is likely to be at a little over $40 an oz.

* What about the domestic dollar? It will continue to be backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government just as it is today. Paper Backed by Words.

* Convertability? Yes but only to foreign currencies via banks and exchange kiosks at airports. Why? Because every transaction will be reported to the Central Control Computer in Washington, D.C. and Every Suspicious Transaction Results in a Compliance Type Audit! Too many trips to tax havens = AUDIT. Too many large transactions = AUDIT. Control is The Ultimate Aim of the Plan!

* If gold is Confiscated how much will the government give you? What they must pay, is the official price of gold; which is currently $42.22 an oz. Want to sue them about this? Forget it. It has already been to the U.S. Supreme Court which ruled that the U.S. government has the right to set the official price of gold At any level! This is also a precedent going back more than 100 years.

* After FDR Confiscated gold in 1934 the official price was increased by 75%. Will it happen again? Maybe. It all depends on events that are now unfolding but don't hold on to gold bullion and have it stored anywhere in the United States. It is far too risky.

* Penalties? Same as 1934. Confiscation of Gold From Those Who Refuse to Comply+ a fine up to $10,000. New twist? Today, it will be a serious felony to not comply just as it is to fail to report a foreign account.

* Foreign Accounts: Beginning in 1993 it Became a Felony to not check off the box on the U.S. annual tax report that tells the government that you have a foreign bank account. It also became a felony to not file the TD F 90-22.1 report which also tells the government that you have a foreign account. It is now mandatory to inform them if you have a Foreign Investment Account of Any Type.

The reason given by Senator Leahy for introducing his bill for a two-tier currency is that it will have a severe impact on drug smugglers and counterfeiters. Although it is difficult for an average American to address what drug lords and the like are up to, common sense dictates that their filthy business is extremely profitable with revenues exceeding $100-billion a year. That is equal in size to the value of the national gold reserves for our entire nation. That is Big Money to anyone. With that amount of income these criminals can and do hire the best experts in the world to handle their cash and they are certainly multi-national operations that utilize a number of currencies, meaning, they are not restricted to U.S. dollars. These Evil Empires are way ahead of the government. To believe otherwise is to deny that they are a $100 billion per annum problem which our government says they are.

The counterfeiting situation, however, can be examined and quantified by using information from the U.S. Secret Service which has among its duties, protecting us from counterfeiting. There is little doubt that the Secret Service is one of the finest-maybe the best-agency, especially when it comes to counterfeiting.

2). According to the Secret Service's own report only $25 million in bogus currency was passed to the U.S. public in 1994 and $45 million was seized. Compare that to the $374 billion dollars in circulation everyday within the U.S.

3). To make this easier for us to understand, the Secret Service states that 627,000 counterfeit bills were passed to the U.S. public in 1995. That means that 1 in every 400 Americans get stuck with a bad bill last year, between the seven denominations we use.

Conclusion: Counterfeiting is a $25 million dollar a year problem to Americans and a $137 million a year problem to people in other countries where the Secret Service cannot operate. Therefore a two-tier currency cannot possibly be justified by our counterfeiting problem especially as the Secret Service does, and will continue to do a fine job.

As far as the drug cartels are concerned the use of a two-tier currency along the lines described would make more sense although they will easily circumvent it. We will have a two-tier currency because of the reasons already mentioned such as putting a Gold Floor under the foreign dollar and a desire to continue to tighten controls over as many financial transactions as possible. Control Equals Power In Any Country!

The Noose Has Really Tightened and these new laws are retroactive. Please keep in mind that the government Highly Punishes any form of currency violation including structuring. Sleep well by obeying the laws.

[1] Genesis 11:1-9; Christian News, 3277 Boeuf Lutheran Rd. New Haven, MO 63068, 10/16/95.

[2] Media Bypass, via, Smyrna, P.O. Box 541, Fortuna, CA 95540.

[3] Does God Exist? September/October 95.

[4] The Voice in the Wilderness, 10/95, Box 210098, Dallas, Texas 75211.

[5] Intelligence Digest, 21 July 1995.

[6] Global Glance Bill Bathman, Editor P.O. Box 28240, Tempe, AZ 85285.

[7] For details, read Ruse and Fall of the U.S.

[8] Art. 1 Sec. 8.

[9] American Christian Ministries, P.O. Box 740, Grangeville, Idaho 83530.

[10] "If anything, the law should encourage, not forbid, the intermingling of bloods...But legislation cannot change the human heart. The only way we can accomplish that, the only we can achieve a Final Solution to racial prejudice, is to create a mélange of races so universal that no one can preen himself on his racial 'purity' or practice the barbarism to safeguard it. The deliberate encouragement of interracial marriages is the only way to hasten this process. And it may be that time is growing short. The dominance of our world has begun to shift, like cargo in a listing vessel, from the White races to the colored. The sooner we adjust to this fact, the better it will be for our children. For we might well acknowledge, even the most enlightened of us, that we will never completely eliminate racial prejudice until we eliminate separate races." (Rabbi Abraham L. Feinberg, Maclean's Magazine, September 5, 1967).